Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
I say no…we can’t afford it
Tax Increases!!!Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
Tax Increases!!!
They’ll extend it.Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
Hopefully. I don’t want to lose that 20 percentThey’ll extend it.
I’m done paying more taxes. Been paying them since I was 14. Let the young guys like UncleMark take up the slack.Hopefully. I don’t want to lose that 20 percent
They shouldn't, but they will. And they will pretend that the economic stimulus resulting from it will somehow increase revenues.Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
What stimulus? They're already baked in.They shouldn't, but they will. And they will pretend that the economic stimulus resulting from it will somehow increase revenues.
The future growth that is loss from taking the capital from private hands. Companies will invest less and consumers will consume less. Both lead to less growth.What stimulus? They're already baked in.
You know, dollars are somehow more active and useful if they are in the hands of the rich, rather than the people who actually need to spend them.What stimulus? They're already baked in.
Wealthier billionaires should be everyone's top priority. Nothing drives the economy like all the wealth in the hands of a few.They shouldn't, but they will. And they will pretend that the economic stimulus resulting from it will somehow increase revenues.
Some of it should be extended and made permanent.They shouldn't, but they will. And they will pretend that the economic stimulus resulting from it will somehow increase revenues.
The new Goat is as dumb as the old Goat.You know, dollars are somehow more active and useful if they are in the hands of the rich, rather than the people who actually need to spend them.
It’ll be extended, no doubt. Should it be extended is another question. Once DOGE does it’s thing we should be able to afford it.Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
It has already worked for Musk, Dogecoin went way up. So it did what he wanted.It’ll be extended, no doubt. Should it be extended is another question. Once DOGE does it’s thing we should be able to afford it.
Doge hasn’t yet started to run. This isn’t financial advice.It has already worked for Musk, Dogecoin went way up. So it did what he wanted.
Absolutely they will.Most of it is set to expire. Will Pubs extend it?
I say no…we can’t afford it
Tax cuts are the best stimulus because they unleash the American people to do what they do and that is to go after their dreamsThey shouldn't, but they will. And they will pretend that the economic stimulus resulting from it will somehow increase revenues.
#Tax El DradoWealthier billionaires should be everyone's top priority. Nothing drives the economy like all the wealth in the hands of a few.
That's not responsive. They will still increase deficits. Do you care about deficits? I don't, to be honest. I'm starting to care more about them, as they are getting so big they are hard to ignore. But if you care about deficits, you can't just cheer on tax cuts without facing up to the consequences.Tax cuts are the best stimulus because they unleash the American people to do what they do and that is to go after their dreams
Pelosian in its brilliance…It has already worked for Musk, Dogecoin went way up. So it did what he wanted.
I do care about deficits. Spending that is runaway is the major culprit.That's not responsive. They will still increase deficits. Do you care about deficits? I don't, to be honest. I'm starting to care more about them, as they are getting so big they are hard to ignore. But if you care about deficits, you can't just cheer on tax cuts without facing up to the consequences.
Why make it worse with tax cuts, though? Wouldn't the responsible thing to do be to balance the books before giving up more revenues?I do care about deficits. Spending that is runaway is the major culprit.
They’re not cutting any taxes, Goat.Why make it worse with tax cuts, though? Wouldn't the responsible thing to do be to balance the books before giving up more revenues?
I'm just responding to Van's general argument, here. Has nothing to do with the semantics involved with TCJA extensions.They’re not cutting any taxes, Goat.
Accept it has everything to do with it. Why does the government get to increase spending? Why make it worse? Wouldn’t the responsible thing be to keep spending the same or cut it?I'm just responding to Van's general argument, here. Has nothing to do with the semantics involved with TCJA extensions.
If you care that much about deficits, absolutely. But, as I'm saying to VPM, if that's really important to you, then you make those cuts and get that spending down before you talk about increasing deficits with tax cuts.Accept it has everything to do with it. Why does the government get to increase spending? Why make it worse? Wouldn’t the responsible thing be to keep spending the same or cut it?
Deficits aren’t the only thing conservatives care about. I care about having the smallest possible government and Republicans getting re-elected to set policy. How does raising taxes to meet increased government spending accomplish those goals?If you care that much about deficits, absolutely. But, as I'm saying to VPM, if that's really important to you, then you make those cuts and get that spending down before you talk about increasing deficits with tax cuts.
It doesn't. But again, I'm only responding to VPM's strange comment to me about how awesome tax cuts are. I had simply made a comment that I expected them to be extended, and for the politicians to sell us the standard BS that they would be so economically stimulating, that they would actually increase revenues. VPM chose to respond with some basic platitudes about why tax cuts are the bees knees. I'm simply drilling down into how non-responsive his post to me was.Deficits aren’t the only thing conservatives care about. I care about having the smallest possible government and Republicans getting re-elected to set policy. How does raising taxes to meet increased government spending accomplish those goals?
Tax cuts every time they are done bring more money into the treasury. The problem is we don't hold the politician's feet to the fire to not spend the new found money. What you have to understand is the freedom tax cuts bring to the individual is good for the treasury because it stimulates the economy. The economy can grow or shrink depending upon government policy.Why make it worse with tax cuts, though? Wouldn't the responsible thing to do be to balance the books before giving up more revenues?
No, they absolutely do not, but thank you for finally getting around to the nonsense I predicted at the beginning.Tax cuts every time they are done bring more money into the treasury.
Tax cuts every time they are done bring more money into the treasury. The problem is we don't hold the politician's feet to the fire to not spend the new found money. What you have to understand is the freedom tax cuts bring to the individual is good for the treasury because it stimulates the economy. The economy can grow or shrink depending upon government policy.
I am a pastor near Fort Wayne.Yo Van, what are you doing for work nowadays?
I am a pastor near Fort Wayne.
When your work is in service of the lord you’re never out of workGood. I was afraid you might be out of work.
Better gig? Bigger flock?