ADVERTISEMENT

The arms in the 'armed insurrection'

DANC

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
41,763
49,937
113
"By any current American standard of civil disorder, what happened on Jan. 6 was a riot. There were some instigators, and there were many more followers. A small number were anticipating a fight, probably with antifa. And as the day went on, some people lost their heads and did things they should regret for a very long time. But a look at the Justice Department prosecutions simply does not make the case that it was an "armed insurrection."

 
"By any current American standard of civil disorder, what happened on Jan. 6 was a riot. There were some instigators, and there were many more followers. A small number were anticipating a fight, probably with antifa. And as the day went on, some people lost their heads and did things they should regret for a very long time. But a look at the Justice Department prosecutions simply does not make the case that it was an "armed insurrection."

You like the Washington Examiner, huh?

Heah go: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/trump-proven-unfit-for-power-again
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
You understand the difference between reporting the news and an editorial, right?
Of course.

Do you understand the editorial allegiances of The Washington Examiner? It's right of center.

And I would note that the piece you linked is political analysis, not reporting, for the purpose of arguing that no charges should be brought for "armed insurrection." In effect, it's an editorial too.
 
Of course.

Do you understand the editorial allegiances of The Washington Examiner? It's right of center.

And I would note that the piece you linked is political analysis, not reporting, for the purpose of arguing that no charges should be brought for "armed insurrection." In effect, it's an editorial too.
You understand an editorial does not equal analysis, right?
 
Of course.

Do you understand the editorial allegiances of The Washington Examiner? It's right of center.

And I would note that the piece you linked is political analysis, not reporting, for the purpose of arguing that no charges should be brought for "armed insurrection." In effect, it's an editorial too.
You're pissing up a rope.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT