ADVERTISEMENT

So if IU takes both Goode and Leal,,

Tru2Irish

Senior
Aug 2, 2013
2,392
1,265
113
I guess we play Freddie McSwain ball if bigs get in foul trouble. If IU has outside shooting slumps, and bigs in foul trouble, it gonna be not so good.
 
I guess we play Freddie McSwain ball if bigs get in foul trouble. If IU has outside shooting slumps, and bigs in foul trouble, it gonna be not so good.
Freddie was undersized but he was strong and had a lot of heart. I used to love watching him come out of the scrum with big rebounds. Now, I realize having an FM as your 5 is not a good business model, but I loved watching him play.
 
What is puzzling to me is that this roster is tailor-made for a dominant interior player. The strength of the perimeter shooters should open up the paint. This roster should appeal to bigs, not discourage them. I do hope that DeVries isn't done. While we won't necessarily land an elite inside player....with the shooters around him...he doesn't have to be elite to be effective.
 
What is puzzling to me is that this roster is tailor-made for a dominant interior player. The strength of the perimeter shooters should open up the paint. This roster should appeal to bigs, not discourage them. I do hope that DeVries isn't done. While we won't necessarily land an elite inside player....with the shooters around him...he doesn't have to be elite to be effective.
Pretty clear DD doesn’t want a 7 footer unless he can shoot and move. He is fine throwing out 6’8 dudes against anyone. That is where modern basketball is, so let’s roll.

3s are worth more than 2s, everything about roster construction screams that is his number one priority.
 
Pretty clear DD doesn’t want a 7 footer unless he can shoot and move. He is fine throwing out 6’8 dudes against anyone. That is where modern basketball is, so let’s roll.

3s are worth more than 2s, everything about roster construction screams that is his number one priority.

What level of modern basketball you’re referring to? The NBA?

The level of skill at the NBA level is far superior to anything you will see in college. Size and an inside presence still matter at this level. How many Final Four teams over the last 4-5 years didn’t play a center? How many teams playing small have seriously competed for titles in the BigTen?

Illinois, Maryland both tried winning small… didn’t work out very well.
 
What level of modern basketball you’re referring to? The NBA?

The level of skill at the NBA level is far superior to anything you will see in college. Size and an inside presence still matter at this level. How many Final Four teams over the last 4-5 years didn’t play a center? How many teams playing small have seriously competed for titles in the BigTen?

Illinois, Maryland both tried winning small… didn’t work out very well.
College. Best 2 defenses in the country just did it. Houston and the fighting strippers. Dude it’s all over the place in college now. 7 footers only play if they are elite or can shoot for good teams now.
 
College. Best 2 defenses in the country just did it. Houston and the fighting strippers. Dude it’s all over the place in college now. 7 footers only play if they are elite or can shoot for good teams now.

Florida, UConn, Purdue, Auburn, Duke, MSU, Michigan etc etc all had bigs. You don’t need 7 foot but you will need at least 6’ 10” to win at the college level. Unless you’re just incredibly athletic like Houston. We’re certainly not that.
 
Florida, UConn, Purdue, Auburn, Duke, MSU, Michigan etc etc all had bigs. You don’t need 7 foot but you will need at least 6’ 10” to win at the college level. Unless you’re just incredibly athletic like Houston. We’re certainly not that.
Bailey is 6,10 and similar to MI bigs. They both could shoot and move.
 
Pretty clear DD doesn’t want a 7 footer unless he can shoot and move. He is fine throwing out 6’8 dudes against anyone. That is where modern basketball is, so let’s roll.

3s are worth more than 2s, everything about roster construction screams that is his number one priority.
It's going to be fun to watch the fan base absorb the change of style. Modern basketball hasn't been played by IU in decades. Dudes that guard the nose off your face, run, and shoot... can't wait.
 
What level of modern basketball you’re referring to? The NBA?

The level of skill at the NBA level is far superior to anything you will see in college. Size and an inside presence still matter at this level. How many Final Four teams over the last 4-5 years didn’t play a center? How many teams playing small have seriously competed for titles in the BigTen?

Illinois, Maryland both tried winning small… didn’t work out very well.
Cue The Office.

“Size and an inside presence still matter at this level”. That’s what she said.
 
What is puzzling to me is that this roster is tailor-made for a dominant interior player. The strength of the perimeter shooters should open up the paint. This roster should appeal to bigs, not discourage them. I do hope that DeVries isn't done. While we won't necessarily land an elite inside player....with the shooters around him...he doesn't have to be elite to be effective.
I can't imagine why CDD wouldn't want a big to rebound and defend. Anytime IU has had great success, they have had a decent center. Just baffling!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bailey777
It's going to be fun to watch the fan base absorb the change of style. Modern basketball hasn't been played by IU in decades. Dudes that guard the nose off your face, run, and shoot... can't wait.
I don't see great defenders other than Conerway with this group. We shall see.
 
Pretty clear DD doesn’t want a 7 footer unless he can shoot and move. He is fine throwing out 6’8 dudes against anyone. That is where modern basketball is, so let’s roll.

3s are worth more than 2s, everything about roster construction screams that is his number one priority.
Soooooo. IU has 2 guys at 6'8" and 1 at 6'10". Any foul trouble and they are in huge trouble.Not well thought out.
 
Rivals

I don't see great defenders other than Conerway with this group. We shall see.
fwiw - I highly doubt you see much at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hickorytree1
Soooooo. IU has 2 guys at 6'8" and 1 at 6'10". Any foul trouble and they are in huge trouble.Not well thought out.
So was this roster in trouble?
PositionHeightClass
F6'7"Senior
C6'11"Junior
G6'3"Senior
G-F6'7"Senior
F6'7" Senior
G6'5"Senior
G-F6'3"Sophomore
G6'2"Sophomore
G6'3"Freshman
F6'5"Freshman
F-C6'8"Sophomore
F-C6'9"Freshman
F6'9"Freshman
 
So was this roster in trouble?
PositionHeightClass
F6'7"Senior
C6'11"Junior
G6'3"Senior
G-F6'7"Senior
F6'7"Senior
G6'5"Senior
G-F6'3"Sophomore
G6'2"Sophomore
G6'3"Freshman
F6'5"Freshman
F-C6'8"Sophomore
F-C6'9"Freshman
F6'9"Freshman

How athletic was that roster? Could they rebound and defend better than just about everyone in the country?
 
WHO WERE THEY COACHED BY??? Was this the 1985 team? I see you won't use names on roster so I know the 2002 team was bigger than that and didn't have two 6'9 frosh. I doubt it was TJD team. My point was the best IU teams had decent frontcourt who could withstand any foul trouble. The only 6-3 forward would be AJ Moye or Wayne Radford that I recall.
 
Bailey is 6,10 and similar to MI bigs. They both could shoot and move.
I think Wulf is a decent comp for Bailey, but not Goldin. Yes, he was comfortable on the perimeter but he was also 7'1" and a pretty rugged interior player on D and the glass. Not Bailey's rep.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT