ADVERTISEMENT

The SOB truly doesn’t know the difference between an illegal immigrant and a refugee

However, January 6 was never mentioned during his six-day trial last year, despite the fact that it was his arrest on accusations of trespassing near the U.S. Capitol and engaging in disorderly conduct, both federal misdemeanors, that led to the federal trial in Tampa.


Yup. That sounds like the Biden DOJ for ya.

Pick him up for 1/6. Oh wait he didn’t do anything wrong on 1/6? What else can we find? Weapons charge? Perfect!

What an absolute farce.

I understand why you dislike him though. Green Beret. Same reason you dislike Hegseth. Infantryman.

Those types of skit-kickers tend to make the boat boys feel self conscious. And they should.
Explosives, classified document too. Crimes.

I don’t dislike him. I have a ton of friends who served in the Army. Infantry and Special Forces included. Married into an Army family. Went to the Army Command and General Staff College. You don’t know jack squat about these things. Your last to paragraphs are stupid even for you.
 
Well aware. Nobody likes executive orders until their guy issues executive orders. I’m not even sure the dumbass knows he’s trying to change the constitution with his birth citizenship promise…. You know, the same constitution he so dearly loves that he includes it in the $1000 signed Trump Bible.
Do you realize the 14th Amendment was about former slaves and not illegal immigrants until a liberal court made it so. Trump isn't my favorite republican but neither are you since you don't understand the Constitution and its Amendments.
 
However, January 6 was never mentioned during his six-day trial last year, despite the fact that it was his arrest on accusations of trespassing near the U.S. Capitol and engaging in disorderly conduct, both federal misdemeanors, that led to the federal trial in Tampa.


Yup. That sounds like the Biden DOJ for ya.

Pick him up for 1/6. Oh wait he didn’t do anything wrong on 1/6? What else can we find? Weapons charge? Perfect!

What an absolute farce.

I understand why you dislike him though. Green Beret. Same reason you dislike Hegseth. Infantryman.

Those types of skit-kickers tend to make the boat boys feel self conscious. And they should.
There's more. Jeremy was approached by a pair of feds, at his home, 'just to have a talk'. Vid and audio recorded by Jeremy. He agreed to 'talk' with the same two feds later, in a public place, and here, again, vid and audio were recorded. The feds pitched Jeremy that he could 'help them out' with some investigation they were conducting. Brown had no interest in collaboration with the feds and told them so.
Brown was in attendance at the Inauguration protest. He did not go into any buildings, nor destroy any property, nor assault anyone.
He was later arrested, charged with two misdemeanors, and locked up, where he remains today. His home was broken into, searched,(not sure if a warrent was issued)...the Fed claims a prohibited explosive device and two prohibited weapons were 'discovered,' in the home, and two felony charges were filed.
Forensic exam failed to link Jeremy to the devices.
It is obvious retribution for his exposing the criminal actions of the federal government.
 
However, January 6 was never mentioned during his six-day trial last year, despite the fact that it was his arrest on accusations of trespassing near the U.S. Capitol and engaging in disorderly conduct, both federal misdemeanors, that led to the federal trial in Tampa.


Yup. That sounds like the Biden DOJ for ya.

Pick him up for 1/6. Oh wait he didn’t do anything wrong on 1/6? What else can we find? Weapons charge? Perfect!

What an absolute farce.

I understand why you dislike him though. Green Beret. Same reason you dislike Hegseth. Infantryman.

Those types of skit-kickers tend to make the boat boys feel self conscious. And they should.
Very self conscious.
 
Help me out, I am not seeing a reference to slaves (other than in section 4, where the government is not responsible for reimbursing costs of emancipation)

The first sentence of Section 1 seems especially clear.

Fourteenth Amendment​

Section 1​

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2​

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4​

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5​

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
 
I would think that any law-and-order Republican would frown on private citizens having a stash of live hand grenades.

Planted? LOL. "That coke you found up my nose, I swear to God, the Feds shoved it there!"
 
1520108935762
Pssssst...I beat you and Aloha to this story (and response) by hours over in the "This is Trump's America Now" thread.
Geez.
 
Trump might actually end up deporting fewer people simply by giving other countries cause not to cooperate.


Sounds like both Brazil and Colombia are primarily objecting to the demeaning treatment given to the deportees. They should have learned from the first Trump administration, the cruelty is the point.
 
Sounds like both Brazil and Colombia are primarily objecting to the demeaning treatment given to the deportees. They should have learned from the first Trump administration, the cruelty is the point.
Good. Let’s hope they are all over the news in their countries telling everyone how awful the whole experience was. It will be a good deterrent…
 
Everybody here should be well aware of my position on tariffs and other forms of trade protectionism.

But, if you’re going to use them, this is about the only useful way to do it.

Tariffs on Colombia wouldn’t impact all that hard on Americans. Neither would retaliatory tariffs done by them.

But they would both be devastating to Colombia.
 
Everybody here should be well aware of my position on tariffs and other forms of trade protectionism.

But, if you’re going to use them, this is about the only useful way to do it.

Tariffs on Colombia wouldn’t impact all that hard on Americans. Neither would retaliatory tariffs done by them.

But they would both be devastating to Colombia.

Does anyone know where the coffee for Starbucks comes from? I'm not sure he can take another price hike.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UncleMark
  • Haha
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
You might need to just tap out for a bit.
Goats been trying to throw cold water on the deportation operation since the beginning. He’s bought much of the obfuscation from the Biden administration and their hack media surrogates about a lack of resources and the political complexities of repatriation. Wrong. They just didn’t have the will

If Obama can deport 400K each year and no one even notice, Trump can easily hit 1 mil a year. Maybe more.
 
Goats been trying to throw cold water on the deportation operation since the beginning. He’s bought much of the obfuscation from the Biden administration and their hack media surrogates about a lack of resources and the political complexities of repatriation. Wrong. They just didn’t have the will

If Obama can deport 400K each year and no one even notice, Trump can easily hit 1 mil a year. Maybe more.
You act like these are people Trump went out and picked up off the street and shipped to Colombia. They aren't. They are people who would have been deported, anyway. But because Trump is an ass, he had to make a big show of it and threaten all sorts of shit to get from Colombia what any other president would have already had.

Let's see what the totals look like in a year. You'll be disappointed.
 
You act like these are people Trump went out and picked up off the street and shipped to Colombia. They aren't. They are people who would have been deported, anyway. But because Trump is an ass, he had to make a big show of it and threaten all sorts of shit to get from Colombia what any other president would have already had.

Let's see what the totals look like in a year. You'll be disappointed.
So Columbia initially refused the repatriation flights because why? They didn’t like Trumps rhetoric about illegal immigrants?

If so, that’s asinine and they deserve everything Trump threatened them with.

You’re right, Trump has been in office for only five days and these specific deportees were likely already detained when he got in office.

So what? If Columbia hadn’t stepped on their dick none of us would even know these flights were happening.
 
So Columbia initially refused the repatriation flights because why? They didn’t like Trumps rhetoric about illegal immigrants?

If so, that’s asinine and they deserve everything Trump threatened them with.

You’re right, Trump has been in office for only five days and these specific deportees were likely already detained when he got in office.

So what? If Columbia hadn’t stepped on their dick none of us would even know these flights were happening.
They were explicit. They didn't like that the deportees were shackled, which they claimed violated the deportation agreement we already had with them. If they are right, then this was a manufactured crisis by the admin for the sole purpose of giving gullible lemmings like you a giant nativist boner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
They were explicit. They didn't like that the deportees were shackled, which they claimed violated the deportation agreement we already had with them. If they are right, then this was a manufactured crisis by the admin for the sole purpose of giving gullible lemmings like you a giant nativist boner.
Sounds like some BS lip service from the Colombians. How do they know passengers are shackeled on a plane in the air. They have a live feed?

There’s a gullible one in this conversation for sure, it’s not me.

Colombians tried to make a political statement, they got smacked. End of story.
 
Sounds like some BS lip service from the Colombians. How do they know passengers are shackeled on a plane in the air. They have a live feed?

There’s a gullible one in this conversation for sure, it’s not me.

Colombians tried to make a political statement, they got smacked. End of story.
They were shackled when they got on the plane. There was video. Another problem with Trump waving his dick around like a jackass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Sounds like some BS lip service from the Colombians. How do they know passengers are shackeled on a plane in the air. They have a live feed?

There’s a gullible one in this conversation for sure, it’s not me.

Colombians tried to make a political statement, they got smacked. End of story.
You want the live in a world where Trump is always the strong man, only the US wins, and every other country is weak/wrong. That's because you only think 2 dimensionally. Some of you will start to see the impact of rash decisions in the coming months.

You'll wonder why there is no one to pick your vegetables, build your house, landscape your property, and clean your hotel room. Then you'll say something witty like force food stamps recipients to fill these jobs. It's who you are. And meanwhile costs will climb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
And Columbia responded by hitting US imports with 25 percent tariffs. Going to get interesting. I know this is all fun and games to you, but there are real world economic impacts to all of this as you are about to find out.
In this particular instance, they’d have far more to lose than we do.

Exports and imports with Colombia are pretty much in balance. But they represent a tiny fraction of our GDP, and a fairly significant fraction of theirs.

One little country like that can’t win a trade war with us. It’s a rowboat versus a battleship.

They really shouldn’t have turned that plane around. Fell right into Trump’s trap.
 
In this particular instance, they’d have far more to lose than we do.

Exports and imports with Colombia are pretty much in balance. But they represent a tiny fraction of our GDP, and a fairly significant fraction of theirs.

One little country like that can’t win a trade war with us. It’s a rowboat versus a battleship.

They really shouldn’t have turned that plane around. Fell right into Trump’s trap.
Agree 100 percent at the individual country level. But if we continue to treat regions of the world with disrespect, you will see alliances form in trade that exclude us. Then the paper cuts will start to add up.

We are not the only country with pride. Remember the farm bailouts during Trump's first term?
 
Agree 100 percent at the individual country level. But if we continue to treat regions of the world with disrespect, you will see alliances form in trade that exclude us. Then the paper cuts will start to add up.

We are not the only country with pride. Remember the farm bailouts during Trump's first term?
I don't think we are remotely there yet, but this is a very real concern long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCCHoosier
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT