i read the linked original article when i read the OP's linked follow up one.
obviously neither of you trolls did.
absolutely zero specifics as to anything the coach in question said or did in either article.
ZERO.
very bad journalism on the part of the IDS and the authors.
nothing but trolling on you 2's part..
I read the article 3 months ago when it was originally published. I don't know why I'd have to read it to you again, but okay, here goes:
15 of the 25 girls Aird recruited quit, got cut, or transferred.
He runs practices so hard the girls throw up.
He is verbally abusive, screaming at them, calling them stupid.
He suggested two players were playing badly because they were ****ing the same guy.
He asked to see a player's butt tattoo.
5 of the 6 players they interviewed were in counseling after they played for Aird.
Practice video of at least one of his abusive tirades has disappeared.
IU investigated Aird, but cancelled interviews because they had already decided they weren't firing him.
Aird denies some of these allegations.
Enough facts? Am I still a troll? Or, maybe I have a journalism degree and know that, for a student-written article, this is pretty good journalism.
Either way, your claim that the article contains zero specifics about what the coach said or did is simply false. A blatant lie.