Marquette throttled Purdue

[UTFO]

With a roster constructed almost entirely from the transfer portal.

better get used to and over all the portal, nil stuff

look at our football program.

 

[BoilerN]

I’m not sure this years version of Bama is as good as Oats has had recently. Likely overrated.
We get another look at them tonight vs the Illini.
A chance for the B10 to extend its dominance over the SEC.

Did not expect them to beat Illinois by 13 with 0 production from Sears. Figured they went as he went.

 

[kkott]

He just looks like a freshman. He will be fine. To me it looks like he is maybe pressing just a tick.

I'm sure he will be. My point was, a freshman as an impact defensive player, especially on the perimeter is, highly unlikely and uncommon. The UConn kid last year (Castle?) was one of the few exceptions. Talking about one that hasn't played a minute of college ball as one of the best defenders in the conference, was just ridiculous.

 

[Hoosier Clarion]

Pretty much the blueprint on how to beat Purdue. Assuming Woody won't adjust the line-up or the rotations we're better at almost every position accept point and Rice isn't far behind Smith IMHO. We have line-ups that can be really good at guarding the perimeter we just don't see them often enough.

Rice is at least as good as the Dribbler.

 

[T.M.P.]

Rice is at least as good as the Dribbler.

Naw .... Rice is pretty damn good and probably much better defensively but offensively, Smith has the whole PG kit bag, handle, shot, vision, IQ and court sense. His IQ and feel for the game sets him apart.

Combine that with the short legs and lower torso of a 5'5 player that allows him to navigate very small spaces and turn on a dime, and the upper torso/strength of a 6'5 player with knuckle dragging long arms that ensures the ball always stays low .. and he's a far tougher player to check currently.

Edge goes to the Leprechaun.

 

[T.M.P.]

I’m not sure this years version of Bama is as good as Oats has had recently. Likely overrated.

It's one of his most talented/deepest rosters. 2 deep at every position and currently his starting 2 is out with injury probably until January.

This early in the season there's very few teams that are as proficient or efficient as they will become in February. Teams with returning cores, and experience have the edge. Teams that recruit smarter less talented players - high floor/low ceiling - also have an edge as they tend to reach peak earlier. ie Purdue's countless December championships and March failures. Some of the low floor/high ceiling teams eventually catch up.

November assessments are fool's gold.

 

[steelyvan]

It's one of his most talented/deepest rosters. 2 deep at every position and currently his starting 2 is out with injury probably until January.

This early in the season there's very few teams that are as proficient or efficient as they will become in February. Teams with returning cores, and experience have the edge. Teams that recruit smarter less talented players - high floor/low ceiling - also have an edge as they tend to reach peak earlier. ie Purdue's countless December championships and March failures. Some of the low floor/high ceiling teams eventually catch up.

November assessments are fool's gold.

Apparently so. They looked so much better on offense last night than previous games. Still a little soft on defense.
Relatively easy win vs good competition while Spears does not score?!

 

[T.M.P.]

Spears does not score?!

and was benched.. He benched a preseason 1st team All-American put up a 100 and won by double figures... I tuned in later and thought he was injured or had foul trouble ..

fwiw - Holloway would probably start for 99% of teams in the NCAA. They're probably as deep as @Lucy.

 

[Thcgh]

Pretty much the blueprint on how to beat Purdue. Assuming Woody won't adjust the line-up or the rotations we're better at almost every position accept point and Rice isn't far behind Smith IMHO. We have line-ups that can be really good at guarding the perimeter we just don't see them often enough.

Smith sucks.

 

[Thcgh]

Naw .... Rice is pretty damn good and probably much better defensively but offensively, Smith has the whole PG kit bag, handle, shot, vision, IQ and court sense. His IQ and feel for the game sets him apart.

Combine that with the short legs and lower torso of a 5'5 player that allows him to navigate very small spaces and turn on a dime, and the upper torso/strength of a 6'5 player with knuckle dragging long arms that ensures the ball always stays low .. and he's a far tougher player to check currently.

Edge goes to the Leprechaun.

Smith sucks. You should be embarrassed by your assessment

 

[T.M.P.]

Smith sucks. You should be embarrassed by your assessment

Okay, I'll try .... *trying really hard*

Sorry, didn't work.

 

[HoosierJimbo89]

Naw .... Rice is pretty damn good and probably much better defensively but offensively, Smith has the whole PG kit bag, handle, shot, vision, IQ and court sense. His IQ and feel for the game sets him apart.

Combine that with the short legs and lower torso of a 5'5 player that allows him to navigate very small spaces and turn on a dime, and the upper torso/strength of a 6'5 player with knuckle dragging long arms that ensures the ball always stays low .. and he's a far tougher player to check currently.

Edge goes to the Leprechaun.

Smith still has the white man's disease and is short.

 

[Thcgh]

Okay, I'll try .... *trying really hard*

Sorry, didn't work.

Not surprised

 

[hickorytree1]

Smith still has the white man's disease and is short.

He's damn good.

 

[HoosierJimbo89]

He's damn good.

Should have went pro.

 

[ulrey]

He's damn good.

Reminds me of Damon Bailey somewhat..

 

[SaratogaBoiler1]

Small lineup is the key for Purdue - who they started today is what will either work or will fail going forward - TKR, Heide, Colvin, Smith and Loyer. Son is home and we are watching football game - not great but they should still make the playoff.

 

[Blimpy]

They're still solid. And they'll still beat a fair amount of good teams. As we already saw against Bama. But to your point, Bama didn't read the book evidently? Or they chose not to put much pressure on PUs, guards, for whatever reason. I think IU has looked about as good as anyone against the Smith led teams the last couple years (outside UConn obviously). And that's because we've had fairly physical guards that did pressure the ball fairly well. We swept them 2 years ago, and last year we were competitive for longer stretches, Edey was just too much to handle.

Did not Smith have like 6 layups against IU at Mackey last year? IU must of have left the BOOK at home last year! Having UCONN and IU in the same sentence gives very little respect to the game of basketball! I don't think IU was "competitive" at all with Purdue!

 

[T.M.P.]

Did not Smith have like 6 layups against IU at Mackey last year? IU must of have left the BOOK at home last year! Having UCONN and IU in the same sentence gives very little respect to the game of basketball! I don't think IU was "competitive" at all with Purdue!

42