Let’s get them. 2019 wont be a great year. 2020 with hauser bros and development we’ll win big ten
Yes.I would be a bit shocked if they do not end up playing for Bucky.
I would be a bit shocked if they do not end up playing for Bucky.
I think Marquette can block transfers. No? Would think their rival would be the first on the list. I've heard Virginia is the front runner but also wouldn't be shocked to see them at Nebraska. These guys fit Hoiberg's style and he's known to build his rosters via the transfer market.
Conferences can still block transfers within the conference. I don't know if that applies to grad transfers or not. These new rules came after Max Bielfeldt came to IU so maybe he got approval from UM or the grad transfer rules that were in place then already allowed it.Marquette can't block a transfer to Wisconsin. Schools used to try to block kids from choosing certain schools when the kid was asking out of their NLI before they got to school for the freshman year, either because of a coaching change or some other reason. I think that's become rare.
The BIG schools did have an agreement that we wouldn't provide a scholarship to a transferring student athlete from another BIG school...but I think that agreement went by the wayside around the time graduate transfers became a thing. Not sure about that...I remember that Luke Recker skirted that rule, perhaps due to a hardship...and I remember Belein grousing a little bit about Bielfeldt...
Win the Big Ten?! Who are you assuming we land as our next coach?Let’s get them. 2019 wont be a great year. 2020 with hauser bros and development we’ll win big ten
Win the Big Ten?! Who are you assuming we land as our next coach?
You failed at making predictions a long time ago. The adults are handling it now. Please see yourself out.Do another act, Baboso. This one is tired ..
Win the Big Ten?! Who are you assuming we land as our next coach?
I don't think they can "block" transfers under any circumstances. They don't; however, have to make it easier for them. If these guys have graduated, which I doubt, they have to sit a year, and to be honest it really raises questions in my mind why the hell they are both transferring when they were both major contributors to a pretty good team returning a lottery pick next year. Why? There must be disfunction there and we have enough without them. No need to waste scholarships on whatever drama is going on there.I think Marquette can block transfers. No? Would think their rival would be the first on the list. I've heard Virginia is the front runner but also wouldn't be shocked to see them at Nebraska. These guys fit Hoiberg's style and he's known to build his rosters via the transfer market.
Edit: answered my own question. Coaches/schools no longer have the ability to restrict where a player transferring can go.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...that-ends-coaches-ability-to-block-transfers/
Agree to disagree there.Miller is better than Coach Clappy, and Coach Clapster won it twice!
It's unfortunate I somewhat agree … pick your poison, sucky O or sucky D … that's what I see, and neither was great at their "specialty"Agree to disagree there.
No contest. Archie is a better game coach than Crean. Crean's excessive turnovers and no D will lose close games almost every time.Agree to disagree there.
There’s absolutely zero evidence to support this. Archie was blown out by Indiana St and IPFW then lost 12 of 13. Crean would never do that. And he’s Ten times more accomplished than Archie.No contest. Archie is a better game coach than Crean. Crean's excessive turnovers and no D will lose close games almost every time.
At the same age? I disagree.There’s absolutely zero evidence to support this. Archie was blown out by Indiana St and IPFW then lost 12 of 13. Crean would never do that. And he’s Ten times more accomplished than Archie.
You failed at making predictions a long time ago. The adults are handling it now. Please see yourself out.
Yes. By age 40 Crean had coached in a major conference at Marquette for 7 years, had a Final Four appearance, and had produced guys like Wade, Novak, Diener, and many more. No comparison.At the same age? I disagree.
IU needs to hire Larry Brown then.
Yes. By age 40 Crean had coached in a major conference at Marquette for 7 years, had a Final Four appearance, and had produced guys like Wade, Novak, Diener, and many more. No comparison.
Several more facts that some don’t want to accept.
If we don't have one or two solid players ready or close to committing then we should talk to them. They supposedly want to be a package deal and made this move late when many schools don't have 2 spots they can fill or want to wait a year to get them on the court.Let’s get them. 2019 wont be a great year. 2020 with hauser bros and development we’ll win big ten
Crean developed all of those guys while Marquette was in Conference USA. And one game in the Elite 8 is worth a lot more than one game. You’re reaching big time because of your bias.Took you off ignore one time and I see this chuckle-head response.
You mean Marquette gets better players than Dayton? Lol
Crean was not more accomplished than Archie by 40 —- call it a toss up if you want. Crean got one game further but still hasn’t strung together 4 tourney appearance...and was not a great winner of league titles at Marquette. Lol.
Okay, putting you back where you belong. I just don’t get the trauma-induced posting. Did Bob Knight choke you that one time you went on a kayaking trip with him? You are a troll or a seriously f***** dude. Anyway, good luck with your life choices.
I hated crean but thats a stretch. Until archie makes the tourney im not impressed.No contest. Archie is a better game coach than Crean. Crean's excessive turnovers and no D will lose close games almost every time.
You failed at making predictions a long time ago. The adults are handling it now. Please see yourself out.
Only 3 years, douche.Yes. By age 40 Crean had coached in a major conference at Marquette for 7 years, had a Final Four appearance, and had produced guys like Wade, Novak, Diener, and many more. No comparison.
Several more facts that some don’t want to accept.
IU was never even mentioned with them at all so none of it is a shock. The only sort of surprise it neither one picked Wisconsin.I'm almost amazed that someone hasn't posted something along this line. Neither of the Hauser Brothers transferred to IU, the sky is falling, and because of this we must fire Archie Miller immediately. Obviously this is a sarcastic position aimed at those who do nothing but post that we must fire Archie under any and all circumstances, for any reason or no reason.
I didn't mean to imply that it was a shock that neither chose IU. I was simply poking fun at the Fire Archie Immediately Crowd and the thought process they sometimes display. Maybe if we took a look at the Wisconsin Basketball Board, some of their posters would be calling for Greg Gard's firing because Wisconsin didn't get one or both of them.IU was never even mentioned with them at all so none of it is a shock. The only sort of surprise it neither one picked Wisconsin.
I didn't mean to imply that it was a shock that neither chose IU. I was simply poking fun at the Fire Archie Immediately Crowd and the thought process they sometimes display. Maybe if we took a look at the Wisconsin Basketball Board, some of their posters would be calling for Greg Gard's firing because Wisconsin didn't get one or both of them.
But he would be so much better a Coach than Archie. Oh wait, didn't they get blown out by Oregon by 18 points in the first round f the NCAA Tournament?Geez, now you did it...the FAIC will now start the "Hire Gard" drumbeat.
Well we missed every recruit we went after this spring so I think we are all num to it at this point to be honest.I didn't mean to imply that it was a shock that neither chose IU. I was simply poking fun at the Fire Archie Immediately Crowd and the thought process they sometimes display. Maybe if we took a look at the Wisconsin Basketball Board, some of their posters would be calling for Greg Gard's firing because Wisconsin didn't get one or both of them.
Well we missed every recruit we went after this spring so I think we are all num to it at this point to be honest.
1-12 will do that.Well we missed every recruit we went after this spring so I think we are all num to it at this point to be honest.
Guys generally want to transfer to a place to either be ‘the man’ and help their NBA hopes, or to a proven winner with a chance to make a Final Four.
Archie offers these guys neither.
MSU and Virg do.
Probably explains why Archie couldn't come through w grad transfers, and is eating 2 scholarships.
Do you think Archie helped Romeo’s NBA chances?Interesting observation since Romeo is going pro and who knows, maybe Juan gets drafted too and if he does, IMO Archie help develop him.
I doubt Archie feels like he is eating anything. IIRC, he pretty clearly stated early on that he has no problem with less than 13 scholarship players. He doesn't panic or feel the compulsion to use all 13.
Interesting observation since Romeo is going pro and who knows, maybe Juan gets drafted too and if he does, IMO Archie help develop him.
I doubt Archie feels like he is eating anything. IIRC, he pretty clearly stated early on that he has no problem with less than 13 scholarship players. He doesn't panic or feel the compulsion to use all 13.
I have no problem eating a scholly or 2, but when you have glaring holes to fill and it appears you are eating them because you can't get a decent player to fill them...that raises a flag to me.
Do you think Archie helped Romeo’s NBA chances?