You’re pretty dismissive of beating and biting a woman. I’d say that’s a little bit more than a mistake.No they won’t…son no coach as ever made a mistake in their personal lives?! Should they be blackballed from coaching ever again?
You’re pretty dismissive of beating and biting a woman. I’d say that’s a little bit more than a mistake.No they won’t…son no coach as ever made a mistake in their personal lives?! Should they be blackballed from coaching ever again?
Bet any amount of money he will not even talk to him or his agent.I bet Dolson gives him a look. If IU wants to stay squeaky clean, they better not look at Pearl either.
Would have been quite interesting if we hired him in 2001…I wish IU had hired Pitino shen they hired Woodson. Pitino could have went for the big three ncaa titles! UK, UL & IU. But Pitino isnt like by alot around here.
Why would you guess that? I would guess they thought he was a good basketball coach and didn’t care, like it seems many of you.I would guess, as you have suggested, that Ole Miss did a thorough investigation into the incident and his overall background/history, and found no basis for an ongoing concern. I also agree that he very likely is not interested in leaving there so quickly, he seems to have a good thing going and there's very likely a feeling of gratitude on his part that they gave him the job.
Shoulda been Majerus for 4 years then step aside for Matta in 05... Wait, I've done this before lol.Would have been quite interesting if we hired him in 2001…
How comfortable are the booths at Nicks for a good bang session?Would have been quite interesting if we hired him in 2001…
And his assistant coach has baggage too.No one is disputing he's a really good coach.
You didn't go to IU so I wouldn't expect you to understand.
I bet they already looked at him. I bet it was a no before Texas.Bet any amount of money he will not even talk to him or his agent.
Not very, but apparently he only needs 15 seconds.How comfortable are the booths at Nicks for a good bang session?
He has always pushed the pace.Not very, but apparently he only needs 15 seconds.
Iu north says no. Wife beater. Drinker. Case closed. Iu north has spoken.Relax Vern, just a simple question. I would think Beard would be a Hr hire for IU. Iu currently is seen an underachieving program.
Amongst some other people. But sure...Iu north says no. Wife beater. Drinker. Case closed. Iu north has spoken.
No they don't lolDon't know anything about Ole Miss or the state but it's still a D1 state university in a major conference. They have concerns about image.
I would guess that because they hired him. They had no particular reputation as a basketball powerhouse. No reason to take a risk on a controversial hire. They have an HR department with the same concerns as any big university.Why would you guess that? I would guess they thought he was a good basketball coach and didn’t care, like it seems many of you.
This is year 2 at Ole Miss. He'll leave this year or nextI would guess that because they hired him. They had no particular reputation as a basketball powerhouse. No reason to take a risk on a controversial hire. They have an HR department with the same concerns as any big university.
By the way, I agree with those who think IU would pass on him. I also don't think he would leave Ole Miss after a one year, when he's got them in the top 25.
I'd argue we're getting to that point.Ole Miss bball is more or less nothing, so they have relatively little to lose if a risky hire goes wrong.
Somehow we're still one of the most valuable basketball programs.I'd argue we're getting to that point.
We will not dare touch beard. North has informed dolson. We will bring back woodson before touching beard! Though I would argue woodson was a controversial hire given he had ZERO experience in college.I would guess that because they hired him. They had no particular reputation as a basketball powerhouse. No reason to take a risk on a controversial hire. They have an HR department with the same concerns as any big university.
By the way, I agree with those who think IU would pass on him. I also don't think he would leave Ole Miss after a one year, when he's got them in the top 25.
Wont be Dolson who says no.We will not dare touch beard. North has informed dolson. We will bring back woodson before touching beard! Though I would argue woodson was a controversial hire given he had ZERO experience in college.
I’m out on McCollum, slow pace basketball.I don't get in to the "better" comparisons... I've posted a handful of lists on guys that I think would be successful at Indiana.
Beard, obviously, has proven he's capable of making deep NCAA runs...which is very important. But he's also jumped around a lot, hasn't really shown much that he can maintain a high level program for long stretches...why is it a given that he'd stay at IU? Maybe he'd jump at the Kentucky job in a few years if it opened up, or Kansas as you mentioned? His history shows he's pretty open to jumping ship. Doesn't look like a guy that has turned down many offers before. We can't bash the IU job, saying we aren't gonna attract anyone better, and then just assume a guy that's had 6-7 head coaching jobs in 13 years would stay at IU for 8-10 years. Might as well hire Jim Crutchfield, and hope he has the energy, at age 69, to coach for 4-5 more years, if you're willing to overlook Beard's history, and take that risk on.
Long winded way of providing examples on why he isn't an obviously perfect fit...and none of that mentions his DV issue.
I'd take McCollum over Beard. And I'm much less sure I like McCollum's style than I was even a few weeks ago.
Mistake thenBet any amount of money he will not even talk to him or his agent.
You suspect wrong. He is one of the top coaches in College BB and has proven track results. What record are you looking at? Fine if the dropped case is why you wouldn't hire him. Making up cr@p like his coaching isn't good enough or people only want him because of ties to Knight are dumb. UNLV wanted him. Texas Tech wanted him. Texas wanted him. Ole Miss wanted him. Someone if not IU will take him from Ole Miss.Does it? What about it? I said he’s a good coach. His record says that. Nothing says he’s an exceptional coach. I suspect many in here think he is because of his RMK ties. Blah.
Beard hasnt hopped around as much as you think.I don't get in to the "better" comparisons... I've posted a handful of lists on guys that I think would be successful at Indiana.
Beard, obviously, has proven he's capable of making deep NCAA runs...which is very important. But he's also jumped around a lot, hasn't really shown much that he can maintain a high level program for long stretches...why is it a given that he'd stay at IU? Maybe he'd jump at the Kentucky job in a few years if it opened up, or Kansas as you mentioned? His history shows he's pretty open to jumping ship. Doesn't look like a guy that has turned down many offers before. We can't bash the IU job, saying we aren't gonna attract anyone better, and then just assume a guy that's had 6-7 head coaching jobs in 13 years would stay at IU for 8-10 years. Might as well hire Jim Crutchfield, and hope he has the energy, at age 69, to coach for 4-5 more years, if you're willing to overlook Beard's history, and take that risk on.
Long winded way of providing examples on why he isn't an obviously perfect fit...and none of that mentions his DV issue.
I'd take McCollum over Beard. And I'm much less sure I like McCollum's style than I was even a few weeks ago.
That’s exactly why they would rush it. They have no reputation to lose.I would guess that because they hired him. They had no particular reputation as a basketball powerhouse. No reason to take a risk on a controversial hire. They have an HR department with the same concerns as any big university.
By the way, I agree with those who think IU would pass on him. I also don't think he would leave Ole Miss after a one year, when he's got them in the top 25.
IU had the most controversial coach in history in RMK.That’s exactly why they would rush it. They have no reputation to lose.
Do you think your beloved Notre Dame would hire Beard?IU had the most controversial coach in history in RMK.
Yep stuffed guys in trash cans, etc. But Beard has been tried and convicted in a court of law. Oh wait no just by message board guys.IU had the most controversial coach in history in RMK.
Basically no one wanted him the day after his DV incident happened, until Ole Miss did...almost 2 years after it happened. The Browns mortgaged their franchise on Deshaun Watson...there will always be teams and programs desperate enough to take on the risks.You suspect wrong. He is one of the top coaches in College BB and has proven track results. What record are you looking at? Fine if the dropped case is why you wouldn't hire him. Making up cr@p like his coaching isn't good enough or people only want him because of ties to Knight are dumb. UNLV wanted him. Texas Tech wanted him. Texas wanted him. Ole Miss wanted him. Someone if not IU will take him from Ole Miss.
He would for sure. So would Sampson. Too old though maybe?Chris Beard with IU resources would absolutely succeed. That coupled with the fact he's only 51, we would have him for awhile. I am not saying he is the only option but that is the level of past success IU needs to set the bar at.