ADVERTISEMENT

SOS: Maybe SEC just having 2 down years

Army88

Junior
Gold Member
Jul 7, 2012
1,161
1,341
113
What if Saban foresaw a weak team, and that’s why he retired! What if ALL SEC is weaker, or simply parity as a result of NIL.
If SEC so strong, why did the Big 10 (Michigan and now Big10 Washington) beat both SEC schools (Alabama and now SEC Texas) in last year’s Championship SemiFinals?
This year, Alabama lost to Vandy! If IU played Vandy and won, would that help IU’s SOS?
Tenn lost to 5-5 Arkansas
Ole Miss lost to 4-6 Kentucky
Notre Dame (obviously not SEC) lost to 6-5 Northern Illinois, but if IU beat Northern Illinois, would that help their SOS?
IU beat the 2 teams in last year’s championship.
 
Last edited:
It's simple. In the initial rankings to start the season, the SEC had 9 teams in the top 20. The B1G had 4. Therefore, any SEC conf win was considered a great win and any loss wasn't a bad loss. Even though LSU lost to USC and Texas A&M lost to ND, it was considered "good" losses at the time due to high rankings that didn't really hurt them. So we've been fighting the inaccurate and outdated SEC bias in the polls. Texas got MASSIVE credit for beating Michigan. Alabama got big credit for beating Wisconsin by the exact same score as Iowa did.

The point is, I hope we get SEC teams in the playoffs. Overrated.
 
What if Saban foresaw a weak team, and that’s why he retired! What if ALL SEC is weaker, or simply parity as a result of NIL.
If SEC so strong, why did the Big 10 (Michigan and now Big10 Washington) beat both SEC schools (Alabama and now SEC Texas) in last year’s Championship SemiFinals?
This year, Alabama lost to Vandy! If IU played Vandy and won, would that help IU’s SOS?
Tenn lost to 5-5 Arkansas
Ole Miss lost to 4-6 Kentucky
Notre Dame (obviously not SEC) lost to 6-5 Northern Illinois, but if IU beat Northern Illinois, would that help their SOS?
IU beat the 2 teams in last year’s championship.
It's rigged, homie
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT