ADVERTISEMENT

I feel so cheap..

**** Purdue. How did they get a “home” game as a 4 seed over 1 seed Houston?!?! Total bullshit
Same way they got a 5 seed and Michigan got a 4, even though Michigan won the tourney, finished higher than them in conference, and beat them soundly twice in the past month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeStrait IU
Same way they got a 5 seed and Michigan got a 4, even though Michigan won the tourney, finished higher than them in conference, and beat them soundly twice in the past month.
Again, incompetence and laziness by the committee. They looked only at the net and analytics. Not head to head, not how teams were trending at the end, and certainly not the conference tournaments, yet cited “WVU lost their best player” as a reason to keep them out….DeVries was lost in December!!! OU getting in at 6-12 in their league was total BS, and even gave them a 9!!! By utilizing NET they could slot it all by Thursday/Friday unless an AQ bid stealer had to be accommodated. That’s why I say not only were they incompetent. They were lazy.
 
**** Purdue. How did they get a “home” game as a 4 seed over 1 seed Houston?!?! Total bullshit
Indeed. And yet they complain about calls all day long.

When the refs completely missed seeing a ball go off of Caleb Furst in the 1st half, I didn't hear any Purdue fans admitting that they owed Houston one the other way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4IUfourever
Again, incompetence and laziness by the committee. They looked only at the net and analytics. Not head to head, not how teams were trending at the end, and certainly not the conference tournaments, yet cited “WVU lost their best player” as a reason to keep them out….DeVries was lost in December!!! OU getting in at 6-12 in their league was total BS, and even gave them a 9!!! By utilizing NET they could slot it all by Thursday/Friday unless an AQ bid stealer had to be accommodated. That’s why I say not only were they incompetent. They were lazy.
100% correct.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT