We've already improved. It's just really hard to see when you're in the B1G where 12 teams are tourney contenders. Not enough to matter but it's there. Also, remember that most analysts picked us 7 to 11th, and outside of the tourney this year, and most media did also. We may not be over performing, but it's not like we're underperforming, is it? We have a lot of flaws in the lineup, which is probably why we were picked so low. I don't know what everyone expected out of this team, but they are where the talent implies they should be. Maybe the results of some bad recruiting mistakes (keeping Green, recruiting Damezi, keeping Moore).. but we just don't have many good players. A patchwork of misfits with glaring flaws in each.. or maybe it's an issue of development? Though judging Miller on Green and Durham's development when they had low ceilings to begin with is probably not using a good sample.
I hate that every game can't just stand alone as a game. It turns into a re-evaluation of the last 30 years, evidence of coaching proficiency (positive or negative) and a judgement on every coach we've had, then also carries the burden of the next 20 years on top of it. That's a lot of weight for one game or even one season to bear.