More winning
- Thread starter twenty02
- Start date
Tariffs will negatively impact the top 5 - 10% more than the average American.
Crazy and hateful, and not sexy enough to offset it. Decent body with a face to protect it.
Never heard that last phrase. Good one. Going to have to work it into a song.
I don't think it matters what her face looks like.
"Beauty’s only skin-deep, but ugliness goes to the bone."
Trump administration 'looking at' suspending habeas corpus for migrants, Stephen Miller says
Multiple court cases challenging the Trump administrations effort to deport undocumented immigrants from the U.S. are based on habeas claims.
The other half of this.
Trump administration 'looking at' suspending habeas corpus for migrants, Stephen Miller says
Multiple court cases challenging the Trump administrations effort to deport undocumented immigrants from the U.S. are based on habeas claims.www.cnbc.com
The other half of this.
Trump needs to stop listening to this guy. He's driving him off a cliff.
Miller personifies the cold heart and cruelty that is the basis for Trump's policies.
She's all yours.
She possesses certain characteristics you obviously find desirable in another person...like an Adam's Apple.
Nothing has been finalized. Why are they announcing deals when a final deal hasn't been agreed to?
You have some really dumb takes on just about everything, which solidifies your spot as number two on the WC Dumb Poster list right behind dbm. No one will be sad if an actual good trade deal is achieved. No one.
I’m more concerned about bad trade deals being struck…and called good trade deals.
This UK “deal” is a good example. It leaves in place a 10% baseline tariff on the vast majority of British imports. It only lowers rates on a small handful of goods. It’s not even effective as a starting point. And Trumpers are running around like it’s some big victory.
That’s entirely what I’m expecting to happen here. The Trump admin seems almost desperate for positive headlines in their trade gambit. Whatever it is we announce, it seems likely that it won’t be much at face value…and will probably be refuted publicly by the Chinese, to boot.
Speaking selfishly the money means very little to me and my business. Now having a supply chain cluster fck the gov never accounted for in collecting tariffs is what scares me
Speaking of winning, mostly losing, this is a good summary of how he’s doing in the courts:
apple.news
Trump’s Legal Battles: Tracking Hundreds of US Court Cases — Bloomberg
From immigration to cuts in federal employees and funding, Trump’s expansive executive policies are testing the US legal system’s role in America’s balance of power.
China says there was no deal.
Lol.... Didn't he try this in 2020 only to get shot down? Why they think they'll have any more success this time?
It’s a lack of understanding how our system works. But more likely he’s just blowing smoke
He keeps saying he’s made deals. And then the other country says no, they haven’t. But people like you of course, believe him.
Do you mean in the sense that he’s attempting to implement pharmaceutical price controls by EO or that he’s attempting to do it at all?
This would never pass Congress - and thank God for that. And I say that not because I’m a big fan of the notoriously influential Pharmaceutical lobby. But because it would appear that some people who matter have a modicum of economic sense about them.
And I can’t see how this stays in place. I’m not even sure Trump cares if it does or not. If anything, he may be counting on it being struck down in the courts.
But it’s a good opportunity to educate people on why the government never does anything about drug prices…despite lots of politicians expressing outrage about them.
Drug prices are a huge problem. But the biggest reason they are is because we subsidize price-controlled monopsonies around the globe.
No importing from China the Enemy.
Genuine products *Made in the 🎶God Bless the USA 🎶 *.
Between trade and now pharma... Trump is really letting his far-left freak flag fly.
Has he even tried to issue any kind of substantive EO? As far as I can tell, the extent of executive action so far is a social media post that says "Prices down! Grrrrrr!!!!!!"
I will be interested to learn where the WH thinks he derives the power to do something like this.
If his end goal here is to get other countries to boost their controlled prices and shoulder more of the burden such that our prices would come down, then that’s a worthy goal. But this approach to doing that is legally dubious (at best) and strategically inchoate.
