Title IX and NIL
- Thread starter IUCrazy2
- Start date
Department Of Education Throws A Wrench Into NCAA Revenue Sharing Model With Title IX Rules Memo
This could possibly be changed or altered in some way when new leadership in the White House begins, but has thrown a wrench into some school's plans for revenue-sharing.
www.outkick.com
I’m guessing schools will find a way to get 80% to FB and MBB one way or another. FB generates most of the revenue and I can’t see a situation where the revenue share to FB is disproportionately low.
As far as Indiana's level of competitiveness it really matters very little. NIL won't be affected, people can pay kids what they want for whatever 'job' they want, seems like the courts have said. And we have decent NIL for now.
The more restrictions on revenue sharing IMO, the more room there will be for schools that used to flagrantly cheat **coughSEC-SEC_SECcough** to find ways to do so again. Or, just raise more NIL than most.
The more restrictions on revenue sharing IMO, the more room there will be for schools that used to flagrantly cheat **coughSEC-SEC_SECcough** to find ways to do so again. Or, just raise more NIL than most.
It's going to be hard to cheat on rev share. It's paid by the athletic departments of large, mostly public institutions. Athletic departments are audited and those results are public. Cheating via rev share is too risky, if a school was caught people in charge of oversight and risk control may be fired, and it may invite state gov't scrutiny and probably the IRS as well.
NIL has basically no rules or oversight. If school want to get money to players, that's the low risk route to go.
NIL has basically no rules or oversight. If school want to get money to players, that's the low risk route to go.
SEC schools will more readily cut other sports if it's a loophole around 'equal opportunity'.
Agree. From a litigation fear perspective, the colleges would rather do battle with the government on a Title IX case than risk another anti-trust case.
