C clubjockey Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 28, 2001 38,523 1 36 Oct 25, 2007 #1 So we have 14 players... Do we want to add one to make up for losing Stunned? I vote no, but I will not fight to hard over it.
So we have 14 players... Do we want to add one to make up for losing Stunned? I vote no, but I will not fight to hard over it.
H HoosierBacker All-Big Ten Gold Member Sep 25, 2001 4,703 5 38 Fishers, IN Oct 26, 2007 #2 I'm with you 14 sounds good but if the masses want, well more mass then so be it.
Satchmore Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 30, 2001 14,267 35 48 Oct 26, 2007 #3 If we go with 14, what about # of leagues? Do we drop a league, or keep them the same and have more unclaimed teams? For what it's worth I'm for 14 players too. Same reason as CJ said about speeding up the draft. But I won't kick about adding more players either.
If we go with 14, what about # of leagues? Do we drop a league, or keep them the same and have more unclaimed teams? For what it's worth I'm for 14 players too. Same reason as CJ said about speeding up the draft. But I won't kick about adding more players either.
IUTerry Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 28, 2001 16,363 416 83 Durham, NC Oct 29, 2007 #4 Drop a league - I vote to drop the WAC On the grounds that it holds the least inherent interest to a bunch of midwestern Hoosier fans. Even the Mountain West conference is slightly more interesting (Utah, BYU, New Mexico, UNLV, etc.).
Drop a league - I vote to drop the WAC On the grounds that it holds the least inherent interest to a bunch of midwestern Hoosier fans. Even the Mountain West conference is slightly more interesting (Utah, BYU, New Mexico, UNLV, etc.).
Satchmore Hall of Famer Gold Member Aug 30, 2001 14,267 35 48 Nov 5, 2007 #5 I've never picked a good team out of the WAC So I'd be all for killing it too. We'll have to see what everyone else thinks.
I've never picked a good team out of the WAC So I'd be all for killing it too. We'll have to see what everyone else thinks.