ADVERTISEMENT

ND in B1G?

vesuvius13

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
May 11, 2017
13,844
39,354
113
ND and Oregon in the B1G. This rumor is gaining more ground and IU would really need to step up to the plate for football even if it means rising above basketball.

What do you think the chances are these two come to the B1G soon.
 
ND is a total question mark, I have no idea how much money they are willing to eat to remain independent, but with the payout they would receive in the new B1G, it's going do be somewhere in the neighborhood of $70-80 million dollars...Annually. No normal university would pass up on that money, but they are already eating at least 30 million dollars a year rn by being independent/ACC, so clearly for better or worse they do not act like a normal University. Some ND fans want to continue to cry about Michigan trying to kill ND's FB program over 100 years ago, and say because of that, ND will NEVER join the B1G. Well if the last 13 months have shown us one thing, it's that CFB programs are more than happy to take a wrecking ball to history if it means a bigger payday. If I were a betting man, I'd say odds are as high now as they've ever been for ND to join the B1G, but until I see anything official, I wouldn't hold my breath on the matter.

What I will say is that ND would be IDIOTIC to join any conference other than the B1G. If we are working with the premise that they have to join one conference, even though they're associated with the ACC their current schedule only has 3 teams that are on it every year and none are in the ACC; The three teams are USC, Stanford and Navy. They certainly aren't joining Navy in the AAC and they're not joining the new Pac-12, that just leaves the B1G. They would be able to retain the USC rivalry as one of their required conference games. If they really wanted to keep Stanford and Navy on the schedule, they could do that and give themselves one more flex game. They wouldn't get that flexibility in either the ACC or SEC because USC would be an OOC game(working with the premise that both conferences will be at 9 required conference games by the time ND actually joins).

Oregon is simple, does the B1G want them, they clearly want out of the Pac-12, and have been a good enough program in FB over the last two decades to join, but w/o Phil Knight, the TV market Oregon brings in wouldn't even make it past the doors of the B1G office. I linked an article below that said according to a former Executive at Fox Sports, Oregon and Washington do not add enough value to make up the 141 million they'd be owed as full members of the B1G(the estimate cited in the article was $60 million), so the B1G may have to work something out where they don't get a full payout initially, or just turn them down altogether.

 
Last edited:
ND and Oregon in the B1G. This rumor is gaining more ground and IU would really need to step up to the plate for football even if it means rising above basketball.

What do you think the chances are these two come to the B1G soon.
It all depends on whether ND has a better path to the National Championship as an independent or as a B1G conference member.

Currently, they almost always likely get one of the 4 spots, so long as they finish 12-0, 11-1. So any alignment that forces them to play too many contenders would probably get a "NO".

Now, if the the B1G and SEC complete their superconference expansions, then they decide they will hold their own CFB playoff for a NC, members only, then ND's hands would likely be forced for fear of missing out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
Latest on Pac10 Twitter is that there are going to major talks this week with the Big12.

 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ND has to make a move or they’re going to be on the outside looking in in a bad way. In years past, their independent schedule including PU, MSU, Mich, Navy, BC, Stanford, and USC rivalry games could be a top tier schedule that would overcome independent status.

With conference consolidation and hrs likely to be the death of ACC football soon, they need to get into a stable situation.
 
ND won’t join any conference in football. Regardless of their schedule, with a 0, 1, or sometimes even 2 loss record they will always get a playoff spot. They are a national draw and don’t need a conference affiliation. It’s NOTRE DAME ffs.
 
ND won't have many options soon as they will squeezed out soon if they don't join the B1G. Even ND looks to their own self-interest and will join sooner rather than later.

My concern isn't ND but will IU step up to make IUFB relevant or continue with their provincial ways.
 
If the reports of Colorado,Utah and the Arizona schools jumping to the B12 actually happens I look for Oregon and Washington to hop on board the B10 train.
If those four do indeed switch to the B12 the PAC 12 is done.
 
Most ND fans would rather eat dirt than join the B10.

fans have nothing to do with this.

i'm not even sure who at the schools do for B10 schools, with ND being the exception with the school still controlling it's own fate.

who at IU or Iowa or PU gave the ok for adding USC and UCLA?

or has Warren been given carte blanche?

that said, an interesting false narrative has been circulating imo.

what will we do? we're all doomed if we aren't in the SEC or B10.

even if the current remains of the PAC held tight and took a lesser tv deal next go round, same with the remains of the B12, same with ND whom ever they went with, or just went back independent, they still all will have more money than they know what to do with.

B10 schools have all already built Taj Mahals for every sport, so what's next, a $20 mil tiddly winks complex with Italian Marble locker rooms?

and where would IU put one anyway. there isn't unlimited land available at any school.

on top of that, imo the facilities war is over.

the war only happened in the first place because schools couldn't pay players.

now they can or will, directly or indirectly.

so does the extra go into player's pockets? how does a major university benefit from that scenario?

$20 mil a yr for the fball and bball coach? $5 mil yr for the AD?

who at any school benefits from that other than a hand full of the already filthy rich.


ND will have more money than they know what to do with regardless.

remaining PAC and even B12 schools will have more than they'll ever need to operate their programs, even if not as much as they'd like, regardless of what happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ND won’t join any conference in football. Regardless of their schedule, with a 0, 1, or sometimes even 2 loss record they will always get a playoff spot. They are a national draw and don’t need a conference affiliation. It’s NOTRE DAME ffs.
I don't think you're getting it. The B1G and SEC are going to have a playoff of just their conference teams. The rest of the conferences will amount to FCS. Notre Dame either joins the B1G or SEC conference or be left out of everything. I think the delay is due to mapping out details. Schedule preferences, ACC buyout clause, remaining Financials. In 2 years, they're going, B1G or SEC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
Let them eat dirt... 😉

Is it too late to copyright that... 😎

- I'm sort of hoping they keeping doing them and stay independent... -
If so, they'll not be included in the CFP in a few years. If ND wants to truly go into irrelevance, they'd stay independent. It worked for them in the past but they no longer really have a choice
 
If so, they'll not be included in the CFP in a few years. If ND wants to truly go into irrelevance, they'd stay independent. It worked for them in the past but they no longer really have a choice

of course they do.

and playoffs will go to 8, then 16.

only reason they haven't already, is the B10 and SEC waiting out consolidation, to bargain from a stronger more monopoly entity position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
of course they do.

and playoffs will go to 8, then 16.

only reason they haven't already, is the B10 and SEC waiting out consolidation, to bargain from a stronger more monopoly entity position.
They already know consolidation is coming. They can decline and become an FCS team, or stay with the big boys by joining the SEC or B1G. Doesn't seem like much of a choice to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
They already know consolidation is coming. They can decline and become an FCS team, or stay with the big boys by joining the SEC or B1G. Doesn't seem like much of a choice to me.

they can go full independent again, and still play a major power school every week.

if the major conferences try and blacklist them, Amy Coney Barrett and friends will weigh in.

that's the last thing conferences wanting to monopolize want to deal with.
 
they can go full independent again, and still play a major power school every week.

if the major conferences try and blacklist them, Amy Coney Barrett and friends will weigh in.

that's the last thing conferences wanting to monopolize want to deal with.
Haha The Supreme Court will tell colleges who they must play in college sports? Now that's comical. The B1G and SEC will be seceding from the NCAA and ND has absolutely no say in what those conferences do. I think you're struggling to understand what's happening here.
 
sounds like Oregon (Phil Knight notwithstanding) and Washington don't generate enough revenue to be accepted into the conference unless it's via an arrangement that's the inverse of what UTx and Okla have had in the evaporating Big 12--those 2 schools get a bigger slice of the shared revenue pie than the other Big 12 teams, and Oregon and Washington might only be admitted into the B1G 10 with the understanding that, at least temporarily, they would get a smaller slice of the shared revenue pie than the other (for now 16) schools

I suspect for most of the ADs in the B1G conference the optimal outcome would be Stanford (in a bigger TV market than either UO or UW) joining, which might help ND to commit, followed the a negotiated settlement among ACC schools that would allow UNC and UVA to leave and become the 19th and 20th teams in the B1G 10.

Dunno, I would've thought those 2 schools' (UO and UW) football programs would generate more than enough revenue, but I don't know how the numbers are being calculated. This story is apparently on Twitter but I don't have a Twitter account. Apparently the source was some "official" who described the 2 programs as "tweeners" but I would think that might have more to do with the poor TV contract the Pac-12 has than with the 2 schools specifically.
 
Last edited:
What must be remembered is that any school (other than ND) can be made to crawl by the Big Ten.

Oregon’s Chinese-forced-labor-camp-funded AD doesn’t want to take a smaller cut? Continue enjoying those epic showdowns with Berkeley at 1 A.M.

Yeah, we’re the drivers here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
What must be remembered is that any school (other than ND) can be made to crawl by the Big Ten.

Oregon’s Chinese-forced-labor-camp-funded AD doesn’t want to take a smaller cut? Enjoy those epic showdowns with Berkeley at 1 A.M.

Yeah, we’re the drivers here.
Cal has been conspicuously silent through all of this.

For the record, I wouldn't be all that upset if they invited Utah and Colorado--at least that would get the B1G into Denver and Salt Lake City.

But I suppose those 2 schools would probably have the same "revenue problem" (whatever that actually is) that UO and UW allegedly have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
Cal has been conspicuously silent through all of this.

For the record, I wouldn't be all that upset if they invited Utah and Colorado--at least that would get the B1G into Denver and Salt Lake City.

But I suppose those 2 schools would probably have the same "revenue problem" (whatever that actually is) that UO and UW allegedly have.
Apparently nobody at all in television land gives a rip about Cal, and from reading PAC boards, Cal doesn’t either.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
fans have nothing to do with this.

i'm not even sure who at the schools do for B10 schools, with ND being the exception with the school still controlling it's own fate.

who at IU or Iowa or PU gave the ok for adding USC and UCLA?

or has Warren been given carte blanche?

that said, an interesting false narrative has been circulating imo.

what will we do? we're all doomed if we aren't in the SEC or B10.

even if the current remains of the PAC held tight and took a lesser tv deal next go round, same with the remains of the B12, same with ND whom ever they went with, or just went back independent, they still all will have more money than they know what to do with.

B10 schools have all already built Taj Mahals for every sport, so what's next, a $20 mil tiddly winks complex with Italian Marble locker rooms?

and where would IU put one anyway. there isn't unlimited land available at any school.

on top of that, imo the facilities war is over.

the war only happened in the first place because schools couldn't pay players.

now they can or will, directly or indirectly.

so does the extra go into player's pockets? how does a major university benefit from that scenario?

$20 mil a yr for the fball and bball coach? $5 mil yr for the AD?

who at any school benefits from that other than a hand full of the already filthy rich.


ND will have more money than they know what to do with regardless.

remaining PAC and even B12 schools will have more than they'll ever need to operate their programs, even if not as much as they'd like, regardless of what happens.
Lots of valid points but, there is something thats likely toncontinue to drive this insane facilitie$ war and it’s EGO. Players want the shiniest and biggest and schools and especially alumni want the bragging rights. We have seen the enemy and it is us.
 
Good piece (link below) in today's WSJ. A couple of key takeaways:
  • ND's contract with NBC, worth "just" $15 million per year, runs through the 2025 season. With rival USC joining the B1G, and given the B1G's increasingly huge payouts to member schools, I think it's only a matter of time until ND is in.
  • There's not a chance ND joins the ACC in football. The ACC is locked into a shitty contract with ESPN until 2036. Also, ND's other sports (non-football) disbursements from the ACC are paltry compared to what they'd get in the B1G.
  • According to a WSJ source, ten unnamed schools have informally reached out to Kevin Warren since last Thursday, presumably to express interest in joining the conference. Further expansion seems likely.
The Big Ten is a sizzling hot commodity.

 
  • Like
Reactions: IU73 and vesuvius13
Article/report referenced in this comes from the WSJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
I don't think you're getting it. The B1G and SEC are going to have a playoff of just their conference teams. The rest of the conferences will amount to FCS. Notre Dame either joins the B1G or SEC conference or be left out of everything. I think the delay is due to mapping out details. Schedule preferences, ACC buyout clause, remaining Financials. In 2 years, they're going, B1G or SEC.
Estimates are that ND will have to put down $150-175M to get out of the ACC, because of the GOR on the minor sports + the contract clause saying they can't take their football to another conference.

They don't belong in the SEC, and they hate the Big 10. I think they will do everything they can to get out of coming to the BT, including looking at jumping to the SEC with UNC, Duke, GT, VA, Clemson, FSU, and NC State. (My understanding is that it takes 8 ACC teams to fold up that GORs). I think your 2 year time frame for something big to happen with ND is about right.....just think the Irish might still have a surprise in store for the BT.
 
Article/report referenced in this comes from the WSJ.
7/10 are pretty obvious:

--Washington
--Oregon
--Arizona
--ASU
--Kansas
--Colorado
--Utah

Other possibilities: Stanford; Cal; WSU; OSU; Kansas St; Pitt; Syracuse; BYU; Iowa St; UNC, VA, VA Tech; GT; Clemson; FSU
 
Cal has been conspicuously silent through all of this.

For the record, I wouldn't be all that upset if they invited Utah and Colorado--at least that would get the B1G into Denver and Salt Lake City.

But I suppose those 2 schools would probably have the same "revenue problem" (whatever that actually is) that UO and UW allegedly have.

Big 12 is apparently all over Washington & Oregon. Hope they don't get them and eventually the Big 10 ends up with Stanford & Cal.

If the Big 12 gets Washington & Oregon, they have a weirdly strong 19 team league:

--UW
--Oregon
--Utah
--Az
--ASU
--Colorado
--Utah
--Kansas
--Baylor
--Iowa St.
--KS State
--OK St.
--TCU
--TTU
--WVU
--BYU
--UCF
--UC
--Houston
 
Apparently nobody at all in television land gives a rip about Cal, and from reading PAC boards, Cal doesn’t either.
they may not but I suspect B1G presidents/chancellors do--they'd love to get Stanford and Cal into the B1G 10, regardless of the current state of Cal's athletics

and UNC and UVA once the lawyers get the ACC contractual agreement voided for "excessive length" of its performance
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU73 and vesuvius13
they may not but I suspect B1G presidents/chancellors do--they'd love to get Stanford and Cal into the B1G 10, regardless of the current state of Cal's athletics

and UNC and UVA once the lawyers get the ACC contractual agreement voided for "excessive length" of its performance
I hope you’re right about that first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ND is a total question mark, I have no idea how much money they are willing to eat to remain independent, but with the payout they would receive in the new B1G, it's going do be somewhere in the neighborhood of $70-80 million dollars...Annually. No normal university would pass up on that money, but they are already eating at least 30 million dollars a year rn by being independent/ACC, so clearly for better or worse they do not act like a normal University. Some ND fans want to continue to cry about Michigan trying to kill ND's FB program over 100 years ago, and say because of that, ND will NEVER join the B1G. Well if the last 13 months have shown us one thing, it's that CFB programs are more than happy to take a wrecking ball to history if it means a bigger payday. If I were a betting man, I'd say odds are as high now as they've ever been for ND to join the B1G, but until I see anything official, I wouldn't hold my breath on the matter.

What I will say is that ND would be IDIOTIC to join any conference other than the B1G. If we are working with the premise that they have to join one conference, even though they're associated with the ACC their current schedule only has 3 teams that are on it every year and none are in the ACC; The three teams are USC, Stanford and Navy. They certainly aren't joining Navy in the AAC and they're not joining the new Pac-12, that just leaves the B1G. They would be able to retain the USC rivalry as one of their required conference games. If they really wanted to keep Stanford and Navy on the schedule, they could do that and give themselves one more flex game. They wouldn't get that flexibility in either the ACC or SEC because USC would be an OOC game(working with the premise that both conferences will be at 9 required conference games by the time ND actually joins).

Oregon is simple, does the B1G want them, they clearly want out of the Pac-12, and have been a good enough program in FB over the last two decades to join, but w/o Phil Knight, the TV market Oregon brings in wouldn't even make it past the doors of the B1G office. I linked an article below that said according to a former Executive at Fox Sports, Oregon and Washington do not add enough value to make up the 141 million they'd be owed as full members of the B1G(the estimate cited in the article was $60 million), so the B1G may have to work something out where they don't get a full payout initially, or just turn them down altogether.

Well, the geography tells us ND should be Big Ten (Big 20?). I am sure this will carry more weight than money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
Well, the geography tells us ND should be Big Ten (Big 20?). I am sure this will carry more weight than money.
FWIW, the distances from Nebraska to USC/UCLA and from Boston College to Miami are nearly identical.

And it's a three-hour plane ride from Lincoln to Los Angeles but it's also about a two-and-a-half hour plane ride from Austin to Columbia, SC--and you lose an hour changing time zones.

I think scheduling will prove to be more of an issue than travel, at least for football. Minor sports may well be a different situation, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT