Oh Shocker Radical Left Winger BIden Gearing Up for 2025 bringing racism to everyone's door
- Thread starter mcmurtry66
- Start date
Exactly. In a perfect world, there would be no tariffs, but using them for leverage makes sense. Damn the ideology if it helps the country.
GWB was nominated because we Republicans nominated him. GWB was a very good speaker off script. He’s a far better speaker than Trump who speaks like a sixth grader trying to speak like he thinks someone smart would speak. It’s painful to listen to the idiot speak. Idiots think he sounds smart though. That explains your post.
No question ageing causes a deterioration in physical and mental ability. But the rate of decline is nowhere near the same. About 20% of those over 80 test cognitively the same as a 50 or 60 year- old.
Your dad is 82, huh. I’m one lap behind.
Actually, he’s 83. I’m terrible with birthdays and I forgot he just had one. 😏 My excuse is I don’t care about my birthday either.
No, it’s really not. All you ever do is talk about purging the party of Trump and Trumpism. You give no thought to what that would actually entail.
Trump speaks in images. Meaning, when he talks about anything, the listener will usually see an image of something. That’s usually pretty effective persuasion.
I have given a lot of thought to it. It needs to happen or the party will be irrelevant in a few years. It’s absolutely unsustainable.
It doesn’t work on me. Every test I’ve ever taken shows that I’m high on the logic and rationality scale and very low on the emotional scale. That emotional thing took my wife years to get past.
The same can be said of the old guard. People are done. Young people for sure don’t want to hear about wars etc. the future is far more populism and trump than bush McCain Cheney.
The idea that we traditional Republicans are for war is total nonsense. We’re for a strong military and strong allies and partners so we don’t have to go to war.
McCain wasn’t happy about the Iraq war yet the Trumpsters paint him with that brush. Romney too.
And yet the old guard paint “trumpsters.” I set forth above his positions on issues. That’s the reality. And there’s a reason no one wanted Haley and her political career is over. She’s a minority in the party. The old guard painting it anything else misses the mark.
Your casting everyone like coh and so many others who will vote for trump as trumpsters is no different than casting people who want Haley or Cheney or bush as war hawks.
So going forward that’s the verbiage I’ll use for you and “your party.” We are done with war hawks. Use the money for stuff other than paying for nato members because we are war hawks.
We need to get along. There was peace under trump. We need to preserve our party. We can’t give our party back to the war hawks
Or is that unfair….
The hard core MAGAs are isolationists and don’t agree with keeping our military edge on the rest of the world. These are nonstarters with me. It’s why I switched from Democrat to Republican 30+ years ago.
Also Haley is out and still getting hundreds of thousands of votes in the primaries. They’re unlikely to vote for Trump in the general.
I don’t think COH or you are Trumpsters. I get that non-Trumpster Republicans will vote for him. This one won’t.
I’m not a Warhawk. Supporting NATO is what those that aren’t Warhawks do.
Trumpsters are Americans who don’t like the old guard or the far left. Many are vets. Mas DANC. It’s disparaging. But as goat says you do you
Yes they are Americans. No question. Some of these Americans are pro-Russian more than pro-American. I have issues with that.
Not DANC. He’s hard core Trumpster to the point of repeating total lies in Trump’s defense, but he’s not pro-Russian.
I have yet to read or hear a MAGA supporter not agreeing with keeping our military edge.
I would think only the very far left think that.
You're exaggerating. No one in the MAGA camp is more pro-Russian than pro-American. Come on, Aloha. You can be pro-American but think, for example, American policy towards Ukraine was antagonistic towards Russia and didn't take Russia's history and defense interests adequately into account.
Start looking and pay attention because they’re bitching about military spending as well as our alliances.
We have MAGA posters here that post straight up Russian propaganda.
Biden's crackdown on taxes benefiting 'white' people slammed
The administration released its 2025 budget proposal, which calls for a significant increase to the top capital gains tax rate.www.newsweek.com
What’s next? Work?
Referring to the Super rich as being in a separate race makes about as much sense as lumping folks into a race according to their skin color.
To make up for any past and present prejudices which may have caused economic disadvantages to people of color we could lower their tax rates to conform to a color chart instead of reparations.
Marrying a really dark man of wealth would be a wise choice for a pale female. Within a 100 years the black race will have disappeared thanks to Inter marriages.
If we close bases overseas or stop spending money defending other nations, we don't need to spend as much. Isolationist policies would save money under that theory. But no one says we should try to cede our technological advantages that I've seen. Happy to read whatever you post, though.
That doesn't mean they are more pro-Russian than pro-American.
Our bases over seas reduce the chances of war. War increases our spending way beyond our peacetime spending.
Don’t agree. We have two posters that are far more pro-Russian than pro-American. I find it very sad.
I understand your side of the argument, Aloha. You might be right. You might be wrong. The point is that the US can keep its edge in technological and military superiority over the rest of the globe without overseas bases.
Also, your phraseology is probably a fundamental point of contention. You say reduce "the chances of war." But many on the opposite side would claim it is not the US's burden to "reduce the chances of war" except when it comes to our nation.
The difficult question here is probably this: should we keep our bases overseas if it means decreasing the chance of war among all nations, but increasing the chance the US will be violently attacked there? Is it worth it?
What do you mean by that? That they are more critical of the U.S. than Russia? That they think Russia is a better nation than the U.S.? That they would actually side with Russia over the U.S. if the two went to war?
They’re critical and have earned that right. Mas is a Vietnam vet. Sarge. And DANC. Paratrooper. But guess what. Spy. Russian language speaking spy. So yes. He too has earned that right
That's not true Aloha. Trump signed off on the Space Force which was a big deal IMO. You don't think so?
Trump Signs Law Establishing U.S. Space Force
President Donald J. Trump signed into law legislation creating the first new armed service since 1947 — the U.S. Space Force.
www.defense.gov
Just for everyone following along at home.
Russian propaganda = Hard truths about U.S. foreign interventions that make Aloha mad and he can’t form cogent rebuttals to.
The hard truth is that unless we want to completely nationalize our weapons industry, our defense industrial base kind of needs to keep supplying arms to new conflicts to stay afloat. Not much money for R&D without it.
They currently make their money by
A. Various military assistance packages and defense treaties entered into by the U.S. that require the other participant(s) purchase our weaponry
Or
B. Supplying arms to an ongoing conflict
They can’t thrive on A alone. It’s really hard to maintain an elastic, innovative defense industrial base without continuous war.
We were isolationists before WWI and WWII. Did that stance reduce our cost in blood and treasure or increase it? I think it's clear it increased the cost in both. I see the same situation now if we become isolationists again.
Last edited:
The answer to all three of those questions seems to be yes based on their posting history.
Fo shoooo! The only “conservative “ thing he did was pump up the pride and confidence of the lower and middle classes. Pumped up freedoms of self responsibility and removed the barriers to entry that the dems intentionally put in place, so they have a slave mentality voter base.
He spent like a heroine addicted navy boat driver! …. We gotta fix that last part, but he’s no “total” conservative. That may come from the fact his #1 rule in life is, in negotiation (art of the deal) is that everyone has to walk away with a win of some kind.
The swamp , which includes all the msdnc media, burry this… because they need the Auschwitz mentality dem voter to stay in striped cloths and vote them in power!
Actually, I'm not sure that was necessary. We already had a US Space Command, and I don't think it was necessary to create a Space Force. I also think separating the US Army Air Corps from the Army and making it the Air Force was a mistake. The most integrated Land, Air and Sea forces are the US Navy and Marine Corps. That's the right model.That's not true Aloha. Trump signed off on the Space Force which was a big deal IMO. You don't think so?
Trump Signs Law Establishing U.S. Space Force
President Donald J. Trump signed into law legislation creating the first new armed service since 1947 — the U.S. Space Force.www.defense.gov
