Meanwhile …
U.S. Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) said the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong to legalize interracial marriage nationwide and should have left it to individual states.
www.wfyi.org
Imagine actually coming out and openly admitting that you basically believe "interracial marriage" should have to be regulated or legalized. It's as if you're claiming that a natural attraction should have to meet the approval of someone else. By definition you're setting up the idea that you believe your view is somehow "superior", and dictating to someone else that ideal...
On the flipside Holcomb showed a modicum of rational thought today by vetoing the anti-Trans bill while unfortunately deciding to sign the absolute carry measure. He likely realized his veto would be overridden and he could basically play both sides of the fence, but that seems to be pretty much his niche as a social moderate.
It’s almost unimaginable that someone would say that out loud in 2022, let alone a US Senator.
It’s sadly imaginable that it likely won’t impact him at all.
Sounds like he realized he screwed up, and is walking it back and doing as much CYA damage control as possible...
Seems the line of questioning had him "confused"...
"Earlier during a virtual press conference I misunderstood a line of questioning that ended up being about interracial marriage, and let me be clear on that issue — there is no question the Constitution prohibits discrimination of any kind based on race. That is not something that is even up for debate, and I condemn racism in any form, at all levels and by any states, entities, or individuals,” Braun said.
Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., suggested Tuesday that the legality of interracial marriage was best left for states to decide, then later said he "misunderstood" a series of questions about laws banning such marriages.
www.yahoo.com
It's an admirable attempt, but he sort of misses the point that marriage should not be restricted by law, irrespective of racism.