No, it’s analogous to refusing to take a drug test administered by your place of employment. Most people do this because they would fail or because they have something to hide. It is that simple.
Joe's potential drug cocktail
- Thread starter 76-1
- Start date
Weak and horny are not exactly peanut butter and jelly
Trump finally realized that all his nonstop claims that Biden is mentally incompetent were backfiring on him, by lowering expectations of Biden's ability. Trump's claims were setting the stage for Biden to greatly exceed the low standard that Trump and other critics had created for Biden.
So Trump has not been talking about Biden's mental health this week, hoping everyone will forget what he said about Biden. I think there's a good chance that both Trump and Biden will look like crap in the debate.
I hate that rule.
If the rule protecting the President is because the government supposedly can't function if the President is distracted by prosecution, isn't that also true about the government's ability to function without a Speaker of the House, Chief Justice, Senate Majority Leader or President of the Senate?
Another factor surely must be the inexcusably careless way Trump stored those documents he wasn't supposed to have.
Trump stored the documents outside their labeled folders, in a bathroom where the boxes tipped over and spilled onto the floor, on the stage of a ballroom where unknown people attended other events and in unlocked closets in unsecured parts of Mar-A-Lago.
Even though Trump claimed a right to have them as a former President, he wasn't protecting them with the care and diligence that a President should use.
If he hadn't lied and obstructed he wouldn't have been charged with lying and obstructing.
Who gives a shit if the rest of the world sees it? You think they shouldn’t see it because he’s unfit but we shouldn’t before casting a vote? Are you suggesting it’s ok to put him in office in spite of this but we just don’t want the rest of the world to know?
You weren't doing it right. lol
I'm glad the stuff that's out there today wasn't there when I did it. The stuff today is 10X more powerful and psychotic episodes from it are real.
Oh sure. That's why he wants a drug test before the debate.
You still listening to that liar about the Apprentice?
No one said Trump is brilliant, but he makes his mistakes while giving long speeches without notes or teleprompter.
Biden gets distracted while taking pictures.
There is a huge difference between the two and any attempt to equate them is just not being honest. DIsliking Trump does not mean he's on Biden's mental level.
Recall the sentence diagrams we did about age 7. Try it with this one:
"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible."
No clear mind comes up with that.
I won't yell at you anymore. You're actually somewhat sane, although wrong about this.There is a difference, one DANC will yell at me for. A lot of people have taken documents they shouldn't have. The ones that tell the government they have them and return them are rarely prosecuted. The ones that are found out about and attempt to obfuscate are usually taken to court. The Christian Science Monitor lists some examples of people, here is one from Alberto Gonzalez who was AG for Bush 43:
An Inspector General report found that he had mishandled U.S. classified information. But DOJ did not move to indict him, citing as one reason the fact that there was no evidence he lied about the situation or tried to hide it from federal agents.Notice no one is going after Pence, who isn't exactly beloved by Democrats. There isn't evidence he mislead. And there isn't evidence it was intentional (Sandy Berger was charged because he went to great effort to take the documents).
Who goes to jail over classified docs – and who doesn’t?
Some experts say higher-level officials are less likely to be prosecuted for mishandling secret information. Others argue it all depends on the details of the case.www.csmonitor.com
Aloha will gladly state that they all should be charged, and he might be right. But I also get the government wanting people who accidentally takes documents to return them. If they are going to go to jail, the desire to cover up the crime instead of coming forward goes way up.
Do you have video of him actually giving this speech? He goes on a tangent many times. It doesn't mean he doesn't make sense. When I read that, it's conversational English - it's not a term paper.
You do know the FBI found other docs Biden had after they turned in the original batch, right?
The FBI had to go find them - they weren't all turned in at first.
Last edited:
Oh, you mean like how Trump called Biden's bluff about the debates - agreeing to everything Joe wanted? Including being on CNN?
So why doesn't Joe call his bluff? You know why.
So Obama accidently took over 30,000 documents?There is a difference, one DANC will yell at me for. A lot of people have taken documents they shouldn't have. The ones that tell the government they have them and return them are rarely prosecuted. The ones that are found out about and attempt to obfuscate are usually taken to court. The Christian Science Monitor lists some examples of people, here is one from Alberto Gonzalez who was AG for Bush 43:
An Inspector General report found that he had mishandled U.S. classified information. But DOJ did not move to indict him, citing as one reason the fact that there was no evidence he lied about the situation or tried to hide it from federal agents.Notice no one is going after Pence, who isn't exactly beloved by Democrats. There isn't evidence he mislead. And there isn't evidence it was intentional (Sandy Berger was charged because he went to great effort to take the documents).
Who goes to jail over classified docs – and who doesn’t?
Some experts say higher-level officials are less likely to be prosecuted for mishandling secret information. Others argue it all depends on the details of the case.
Aloha will gladly state that they all should be charged, and he might be right. But I also get the government wanting people who accidentally takes documents to return them. If they are going to go to jail, the desire to cover up the crime instead of coming forward goes way up.
I can't say it's not,since I can't remember where I saw or heard it. But I did hear it. Clinton too. In fact,almost every President....EVER!. I know...shocker,that they only go after the one guy who they have been going after since 2015.
Last edited:
Obama had record stored in other locations, but they were supposedly under government control.
The Brooklyn Bridge is also for sale.
Clinton had tapes hidden in his sock drawer.
The entire thing is a joke.
He accidentally took documents in that the National Archives has possession of them in Chicago.
Trump baselessly bashed Obama for transferring records from the White House to Chicago. Here's why Obama was allowed while Trump is under scrutiny by the FBI.
The National Archives took it upon itself to dispel Trump's claims.
www.google.com
But yes, it turns out Obama was found with documents. Well, document. And it was not classified.
One thing is clear he is not dropping out. So will not let him. Obama woud have to go through her.
Gabe Hauari
USA TODAY
Jill Biden enthusiastically supports Joe after debate: 'You did such a great job'
Gabe HauariUSA TODAY
