IU had 10 FR & Soph starters, PU had 9 yesterday

[secondasky]

According to my count.

 

[C Dog]

I believe your count may be off. I only counted nine for IU and Purdue had at least 10. But I get your point as the future seems bright for both programs if the youth on both sides can continue to develop.

 

[ilVecchio]

Bell counts for two. Maybe three.

 

[secondasky]

I believe your count may be off. I only counted nine for IU and Purdue had at least 10. But I get your point as the future seems bright for both programs if the youth on both sides can continue to develop.

I used both schools official sites. But lets say for argument sake you are correct. It still negates the purdue cry that we are so much younger than anyone else.

 

[td75]

I don't follow Purdue football at all, so I couldn't care less what they're doing. Indiana has a very nice nucleus of returning young players next year. Indiana should potentially have another big year!!

The future looks bright for Indiana football!!

 

[Palmbeachhoosier]

According to my count.

Either way it does kind of temper their argument that they are just sooo young.

 

[daddyhoosier]

I literally averaged all participants (not just starters) from Indiana and Purdue a couple weeks ago.

Fr = 1
So = 2
Jr = 3
Sr = 4

PU - 2.24
IU - 2.34

They were very slightly younger than us. I guess that 0.1 is worth 4 wins, huh?

 

[Courtsensetwo]

According to my count.

This is impossible. Have you not read all of the bleating sobbing meltdowns from Laffy?