I will remain cautiously optimistic and readjust my expectations based on future developments.Awesome. Just more great news to ponder as a fan of this once proud program. The joy just never ends.
That does not sound good. That is a quote from Archie Miller on May 29.
I believe he said they had increased his activity but he was not ready for full activity.That does not sound good. That is a quote from Archie Miller on May 29.
Archle isn't going to fill those spots unless it is a person that can help. He said it again recently that your 12th and 13th players aren't usually very happy about playing time. He hinted of internal issues and chemistry issues that develop from that.Maybe, Archie, should recruit a wing player with one of those two open scholarships.
Archle isn't going to fill those spots unless it is a person that can help. He said it again recently that your 12th and 13th players aren't usually very happy about playing time. He hinted of internal issues and chemistry issues that develop from that.
Priller was the perfect 12th person. He didn't complain about sitting on the bench for 4 years.The last two players are going to either be like Priller or be like Forrester and Moore and leave. Archie has 11 players he wants to stay.
How does news of a player's condition translate to "once proud program?" There's plenty to be proud of if you're an IU basketball fan.Awesome. Just more great news to ponder as a fan of this once proud program. The joy just never ends.
The guys trying out for the NBA are returning. I would think that if it was just because they didn't want to play at IU they would transfer.10 healthy guys on Scholarship. A lot of that is due to guys this spring not wanting to play here.
I think the point is to hold the open scholarships for players that want to be there and have the ability to work their way into the rotation. Gelon, Priller, April, Jurkin, Muniru, Jobe, etc. were wasted scholarships that decreased the level of competition on the team.You're allowed to recruit better players than Priller. Archie is an idiot if his plan was to recruit no wing players this year. Assuming he is not an idiot (which is what I think), he screwed up. I'm not sure why it's that difficult to admit for some fans.
I think the point is to hold the open scholarships for players that want to be there and have the ability to work their way into the rotation. Gelon, Priller, April, Jurkin, Muniru, Jobe, etc. were wasted scholarships that decreased the level of competition on the team.
I think he is right. If we get Jerome Hunter back, we are two deep in every position.He made the comments with the assumption we have 10-11 really good players and no glaring needs on the team. That's not the next year. We are projected to be a 20 win team at best. We literally do not have one fully healthy wing player on the roster. We have several obvious needs and Archie didn't address them.
I think he is right. If we get Jerome Hunter back, we are two deep in every position.
Green / Phinisee
Durham / Hunter
Smith / Anderson
TJD / Thompson
Davis / Brunk
What are your objections?[/QUOTE
Which of those lines gives us an advantage over other B10 teams?
I think he is right. If we get Jerome Hunter back, we are two deep in every position.
Green / Phinisee
Durham / Hunter
Smith / Anderson
TJD / Thompson
Davis / Brunk
What are your objections?
Franklin??I think he is right. If we get Jerome Hunter back, we are two deep in every position.
Green / Phinisee
Durham / Hunter
Smith / Anderson
TJD / Thompson
Davis / Brunk
What are your objections?
You made a lot of points there, and some I agree with. In general, I don’t think you are accounting for players stepping up as they get older and with opportunities available to take on a bigger role. I also don’t think you are seeing how important it was to add two big ten ready big men to our rotation. That allows Smith to start at the three, and Durham to play the two. In other words, we added a starting two guard to our roster by shoring up our front court.He's right? My objection is that's a 20 win team at best (it might be a NIT team again) and he chooses to sit on 2 scholarships. The goal isn't to make the tourney.
Some objections:
*Anderson and Thompson are role players and most likely won't contribute much.
*We have no idea if Hunter will even play, let alone be effective.
*Phinshot 36% from the field last year and disappeared from too many games.
*Green is streaky and turns over the ball too much.
*I like Durham, but he isn't a star and will most likely be forced to play out of position some
*I like our rotation of bigs, but none of them are known scorers and they lack outside shooting.
*We most likely don't have one player who is going to be an all conference player (when is the last time a B10 team finished in the top 4 without one?)
*We lack shooting
We have the roster make up of a team that is going to be up and down and struggle to make the tourney.
Franklin is a contingency plan for Hunter.Franklin??
Along with injuries the step up in ability from one season to the next can be huge. Who will step up?You made a lot of points there, and some I agree with. In general, I don’t think you are accounting for players stepping up as they get older and with opportunities available to take on a bigger role. I also don’t think you are seeing how important it was to add two big ten ready big men to our rotation. That allows Smith to start at the three, and Durham to play the two. In other words, we added a starting two guard to our roster by shoring up our front court.
You made a lot of points there, and some I agree with. In general, I don’t think you are accounting for players stepping up as they get older and with opportunities available to take on a bigger role. I also don’t think you are seeing how important it was to add two big ten ready big men to our rotation. That allows Smith to start at the three, and Durham to play the two. In other words, we added a starting two guard to our roster by shoring up our front court.
He's right? My objection is that's a 20 win team at best (it might be a NIT team again) and he chooses to sit on 2 scholarships. The goal isn't to make the tourney.
Some objections:
*Anderson and Thompson are role players and most likely won't contribute much.
*We have no idea if Hunter will even play, let alone be effective.
*Phin shot 36% from the field last year and disappeared from too many games.
*Green is streaky and turns over the ball too much.
*I like Durham, but he isn't a star and will most likely be forced to play out of position some
*I like our rotation of bigs, but none of them are known scorers and they lack outside shooting.
*We most likely don't have one player who is going to be an all conference player (when is the last time a B10 team finished in the top 4 without one?)
*We lack shooting
We have the roster make up of a team that is going to struggle to make the tourney.
You made a lot of points there, and some I agree with. In general, I don’t think you are accounting for players stepping up as they get older and with opportunities available to take on a bigger role. I also don’t think you are seeing how important it was to add two big ten ready big men to our rotation. That allows Smith to start at the three, and Durham to play the two. In other words, we added a starting two guard to our roster by shoring up our front court.
What positions do Watford and Brooks play? Answer, they are both wings. Archie addressed the needs but was unable to get the guys he was recruiting.He made the comments with the assumption we have 10-11 really good players and no glaring needs on the team. That's not the next year. We are projected to be a 20 win team at best. We literally do not have one fully healthy wing player on the roster. We have several obvious needs and Archie didn't address them.
Haven't you heard? Players are not allowed to improve on any aspect of their games from year to year. Players never get better, never become more comfortable in a system, never understand offensive and defensive schemes any deeper, never get stronger or faster or smarter, never get more in synch with the coach, never improve their skills. They all stay the same.
What positions do Watford and Brooks play? Answer, they are both wings. Archie addressed the needs but was unable to get the guys he was recruiting.
did you know muniru is his first name? muniru bawa. only an idiot like crean could eff that upI think the point is to hold the open scholarships for players that want to be there and have the ability to work their way into the rotation. Gelon, Priller, April, Jurkin, Muniru, Jobe, etc. were wasted scholarships that decreased the level of competition on the team.
unfortunately watford wanted to be paid for his services. glad miller and indiana aren't going that routeWhat positions do Watford and Brooks play? Answer, they are both wings. Archie addressed the needs but was unable to get the guys he was recruiting.
Smith is going to have to improve his shooting and accept his role or sit. It is difficult to play 4 against 5 offensively.I actually thought I was being generous with players improvements by saying they could be a 20 win team. We disagree with Smith. I think we are in trouble if he plays a lot of minutes at the 3 position.