ADVERTISEMENT

One Thing Ignored By ESPN Clowns

iubhounds

All-American
Feb 15, 2002
8,527
736
113
I am surprised I made it through the complete show tonight about the CFB rankings. I will not go into detail all we heard. Obvious there is national bias against IU. BUT one thing was appreciated by those 4 clowns when talking to the SMU coach and was NEVER brought up with they were dicing up IU like chopped liver. Each team had something in common.

When asked .. the SMU coach mentioned he had an older team. I cannot remember the exact record he said but that is not the point ... that group of older SMU players won a lot and play confident.

Does that sound familiar? It should because Coach Cig mentioned it yesterday when asked ... older team and our coaches have won 24 of their last 25 games. Those of course count the games at JMU played.

But the 4 ESPN clowns never brought up that fact about IU, only went on and on about a weak schedule. You would think the B1G was ranked lower than the Mountain West listening to them. Galloway can go f*** himself but at least McFarland squeezed in "If IU loses a close game they are in the playoffs".... IMO IU wins this game.

The ESPN clowns will be speechless next week. I like what the UM AD said though ... "we watch games and what takes place on the field." ... but two of the ESPN clowns seem to want SOS to count more than what happens on the field !!!!

Screw 'em all and just win out. One game at a time, coaches and players that are use to winning .. and apparently have the ability to shut out all the noise. Even dumbass Galloway said IU had to keep their QB from getting hurt otherwise it is FSU all over again.
 
I am surprised I made it through the complete show tonight about the CFB rankings. I will not go into detail all we heard. Obvious there is national bias against IU. BUT one thing was appreciated by those 4 clowns when talking to the SMU coach and was NEVER brought up with they were dicing up IU like chopped liver. Each team had something in common.

When asked .. the SMU coach mentioned he had an older team. I cannot remember the exact record he said but that is not the point ... that group of older SMU players won a lot and play confident.

Does that sound familiar? It should because Coach Cig mentioned it yesterday when asked ... older team and our coaches have won 24 of their last 25 games. Those of course count the games at JMU played.

But the 4 ESPN clowns never brought up that fact about IU, only went on and on about a weak schedule. You would think the B1G was ranked lower than the Mountain West listening to them. Galloway can go f*** himself but at least McFarland squeezed in "If IU loses a close game they are in the playoffs".... IMO IU wins this game.

The ESPN clowns will be speechless next week. I like what the UM AD said though ... "we watch games and what takes place on the field." ... but two of the ESPN clowns seem to want SOS to count more than what happens on the field !!!!

Screw 'em all and just win out. One game at a time, coaches and players that are use to winning .. and apparently have the ability to shut out all the noise. Even dumbass Galloway said IU had to keep their QB from getting hurt otherwise it is FSU all over again.
And here I thought there would be discussion of Ryan Day's situation. He's gotta be on a hot seat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iubhounds
And here I thought there would be discussion of Ryan Day's situation. He's gotta be on a hot seat.
I am retired and spend too much time on the internet about college football as well as all the analysis tv shows. It is surprising that hot seat topic is rarely brought up. IMO when IU wins, his days at OSU are numbered. It will also not surprise me of scUM upsets them the following week. Yet their players are probably not over confident like their fans.
 
He has always been anti-IU for years. He must know that if IU sits Rourke OSU has a much better chance of winning. He is a dumb announcer but at the same time, smart enough ex player to know what Rourke's IU offense can do to OSU ... he's scared about this Saturday. 😂
 
He has always been anti-IU for years. He must know that if IU sits Rourke OSU has a much better chance of winning. He is a dumb announcer but at the same time, smart enough ex player to know what Rourke's IU offense can do to OSU ... he's scared about this Saturday. 😂
I love this headline about Galloway's stupidity.

 
The dumbest thing about that show was Galloway saying we should rest our starting QB against the buckeyes. How can anyone take him seriously after that? The reactions are priceless.

I actually think that what he said made some sense if the only goal was to be in the CFP. Living in the real world, Cig and Roarke would never do this but it's not a completely ridiculous hypothetical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iubhounds
He has always been anti-IU for years. He must know that if IU sits Rourke OSU has a much better chance of winning. He is a dumb announcer but at the same time, smart enough ex player to know what Rourke's IU offense can do to OSU ... he's scared about this Saturday. 😂
Speaking about being scared, my nephew who is a big OSU fan from Cincy tells me a few of his friends are worried about Indiana winning. I assured him not to worry, Indiana will beatdown the Bucknuts, lol.
 
I actually think that what he said made some sense if the only goal was to be in the CFP.

ANNNDDD if we were guaranteed "in" the playoff, with likely a host option, even if we lost by 21 with Jackson at the helm.

Then...maybe, technically, it makes sense...kinda...if you're meek...and you win B10 titles all the time. 😁
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT