Russia is definitely going to invade Ukraine, if that's what you're asking.just posturing or is this really something to worry about
you think so? how do you think the west will and should respond?Russia is definitely going to invade Ukraine, if that's what you're asking.
Russia will invade if there are no strong leaders who step up and stop them. They have every intention to invade.just posturing or is this really something to worry about
Probably sanctions and stationing more troops in NATO members in the Balkans as a sign of solidarity.you think so? how do you think the west will and should respond?
is Russia's goal to make Ukraine a part of Russia or to put in a puppet regime that answers to Russia. One of the conservatives above made some comment about nobody standing up to Russia, which was a typical response, unless we have the will to defend Ukraine what can we do to stop Russia. I'm not convinced an invasion if a foregone conclusion, will open a whole can of worms internationallyProbably sanctions and stationing more troops in NATO members in the Balkans as a sign of solidarity.
I think Russia's primary goal is to keep Ukraine in its sphere of influence. However, I also heard Vindman on NPR this week suggest a secondary goal: making Ukraine a failed state, because having a successful democracy in a neighboring country would undermine Putin's authority. As such, it's in Putin's interest to have fellow autocrats in charge in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc. Not sure how much I buy that one.is Russia's goal to make Ukraine a part of Russia or to put in a puppet regime that answers to Russia. One of the conservatives above made some comment about nobody standing up to Russia, which was a typical response, unless we have the will to defend Ukraine what can we do to stop Russia. I'm not convinced an invasion if a foregone conclusion, will open a whole can of worms internationally
Doesn’t it matter how far they intend to invade? I’ve met several Crimeans in my life and they all consider themselves Russians.I think Russia's primary goal is to keep Ukraine in its sphere of influence. However, I also heard Vindman on NPR this week suggest a secondary goal: making Ukraine a failed state, because having a successful democracy in a neighboring country would undermine Putin's authority. As such, it's in Putin's interest to have fellow autocrats in charge in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc. Not sure how much I buy that one.
I think they also fear Ukraine being aligned with the west. From Russia's historical perspective they are surrounded. Ukraine really eliminates their buffer.I think Russia's primary goal is to keep Ukraine in its sphere of influence. However, I also heard Vindman on NPR this week suggest a secondary goal: making Ukraine a failed state, because having a successful democracy in a neighboring country would undermine Putin's authority. As such, it's in Putin's interest to have fellow autocrats in charge in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc. Not sure how much I buy that one.
Matter to whom and for what purpose? From a purely intellectual point of view, sure, I guess. It's not hard to argue that Russia had a historical claim to Crimea, and you could extend that thinking to some sort of cultural claim to eastern Ukraine, as well. But I really doubt there's a line Russia could cross that would suddenly invoke a serious response from the West. I think if Russia truly wanted to conquer the entire country, they'd probably get away with it.Doesn’t it matter how far they intend to invade? I’ve met several Crimeans in my life and they all consider themselves Russians.
AgreedMatter to whom and for what purpose? From a purely intellectual point of view, sure, I guess. It's not hard to argue that Russia had a historical claim to Crimea, and you could extend that thinking to some sort of cultural claim to eastern Ukraine, as well. But I really doubt there's a line Russia could cross that would suddenly invoke a serious response from the West. I think if Russia truly wanted to conquer the entire country, they'd probably get away with it.
Yes, Russia has long felt that the Caucasus, Ukraine, eastern Europe, the Baltics, and Finland belong in their empire, whether as de jure parts of it, or technically independent states under their thumb. NATO has been encroaching on their putative empire for years, now, and they've decided that Ukraine would be a step too far.I think they also fear Ukraine being aligned with the west. From Russia's historical perspective they are surrounded. Ukraine really eliminates their buffer.
Cuba unhinged us, I can imagine what NATO in Ukraine or Baltic States must do to the Russian psyche.Yes, Russia has long felt that the Caucasus, Ukraine, eastern Europe, the Baltics, and Finland belong in their empire, whether as de jure parts of it, or technically independent states under their thumb. NATO has been encroaching on their putative empire for years, now, and they've decided that Ukraine would be a step too far.
What's the pretext?Matter to whom and for what purpose? From a purely intellectual point of view, sure, I guess. It's not hard to argue that Russia had a historical claim to Crimea, and you could extend that thinking to some sort of cultural claim to eastern Ukraine, as well. But I really doubt there's a line Russia could cross that would suddenly invoke a serious response from the West. I think if Russia truly wanted to conquer the entire country, they'd probably get away with it.
Edit to add: I really doubt Russia's gameplan here is to annex anything else. I think they will invade Ukraine and replace the government with something more to their liking.
Maybe the Europeans could step up and help out Ukraine?Ukraine isn’t exactly armed with bows and arrows, so I don’t particularly think Russia wants to invade. At the same time, no one from the West, not the least of which is the USA, has the stomach for an actual war with Russia over Ukraine. So for now it’s a staring contest. Unfortunately, we’re going into a staring contest with a SoS named Blinken.
Probably western interference in some form or another. Russia will end up liberating Ukraine from corrupt American imperialists.What's the pretext?
Well. . .Probably western interference in some form or another. Russia will end up liberating Ukraine from corrupt American imperialists.
They could, but they don't want to get involved in a war any more than anyone else does.Maybe the Europeans could step up and help out Ukraine?
Is he often right? If he is, he's waaaaay more often wrong. He made his bones with Pizzagate & Seth Rich conspiracies. And it didn't end there by any stretch of the imagination.I know some on here think he is a right wing nut but he is often right. Now I cannot really see how a military conflict would help Biden as most in the USA are sick of wars. It will be interesting to see what happens.
Jack Posobiec
The Biden Administration has negative political capital. They are desperate. And desperate people do desperate things. Internally they are discussing military options in Eastern Europe. Wag the Dog begins.
So you follow him daily I take it? I have been following him for like a year and yes he has been right alot of the time and I do not consider him trash. Do you consider Joy Reid and her theories trash? She basically said Kristen Sinema " the white woman" was all about white supremacy last night. She refers to her as " the white woman". Is that real journalism to you?Is he often right? If he is, he's waaaaay more often wrong. He made his bones with Pizzagate & Seth Rich conspiracies. And it didn't end there by any stretch of the imagination.
He's got background in military intelligence I believe, so he might be on target with something like what's going on in Eastern Europe. But on the whole, he's trash and emblematic of the worst kind of politics.
You quoted CNN I am not sure what he will say now. CNN is like the gold standard to liberals.He's not wrong. Biden is extremely desperate. Bad things are almost guaranteed to happen. Chaos and tyranny are the only moves the Dems have left.
First on CNN: US intelligence indicates Russia preparing operation to justify invasion of Ukraine
The US has information that indicates Russia has prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct a false-flag operation in eastern Ukraine, a US official told CNN on Friday, in an attempt to create a pretext for an invasion.www.cnn.com
I personally can't stand Joy Reid.So you follow him daily I take it? I have been following him for like a year and yes he has been right alot of the time and I do not consider him trash. Do you consider Joy Reid and her theories trash? She basically said Kristen Sinema " the white woman" was all about white supremacy last night. She refers to her as " the white woman". Is that real journalism to you?
You quoted CNN I am not sure what he will say now. CNN is like the gold standard to liberals.
Actually military analysts don't take him seriously, either. Bailey and others like him for his opinions, but when it comes to reporting facts, he's never right. Most people think he's just making stuff up.Is he often right? If he is, he's waaaaay more often wrong. He made his bones with Pizzagate & Seth Rich conspiracies. And it didn't end there by any stretch of the imagination.
He's got background in military intelligence I believe, so he might be on target with something like what's going on in Eastern Europe. But on the whole, he's trash and emblematic of the worst kind of politics.
Militarily? Sure there is. We are still the most powerful nation in the world. If Russia thought we would go to war over Ukraine, they wouldn't be doing this.I was just speaking with someone who gives lectures to the alphabet agencies and the military on foreign conflicts. He said Putin was simply wanting to be seen as restoring Russia to it's former greatness. Ukraine is critical to that. Sanctions can make it costly but the Europeans want that pipeline. That makes sanctions less costly. To go down in history as creating the next Russian empire means a lot to Putin and militarily there isn't much we can do.
We could not stop them from taking Ukraine. It has been wargames, along with the Baltic States. They get them and then we have to dislodge them. That is harder. If we want to go into a longer, more protracted war, we could. But that opens up a much more disturbing question, what does China do? What does North Korea do? If we are tied down in Europe, South Korea and Taiwan (Japan?) Could be sacrificed.Militarily? Sure there is. We are still the most powerful nation in the world. If Russia thought we would go to war over Ukraine, they wouldn't be doing this.
Politic will for war here? Let's hope not.
I agree we don’t have war on the table and most presidents, including Trump and Biden, wouldn’t do it.We could not stop them from taking Ukraine. It has been wargames, along with the Baltic States. They get them and then we have to dislodge them. That is harder. If we want to go into a longer, more protracted war, we could. But that opens up a much more disturbing question, what does China do? What does North Korea do? If we are tied down in Europe, South Korea and Taiwan (Japan?) Could be sacrificed.
No way do we have war on the table. No president would.
The West has interfered in Ukrainian affairs. And each side of the political divide in America thinks the other side engaged in corrupt dealings in Ukraine. Re imperialism, a lot of the world (and a lot of Americans) believe we are an empire.That seems a rather odd response.
It’s def understated what a redline Ukraine is for Russia. Kiev is 500 easy miles from Moscow. They would/ will absolutely test NATO’s will. This is primary strategic imperative stuff for Russia. Ukraine either tilts towards them or has to be a failed state. The messages were sent with Crimea and Georgia.the US/Europe has the same problem with Ukraine and Russia, that the working class has with both parties and SCOTUS.
knowing what's in the greater good/best interests, and being able to do anything about it, are two completely different things.
that said, Ukraine isn't Crimea, Russia 2021 isn't the USSR at it height, and not sure Russia wants to bite off more than it can chew.
how has the US done against much weaker countries since WWII.
that said, i have zero idea how the Ukraine citizenry back being part of Russia, and how much they don't, but if they are united against being annexed, i question if Russia would really want to get mired down in that.
that said, "the west" isn't going to war with Russia over Ukraine, and only the US military industrial complex would even think about it..
that said, the west promised not to extend NATO there, and doing so is just looking for trouble and prodding Russia.
that said, "the complex" just loves trouble, or even just the prospect of it.
that said, Russia doesn't want NATO in Ukraine any more than the US wanted nukes in Cuba, and for the same reason.
is talk of adding Ukraine to NATO only prodding Russia to go into Ukraine first?
Washington D.C., December 12, 2017 – U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University (http://nsarchive.gwu.edu).