Pam Bondi for AG

[BradStevens]

View embedded media

Let's hope they investigate all those dirty judges who threw out all 60-some lawsuits challenging the results:

 

[DANC]

Let's hope they investigate all those dirty judges who threw out all 60-some lawsuits challenging the results:

How about everyone stop saying all the cases were heard?

 

[Aloha Hoosier]

How about everyone stop saying all the cases were heard?

There were no cases to make.

 

[dbmhoosier]

Let's hope they investigate all those dirty judges who threw out all 60-some lawsuits challenging the results:

All for lack of standing. No court anywhere ever addressed the merits.

There is a reason SCOTUS wouldn't hear the case. Because they would've had to rule for Trump.

 

[BradStevens]

All for lack of standing. No court anywhere ever addressed the merits.

There is a reason SCOTUS wouldn't hear the case. Because they would've had to rule for Trump.

Your last paragraph, given the first one, is incoherent.

 

[BradStevens]

All for lack of standing. No court anywhere ever addressed the merits.

There is a reason SCOTUS wouldn't hear the case. Because they would've had to rule for Trump.

You have a law degree, right?

Care to make a wager on whether all 60+ lawsuits were dismissed based on lack of standing? Or do you just want to admit right now you’re wrong about that?

Can’t wait for the DOJ to investigate Bill Barr. Clearly, he was in on the cover up too.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-courts-have-dismissed-multiple-lawsuits-of-alleged-electoral-fraud-p-idUSKBN2AF1FQ/

 

[IUINSB]

View embedded media

Can't be. Waste of money. Musk would shut it down.

 

[outside shooter]

All for lack of standing. No court anywhere ever addressed the merits.

False. Several GOP appointed judges reprimanded the Trump legal teams for bringing meritless, frivolous lawsuits with no basis in fact. Some were threatened with being disbarred. REPUBLICAN-APPOINTED JUDGES, some even appointed by your orange hero.

 

[Aloha Hoosier]

All for lack of standing. No court anywhere ever addressed the merits.

There is a reason SCOTUS wouldn't hear the case. Because they would've had to rule for Trump.

You continue to be the first name on the moron list. I think we should list every moron that still believes, despite absolutely zero evidence, that Trump lost the 2020 election due to voter fraud.

1. dbmhoosier
2. DANC (actually paid to be duped by "2000 Mules," a movie and book meant to fleece dupes)
3. Ty Webb iu (who is degrading Caddy Shack with his name)
4.

If you believe the ridiculous allegation, proudly add your name.

 

[crazed_hoosier2]

You continue to be the first name on the moron list. I think we should list every moron that still believes, despite absolutely zero evidence, that Trump lost the 2016 election due to voter fraud.

1. dbmhoosier
2. DANC (actually paid to be duped by "2000 Mules," a movie and book meant to fleece dupes)
3. Ty Webb iu (who is degrading Caddy Shack with his name)
4.

If you believe the ridiculous allegation, proudly add your name.

(2020, not 2016)

What's funny about this is that even Trump himself has slipped and admitted a couple times that he lost that election. And that's on top of having learned that a number of his own lawyers and top aides knew full well, prior to January 6th, that there was no case to claim election fraud and Biden had won it.

 

[Aloha Hoosier]

(2020, not 2016)

What's funny about this is that even Trump himself has slipped and admitted a couple times that he lost that election. And that's on top of having learned that a number of his own lawyers and top aides knew full well, prior to January 6th, that there was no case to claim election fraud and Biden had won it.

When I linked Trump admitting he legitimately lost, dbm denied it and pitched a fit. Hilarious!