He’s like a crazy black cat with red eyes..creepyLol. Whore. (Edited - Seriously? Everybody is so up tight)
He’s like a crazy black cat with red eyes..creepyLol. Whore. (Edited - Seriously? Everybody is so up tight)
I think you meant Kaleb Banks.Nothing against Bates, but I really liked what I saw from Kyle Banks last night! FT shooting especially. I think he should be in line to get some of TBs minutes!
really, what grade school did you go to? Not sure I knew what a douche was until college. Douche and douchey are also regularly used on here to avoid curse words... as is the "ugly" word you find so offensive. Attention... umm, ...seeker? Has been a well-used term on all our boards for years, and in no way relates to the original meaning. Searching, umm,.. the term for "comfort woman" yields over 10 pages of results, most probably on the cooler and OTF, but a significant portion also on this and the football boards."Douchey"? Sounds like a very popular word among grade-schoolers, but it does express an opinion in a quasi-civilized manner without recourse to name-calling.
The thread wasn't about the win, it was about Tamar, and it was about Tamar after four games, not just one.
"Whore" is not remotely "regularly used" on this Forum nor should it be. This is not the Cooler/OTF, nor should it become so...
1. I don't think so. He's already showing he has improved his body and overall game and can do other things and from what I've seen his offensive game is mid-range, transition and going to the basket. I agree with others: too many flaws in his shot (not square, feet askew, flat shot,...) for him to shoot at that level imo. You like to bet and I don't like to bet against Hoosiers, but I don't think his 3 pt shooting is what will make or break him for this team. You pick a reasonable minimum # of 3s (70?), and I don't think he'll get to 38%. We only had 2 guys above that last year. I'd only bet because I don't feel like I'm betting "against" him, because I think he'll contribute in other ways. Not a big better... $100 (that's a big bet for me!)? For a great season, I could lose $100 and still feel happy!Tamars season success on this board will for sure only be determined by his three point shooting ability. I bet on 38.7% at seasons end.
Ill bet you he shoots over 100, and 38%. $100 bucks. And when he finishes at 36.8 and has 124 ill gladly give u a Franklin. It will be close to it for sure. Over 35% ill bet a shit ton on.1. I don't think so. He's already showing he has improved his body and overall game and can do other things and from what I've seen his offensive game is mid-range, transition and going to the basket. I agree with others: too many flaws in his shot (not square, feet askew, flat shot,...) for him to shoot at that level imo. You like to bet and I don't like to bet against Hoosiers, but I don't think his 3 pt shooting is what will make or break him for this team. You pick a reasonable minimum # of 3s (70?), and I don't think he'll get to 38%. We only had 2 guys above that last year. I'd only bet because I don't feel like I'm betting "against" him, because I think he'll contribute in other ways. Not a big better... $100 (that's a big bet for me!)? For a great season, I could lose $100 and still feel happy!
Went ahead and switched to Youtube TV last night. Gets me BTN, ACC, SEC, FS1, FS2 and local channels and PBS. Seems a great deal at $65 and I can add like 5 other people (3 concurrent streams I think) to my account.
is this forum associated with indiana university?Really? Show us. "Troll" to be sure, not the other. Very ugly word, unworthy of any association with Indiana University.
If he carves a good spot in the rotation and is making at that rate, I could see him getting to 100. I think 35% is probably about what I'd hope for. He shot around 30% last year I think, and he looks much better to me, but his shot just to me looks too flawed for a knock down shooter. Hope I'm 100% wrong.Ill bet you he shoots over 100, and 38%. $100 bucks. And when he finishes at 36.8 and has 124 ill gladly give u a Franklin. It will be close to it for sure. Over 35% ill bet a shit ton on.
so 100 bucks?If he carves a good spot in the rotation and is making at that rate, I could see him getting to 100. I think 35% is probably about what I'd hope for. He shot around 30% last year I think, and he looks much better to me, but his shot just to me looks too flawed for a knock down shooter. Hope I'm 100% wrong.
I find that wholly plausible, but then today's youth is quite a bit worldlier than they were in the Jurassic. Ta.Not sure I knew what a douche was until college. Douche and douchey are also regularly used on here to avoid curse words... as is the "ugly" word you find so offensive. Attention... umm, ...seeker? Has been a well-used term on all our boards for years, and in no way relates to the original meaning. Searching, umm,.. the term for "comfort woman" yields over 10 pages of results, most probably on the cooler and OTF, but a significant portion also on this and the football boards.
No more than IU BB. Don't be obtuse.is this forum associated with indiana university?
Watching Geronimo and Galloway you can see they are now playing much more under control. The game has mentally slowed down for them. I think Tamar is on that same path, playing more under control, letting the game come to him. He has great potential to be a star player, it's just going to take time, which is fine. He brought great energy last night and is improving. He's starting to get it.So starting a thread titled "Tamar Bates is overrated" during the second game of the year up 50 is a thread of substance?
Maybe the reason I've been "AWOL since June" and many others don't post here at all anymore is because of threads like this.
Bates is still trying to find his confidence after his death in the family last year where he hasn't quite been the same since. He's had flashes but he's not quite there yet, I agree with that.
If OP had framed it that way I would've had no problem with it.
Calling Tamar overrated in the title with no reasoning in the subject is the very definition of "lack of substance". It does nothing for the kid and makes our fanbase look bad.
Maybe on strictly catch and shoot 3s and close to the line. Lots of things need to change for him to be a consistent scorer from deep. He’s getting plenty of run and players and coaches are talking him up. Hoping he picks it up.Tamars season success on this board will for sure only be determined by his three point shooting ability. I bet on 38.7% at seasons end.
I know we play 30+ games but do we really want TB to shoot 100 three's this season? Seems like that is too many with all of our scoring options, to include TB going hard to the rim.Ill bet you he shoots over 100, and 38%. $100 bucks. And when he finishes at 36.8 and has 124 ill gladly give u a Franklin. It will be close to it for sure. Over 35% ill bet a shit ton on.
I'd say only if he's making at a 35% rate or better. Otherwise, I think CMW will begin to reign in his 3 pt shooting.I know we play 30+ games but do we really want TB to shoot 100 three's this season? Seems like that is too many with all of our scoring options, to include TB going hard to the rim.
I could see that # next season.
Incorrect. IUBB belongs to IUNo more than IU BB. Don't be obtuse.
To call a woman "whore" is the cry of male chauvinist pig. Its degrading to the feminist movement. To "whore" is to bully, having no place in Woke Nation. Less offensive to others is to say "lady of the evening liking to f*ck your socks off.""Whore" is not remotely "regularly used" on this Forum nor should it be. This is not the Cooler/OTF, nor should it become so...
what if she likes it?To call a woman "whore" is the cry of male chauvinist pig. Its degrading to the feminist movement. To "whore" is to bully, having no place in Woke Nation. Less offensive to others is to say "lady of the evening liking to f*ck your socks off."
Taking that would be tantamount to stealing...Ill bet you he shoots over 100, and 38%. $100 bucks. And when he finishes at 36.8 and has 124 ill gladly give u a Franklin. It will be close to it for sure. Over 35% ill bet a shit ton on.
Judging by this thread title I hope notis this forum associated with indiana university?
Then I would say she's in the right profession and "Now, if you'll kindly just bend over this time."what if she likes it?
I made 800 last night on IU, Ill be ok./.Taking that would be tantamount to stealing...
Right now his footwork is off and his release is too low...(for starters)... He's lined up to klang it off the side off the rim 90% of the time with that ugly shooting style...
Keep your money and put it towards getting him a personal shooting coach...
He’s good. He just has a case of “hero ballitis.” Hopefully he can overcome his ego, so that he can help us.
My $0.02 on Tamar, with regards to where he stands right now...I do see confidence mentioned quite a bit with him. There was a post last year before the season started saying he was NBA bound because he was the most confident player in the history of IU basketball. When he struggled last year confidence was cited.
another poster up in this thread gave their 2 cents that any issues were between the ears, and I think they are on to something.
Right now he’s behind Galloway in the “dawg” mentality. He’s behind Galloway as a defender. He’s behind Galloway as a rebounder. He’s behind Galloway as a willing distributor.My $0.02 on Tamar, with regards to where he stands right now...
He's not an elite shooter. He's not an elite ball handler or passer. He's not an elite athlete. He's not an elite defender, on the ball or off the ball. He hasn't shown that he's an elite rebounder out of the guard positions. And when I say "Elite" I mean in reference to his peers in the B10.
What he is though, is really solid at all those things. That gives him a versatility and value to most any team. And with our team specifically...he'll be a valuable bench guy because he can come in and help our backcourt guys handle the ball if necessary. He can come in and help spell Kopp on the wing. He's long enough that if we want/need him to defend/offend against a perimeter oriented "4" man in a 4 guard lineup, he can effectively do that.
When you take all of it in total...he could end up putting himself into "elite" overall impact territory. But he needs to really double down on the "dawg" mentality and become a lock down defender, a good rebounder, and a willing distributor.
I see Tamar's easiest path to "Elite" being him becoming a 10, 6, 5, 4...type of guy. He needs to embrace that mindset though. I think as of now, he thinks he's a "sniper" or instant offense kind of guy. And I just don't see that in him right now.
Agreed. Actually might even be behind Galloway as a shooter/scorer, right now too. I think the shooting/scoring thing will probably take care of itself. Bates, I think, is naturally a better shooter and scorer than Galloway is. But you're right, Trey is probably outplaying Tamar right now in the areas Tamar needs to really take it to the next level in. Which is great for the team! And it'll be even better when Tamar kicks it into gear as well.Right now he’s behind Galloway in the “dawg” mentality. He’s behind Galloway as a defender. He’s behind Galloway as a rebounder. He’s behind Galloway as a willing distributor.
Where Tamar ends up in these facets is up to Tamar. He has the ability and also a good example on the team.
I thought Johnson looked very fast last night when he turned on the jets to the basket.Who said “can’t miss stud?”
How’d Xavier play tonight? My answer would be he controlled the game when he was in. The PG position is always about more than stats.
I think he is still a bit uncomfortable still putting pressure on himself. I am hoping he gets comfortable and believe he will when he trusts his abilities.