ADVERTISEMENT

Let the chaos begin!

Fed employment probationary is 1-3 years.

Flip side is what they are attempting is pretty blatantly illegal. Probationary employees can be fired for cause quite easily ....but on an individual basis, for poor performance, etc....Doing blanket layoffs of every probationary employee is most certainly a violation of the law. But we know that laws are now only suggestions for this regime.
So once they get through the probationary period they can just prop their feet up, watch Netflix on their phones all day do no work, and never get fired?

That’s a hell of a gig if true.
 
So once they get through the probationary period they can just prop their feet up, watch Netflix on their phones all day do no work, and never get fired?

That’s a hell of a gig if true.
Of course not and he didn’t say anything like that. They can be fired immediately for misconduct like that. They can be fired for poor performance too. It’s a total myth they can’t be fired.
 
Of course not and he didn’t say anything like that. They can be fired immediately for misconduct like that. They can be fired for poor performance too. It’s a total myth they can’t be fired.
Yet a far cry from at will. Which applies to most of America. You come work for me. You don’t get probation. Notice. Nothing. If tomorrow I decide I’d rather buy a car than payroll you’re out. And that’s how most of the country lives
 
Of course not and he didn’t say anything like that. They can be fired immediately for misconduct like that. They can be fired for poor performance too. It’s a total myth they can’t be fired.
My parents were both public school teachers for almost 80 years combined. Not one has ever heard of a single teacher ever being fired for poor performance. I assume it’s the same in federal government.
 
Yet a far cry from at will. Which applies to most of America. You come work for me. You don’t get probation. Notice. Nothing. If tomorrow I decide I’d rather buy a car than payroll you’re out. And that’s how most of the country lives
Probation means they can be let go at any point during that period. They can be fired almost immediately for misconduct. They can be fired for poor performance, but the government has built in a process that allows them a chance to improve. If they don't, they're gone too. That's different than the private sector but Congress wanted those workforce protections in the law. If a union is involved there are some additional constraints like in the private sector. I don't think unions should be permitted in the public sector. The government isn't exactly like the non-union private sector, but it's a total myth that government employees can't be fired.
 
My parents were both public school teachers for almost 80 years combined. Not one has ever heard of a single teacher ever being fired for poor performance. I assume it’s the same in federal government.
Wrong. When I was active duty and had civilians working for me, I fired two for poor performance. My guess is that most teachers are wimps when it comes to that sort of thing.
 
Probation means they can be let go at any point during that period. They can be fired almost immediately for misconduct. They can be fired for poor performance, but the government has built in a process that allows them a chance to improve. If they don't, they're gone too. That's different than the private sector but Congress wanted those workforce protections in the law. If a union is involved there are some additional constraints like in the private sector. I don't think unions should be permitted in the public sector. The government isn't exactly like the non-union private sector, but it's a total myth that government employees can't be fired.
trust me I know all about it. As I said gov ees have protections, in law, and in practice, that non K at will private sector ees can only dream about. The only disadvantage is federal workers comp is dog shit. But gov ees are wayyyyyyyyyyy more protected than the vast majority of Americans. It’s another huge benefit they enjoy
 
JD Vance is taking a lot of heat for his speech in Munich. The speech itself was fantastic. There's nothing he said in this speech that I disagree with.

His major theme is that if you embrace democracy, you have to embrace ideas and votes for things you don't like. And he excoriates (but doesn't name) Thierry Breton for having cheered the annulment of a Romanian election under EU pressure...and for musing about the possibility of doing the same thing in Germany (if the AfD were to prevail).

But, of course, the obvious rejoinder to this would be that Vance's own boss, uh, quite famously objected to, dismissed as rigged, and sought to have overturned an election he didn't like. And I think that's 100% fair to be throwing that back in Vance's face. In other words, Vance doesn't occupy the moral space to be the one to be saying this. It's really something that ought to be coming from somebody like Kamala Harris or Joe Biden.

But would they ever give this speech to Europe? Given John Kerry's odious remarks about social media not long ago, I seriously doubt that they would. I fear that Biden or Harris might be just fine with the idea that a Romanian election should be annulled if it didn't turn out the way they wanted (they claimed Russian interference, natch). Because the entire enterprise of this is thwarting populist political parties in Europe.

Shouldn't Europe instead be addressing the underlying causes that are driving people into the arms of populists?

Anyway....you be the judge. It's 19 minutes long.

like him or hate him. agree or disagree....

that was someone showing leadership and command of the room

can you imagine the former vp addressing that group?
 
48 is very good
Screenshot-2025-02-14-at-6-43-31-PM.png
 
My parents were both public school teachers for almost 80 years combined. Not one has ever heard of a single teacher ever being fired for poor performance. I assume it’s the same in federal government.

I went to school with a guy who got fired from a federal civilian position. Don't know if he was probationary or not at the time. Must have been.

Anyway, they are firing thousands today. And clearly not performance related since it's blanket. I would assume some major class actions will be filed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
I went to school with a guy who got fired from a federal civilian position. Don't know if he was probationary or not at the time. Must have been.

Anyway, they are firing thousands today. And clearly not performance related since it's blanket. I would assume some major class actions will be filed.
Lawsuits be a comin
 
I trust most will want a check and not reinstatement in all of the discharges. I’m sure this was contemplated. Seems musk’s MO
 
I trust most will want a check and not reinstatement in all of the discharges. I’m sure this was contemplated. Seems musk’s MO
Many of these people take the jobs because they want to serve their country in some capacity. It's always at the top or very near the top of the responses for why they like their jobs in every survey I've seen.

Musk might have soured that a bit.
 
Many of these people take the jobs because they want to serve their country in some capacity. It's always at the top or very near the top of the responses for why they like their jobs in every survey I've seen.

Musk might have soured that a bit.
Vulnerable now like most everyone else. Welcome to america. Your job isn’t an entitlement
 
No one said it was.
It sort of has been tho. Hasnt it? As long as you do your job, and don’t engage in misconduct, you can’t be terminated. How many people in the private sector don’t take vacations, work their asses off, and on a Tuesday are told sorry our profits were down. You’re out. Pack everything up now. Today is your last day. We’ll mail ur check. It’s a marked difference isn’t it
 
How many $Millions (borrowed) of Taxpayers funds were paid to AP again?
Anyone?
Buehler?
Buehler?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bailey777
like him or hate him. agree or disagree....

that was someone showing leadership and command of the room

can you imagine the former vp addressing that group?

Look…I loved the speech. I thought it was terrific. The people in that room deserved every word he said.

But imagine how much more credible it would’ve been coming out of Mike Pence’s mouth.

The primary differences between 1/6 and the Romanian election were (1) they had the imprimatur of a court to annul the election, and (2) they were actually successful overturning it.

Granted, the courts confer the annulment full formal legitimacy. But, in reality, it seems obvious to me that they just didn’t like the results. From what I read about it, the allegation that Russian interference was dispositive in the results has about as much credence as the allegation that the 2016 election turned on Russian meddling. Which is…not much.

Anyway, Vance doesn’t have the moral authority to be making that speech. He forfeited that as soon as he demurred on the question of whether or not Biden fairly won the 2020 election.
 
It sort of has been tho. Hasnt it? As long as you do your job, and don’t engage in misconduct, you can’t be terminated. How many people in the private sector don’t take vacations, work their asses off, and on a Tuesday are told sorry our profits were down. You’re out. Pack everything up now. Today is your last day. We’ll mail ur check. It’s a marked difference isn’t it
No. I've explained that poor performers can and are fired. Done it twice. Then of course, it's even easier in the military to separate the bad actors and the poor performers. Done that as well.

Of course it's not the same as many private sector jobs. Didn't say it was. Of course, I couldn't fine a poor private sector employee half a months pay for three months and restrict him to the building for 45 days along with extra duty like I could on ships (change building to ship). I miss that . . .
 
And so? That's like 2% of the adult US population. A lower percentage than 60 years ago. 40% of them are veterans as vets get preference for every Federal job.
In 2000 the federal government employed 1.8 million. In 2024, 2.4 million.

The share of the civilian workforce has remained roughly the same but the absolute numbers have risen considerably.

I guess my question would be, is it necessary that the government grows at the same rate as the population?

That said, I think all these people being laid off should get a decent severance package.
 
In 2000 the federal government employed 1.8 million. In 2024, 2.4 million.

The share of the civilian workforce has remained roughly the same but the absolute numbers have risen considerably.

I guess my question would be, is it necessary that the government grows at the same rate as the population?

That said, I think all these people being laid off should get a decent severance package.

Hard to say. If you are in a public interactive job you probably need more people as population increases. Social Security admin, VA workers, etc....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoopsdoc1978
In 2000 the federal government employed 1.8 million. In 2024, 2.4 million.

The share of the civilian workforce has remained roughly the same but the absolute numbers have risen considerably.

I guess my question would be, is it necessary that the government grows at the same rate as the population?

That said, I think all these people being laid off should get a decent severance package.

I'll add there is zero severance for public employees. Doesn't exist. And it appears that all the probationary employees fired this week were also not eligible for the deferred resignation offer of 8 months pay. That was only for career status Feds
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
In 2000 the federal government employed 1.8 million. In 2024, 2.4 million.

The share of the civilian workforce has remained roughly the same but the absolute numbers have risen considerably.

I guess my question would be, is it necessary that the government grows at the same rate as the population?

That said, I think all these people being laid off should get a decent severance package.
Five million paid 'contractors'.
With private armies, private air forces, construction companies, training and logistics, technicians, ad infinitum, all paid for by US taxpayers(borrowed).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
I guess my question would be, is it necessary that the government grows at the same rate as the population?

Given the highly scripted clerical nature of the govt employees I've interacted with, I would guess that AI should be able to streamline their workflows tremendously -- if the political will to do so is there. But I'm not at all sure that it ever will be.

I get the impression that many people view federal employment as a massive WPA.
 
Given the highly scripted clerical nature of the govt employees I've interacted with, I would guess that AI should be able to streamline their workflows tremendously -- if the political will to do so is there. But I'm not at all sure that it ever will be.

I get the impression that many people view federal employment as a massive WPA.
Ssa for sure re AI
 
Can you imagine how sick and twisted your politics would have to become that you would celebrate 200k US citizens losing their job?

What they lose in that government job,
They will more than gain by getting a better job in a better organization.
 
Last edited:
So once they get through the probationary period they can just prop their feet up, watch Netflix on their phones all day do no work, and never get fired?

That’s a hell of a gig if true.
Two months ago, something less than 20% of Fed employees were in their assigned workplace on any given day. Massive leased buildings, lit, air-conditioned, heated, leased furnishings, IT, sitting mostly empty and unused, at a cost of $Billions(borrowed).
 
Given the highly scripted clerical nature of the govt employees I've interacted with, I would guess that AI should be able to streamline their workflows tremendously -- if the political will to do so is there. But I'm not at all sure that it ever will be.

Tangentially, dealing with the government online has become so much better over the years. I'm talking about the Indiana DMV, the Marion County Health Department (for a birth certificate), the US Treasury for purchasing I-Bonds, etc. If it wasn't for Intuit, we'd all be doing our taxes directly online for free. Lot's more that can and will be done in the future.
 
Given the highly scripted clerical nature of the govt employees I've interacted with, I would guess that AI should be able to streamline their workflows tremendously -- if the political will to do so is there. But I'm not at all sure that it ever will be.

I get the impression that many people view federal employment as a massive WPA.
'..highly scripted clerical nature '..

What does that mean?

What is a clerical nature?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT