You can't make this up. Hotel workers? Wonder why that is?
I thought illegal was illegal. I'm sure MAGA won't agree, right?
Hahahahahahaha
- Thread starter Baller23Boogie
- Start date
You can't make this up. Hotel workers? Wonder why that is?
I thought illegal was illegal. I'm sure MAGA won't agree, right?
And, are we STILL being spied on by China through the TikToK? I thought it was a matter of national security.
Seems like good policy. Those who leave of their own volition will be given preferential ability to re-enter. Farmers who submit a written request on behalf of their employee(s) may get a temporary stay wrt deportation.
They’re not in conflict. What Trump is talking about in the video you posted is getting these people legal status of some sort.
Grasping at straws. Pathetic.
You're the one saying it's good policy for farmers to use illegals in your words "paid next to nothing".
Hypocrite
What that video sounds like is a pathway to documentation and the employers being subject to the labor laws that comes with it.
Aren't the employers subject to those labor laws already?
Not administration related, but putting it here because the answer is so nonchalant and common sense.
Sometimes, people need to stop and think.
The problem wasn’t letting her finish, it was letting her start.
You get a SS benefit for your kid dying? Kids are expensive as hell already. Losing one is already a benefit to the tune of 1000’s of dollars a month.
Frankly I’m surprised there isn’t more filicide with this kind of moral hazard hanging out there.
Reading comprehension: FAIL
I am curious of the logistics of this. Yes, I understand children can and do receive benefits. But how is the account registered and paid? Is the account actually listed in the child's name? I suppose the payment is made to a guardianship bank account. Or is the account still listed in deceased parents name but the child as beneficiary?
So, how does SS list the owner? When my company runs a report for inherited IRA's, the report lists the deceased person, DOB, and SS# as owner and child as beneficiary. So both Jeanine and Jessica could be correct.
I know when my wife's brother died (he was 31 with two sons ages 2 and 4), they were drawing benefits. Their mom was collecting for them since she was still their sole guardian. I'm not sure how it was titled, but it's safe to assume that the kids would have to be primarily of some sort since they were the effected party.
Anyway, the way I interpreted the video, and I'm sure many would have if that answer wasn't provided, was that there was fraud being done. That's just not true. Don't try and spin this any other way.
I didn't watch the video. I was just wondering if anyone knew. But the kids cannot be drawing benefits in their name. They are minors so the income would need to have a guardian or rep payee.
But again, both Jeanine and Jessica could be correct. I just don't know how the SS system registers the recipients.
A kid could also SSI if they are disabled, so there are several ways for children to be getting money.
This isn't a both could be right if you watched the video.
Kids can also draw on behalf of their parents if the parent is disabled or has passed.
Yeah, I don't understand why kids drawing is even brought up. This makes the right look like they don't know what they are doing.
They're being ham handed about it. Unfortunately, if you're going to make large fundamental changes, you have to do it fast and that means mistakes. Just fix the mistakes as quickly as you can.
If you don't blitz it, nothing will ever change.
At least the illegals know which profession to go into.
Anyone that supports this can give up their complaints about illegals
Sigh! I am not questioning whether children can receive it. I am questioning the REPORTING SYSTEM.
Have you seen the report showing recipients' ages? I bet the answer is no.
If the SS report says: Bob Smith, 45, bene Tommy, age 9. Jessica is correct.
If the SS report says Bob Smith, 5, bene Tommy, age 9, then maybe there is fraud. And therefore Jeanine is correct.
I don't know what the report looks like. My guess is there is some fraud, but most are correct. How much is fraud? IDK.
