I fully believe at this point that Coach Mercer is more of an MLB guy. Swing for the fences just in case you connect. New era baseball. Remember when he was hyped as an advanced stats coach and admitted as such in some of his early media interactions. I don't particularly care for it, but I guess it works with some lineups. I'm just old school enough to think putting the ball in play and constantly putting stress on a college defense is a pretty good recipe. Nevermind bunting and playing small ball when in a tight game. We'll see how this all works out come tourney time.
Yes, I know what you mean........
I'd sure like to have a couple of guys like Purdue had a couple of years ago that walked and got HBP a lot, ahead of all our power.
But you can't argue much with success. I took a look at Big 10 stats (all games), and this is what they show:
BA: 265 (6th)
RUNS: 297, 1st by 36 over Michigan. We average 7.2/G, Michigan 6.7, OSU 5.9
2Bs: 82, 2nd to MD's 87
HRs: 72, 1st by 28 over OSU
BB: 178 (5th, but MD leads with only 189)
Ks: 430 (1st by 49 over MD, and almost 100 more than #3)
So....all-in-all we're getting enough BBs to be effective, and the K/HR trade-off seems to work very well.
As you indicate, some of this may reflect beating up on sub-par pitching....how that translates to winning close games in the NCAA tourney remains to be seen.