Shit. I wish I could remember. We will know soon. I think it might’ve been Friday. I was a bit tipsy both days. No food and a few strong IPAs.pretty sure I watched that. with KEllog?
Shit. I wish I could remember. We will know soon. I think it might’ve been Friday. I was a bit tipsy both days. No food and a few strong IPAs.pretty sure I watched that. with KEllog?
It would be criminal for VT not to have a better seed than us after winning the ACC tourney like that.No chance VT gets a better seed than us. The ACC is straight trash, the computer knows it. I’ll be shocked if any of them make the second weekend. The big ten is gonna do well this year. Might even be there year.
It’s criminal they still let your breath in this forum.It would be criminal for VT not to have a better seed than us after winning the ACC tourney like that.
That’s not true at all. It’s completely asinine. They value the conference tournaments the most as they should. Neutral court games end of year are far more important than November. Cmon man.NC state!!! The committee said they weigh every game no matter November or March.
Still salty over IU's resurfacing?It would be criminal for VT not to have a better seed than us after winning the ACC tourney like that.
You are right. A team like LSU or St. Mary's and then a team like an Illinois or Purdue would be cool.If we are an 11 seed, we will play a 6 seed in the first game and then 3 if we win. I actually think this is a good position for us. Additionally, I think one of the things that hurt us this year is that we did not play “big ten “ wrestleball. I almost think different officiating may benefit teams like us and Illinois and will hurt Wisconsin and MSU.
Outside of the Ws and Ls in the ledger, tournaments don't weigh more than the overall season.No chance VT gets a better seed than us. The ACC is straight trash, the computer knows it. I’ll be shocked if any of them make the second weekend. The big ten is gonna do well this year. Might even be there year.
Dude, they value the winner because it’s an automatic bid. They literally say the tourneys as a whole have way less influence. It’s the whole body of work. What a moron you are.That’s not true at all. It’s completely asinine. They value the conference tournaments the most as they should. Neutral court games end of year are far more important than November. Cmon man.
What aren't you over on Gold&Black?That’s not true at all. It’s completely asinine. They value the conference tournaments the most as they should. Neutral court games end of year are far more important than November. Cmon man.
Because he makes them all look dumb. If that’s possible.What aren't you over on Gold&Black?
Dude, they value the winner because it’s an automatic bid. They literally say the tourneys as a whole have way less influence. It’s the whole body of work. What a moron you are.
They said during the VT game that is was true for the Power 5 tournament champs. To be fair I took their word and didn’t research.I don’t think that’s the case because 16 seed AQ teams are in play in games
It’s criminal they still let your breath in this forum.
VT cannot be in the play in games. AQ’s are guaranteed to not have to play the play ins.
Only the 16 seeds as AQs are subject to the play-in games. Two of them will get advanced to the field automatically, the other four play it off. VT won't be a 16, so they'll automatically advance to the field.I don’t think that’s the case because 16 seed AQ teams are in play in games
TN beat KY yesterday and TN beat A&M today. You have been brainwashed by the KY happy media.Hope you’re right.
Va Tech likely jumped us last night.
Texas A&M might already have. But for sure will if they beat Kentucky today.
Davidson game shouldn’t matter I wouldn’t think. Unless IU is one of the last 1 or 2 teams in. Which I can’t imagine is true.
I hope they don't drop us in a play-in game but I wouldn't put it past them if they are trying to make a splash.