ADVERTISEMENT

Fishy fires in California: Nothing to see here, people.

Over 14,000 homes burnt down in one fire? Is that really possible? Houses burning while trees are unaffected? Car wheels melting? Toilets and appliances burning up? Can you say "directed energy weapon?"

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/12...spiracies-link-wildfires-to-takeover-schemes/

kroqr.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamieDimonsBalls
Over 14,000 homes burnt down in one fire? Is that really possible? Houses burning while trees are unaffected? Car wheels melting? Toilets and appliances burning up? Can you say "directed energy weapon?"

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/12...spiracies-link-wildfires-to-takeover-schemes/

Thanks for posting. This is a really interesting topic. Do you have any more information about it? I'm sure everyone would love to read more detail about the kind of directed energy weapon used here. Would any kind of giant reflective barrier help protect us from future attacks? Looking forward to a productive discussion about this important issue.
 
Thanks for posting. This is a really interesting topic. Do you have any more information about it? I'm sure everyone would love to read more detail about the kind of directed energy weapon used here. Would any kind of giant reflective barrier help protect us from future attacks? Looking forward to a productive discussion about this important issue.
You'll have to google it, as i am doing. The original link that I provided gave quite a bit of info. Let's all just hope it isn't true. It fits in with weather manipulation theories.
 
Last edited:

Let me preface the following statement with a little bit of background info. If you were to ask those closest to me, they may say that I am prone to spending my time in a number of pursuits that they would deem a waste of time. I have been known to research topics, experiment in my pursuits and hobbies just for the sake of curiosity and expanding knowledge. All that being said, I feel like the 15:40 I spent watching the video you posted as wasted time (though I did like the first comment in the video, debunking much of the content in the video, posted by a 30 plus year firefighter). Watching that video and listening to the poster's reasoning was like Déjà vu, as many of the points being made were the same ones made and debunked time and again in the 9/11 Truther movement videos.
 
Let me preface the following statement with a little bit of background info. If you were to ask those closest to me, they may say that I am prone to spending my time in a number of pursuits that they would deem a waste of time. I have been known to research topics, experiment in my pursuits and hobbies just for the sake of curiosity and expanding knowledge. All that being said, I feel like the 15:40 I spent watching the video you posted as wasted time (though I did like the first comment in the video, debunking much of the content in the video, posted by a 30 plus year firefighter). Watching that video and listening to the poster's reasoning was like Déjà vu, as many of the points being made were the same ones made and debunked time and again in the 9/11 Truther movement videos.
Please explain how you debunked the video. Thank you.
 
I’m glad someone is willing to talk about this. If these weapons fall into the wrong hands, Democrat hands, we could end up with something awful, like peace.
 
You'll have to google it, as i am doing. The original link that I provided gave quite a bit of info. Let's all just hope it isn't true. It fits in with weather manipulation theories.

Not really much to talk about then, huh? Well...thanks for stopping by.
 
Please explain how you debunked the video. Thank you.

Reread my post. Nowhere in it did I say or imply that I debunked the video or the several 9/11 truther videos talking about melting points, fire and all that other happy horseshit. I said an expert (30 year firefighter) debunked most of that video in one of the first comments. But if you want, I can link several debunks for this video, the same claims about 2017 wildfires, the same.similar claims about the towers:

https://www.sciencealert.com/this-f...-wildfires-are-a-conspiracy-science-disagrees
https://www.metabunk.org/explained-...vidence-of-secret-energy-weapons.t9168/page-2
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-c...ctly-path-of-the-proposed-rail-system.t10138/
https://www.metabunk.org/november-f...adise-camp-fire-hill-and-woolsey-fire.t10120/
https://www.metabunk.org/carr-fire-in-redding-northern-california.t9893/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/conspiracists-blame-california-fires-on-airborne-laser-guns
https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/fires/article221651030.html
https://www.weeklystandard.com/holm...rted-by-the-u-s-government-using-space-lasers
https://www.inverse.com/article/50988-california-wildfire-conspiracies-are-nonsense
https://www.iflscience.com/environm...-being-spread-about-the-california-wildfires/
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46304972

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/9/11
http://www.debunking911.com/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/05/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked

This took 5 minutes. A person could spend the next 10 years reviewing these two topics and find 99% of the true evidence and real experts debunks these conspiracies, but people such as yourself will willfully ignore them in favor of believing the fractional minority opinion because you want to believe it. Instead of looking @ all the evidence objectively and coming to an educated conclusion, you come to a conclusion and seek out evidence to support it, eschewing anything that contradicts it.
 
Let me preface the following statement with a little bit of background info. If you were to ask those closest to me, they may say that I am prone to spending my time in a number of pursuits that they would deem a waste of time. I have been known to research topics, experiment in my pursuits and hobbies just for the sake of curiosity and expanding knowledge. All that being said, I feel like the 15:40 I spent watching the video you posted as wasted time (though I did like the first comment in the video, debunking much of the content in the video, posted by a 30 plus year firefighter). Watching that video and listening to the poster's reasoning was like Déjà vu, as many of the points being made were the same ones made and debunked time and again in the 9/11 Truther movement videos.


First clue should have been it came from a channel called "Flat Earth Talk".
 
First clue should have been it came from a channel called "Flat Earth Talk".

Fair point, but I tend not to discount stories due only to their origin, if only for the sake to educate myself on their wacky viewpoints.

I am sometimes pleasantly surprised by some of the content I find at some far flung and far out spots on the web...not this time though VBG.
 
Reread my post. Nowhere in it did I say or imply that I debunked the video or the several 9/11 truther videos talking about melting points, fire and all that other happy horseshit. I said an expert (30 year firefighter) debunked most of that video in one of the first comments. But if you want, I can link several debunks for this video, the same claims about 2017 wildfires, the same.similar claims about the towers:

https://www.sciencealert.com/this-f...-wildfires-are-a-conspiracy-science-disagrees
https://www.metabunk.org/explained-...vidence-of-secret-energy-weapons.t9168/page-2
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-c...ctly-path-of-the-proposed-rail-system.t10138/
https://www.metabunk.org/november-f...adise-camp-fire-hill-and-woolsey-fire.t10120/
https://www.metabunk.org/carr-fire-in-redding-northern-california.t9893/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/conspiracists-blame-california-fires-on-airborne-laser-guns
https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/fires/article221651030.html
https://www.weeklystandard.com/holm...rted-by-the-u-s-government-using-space-lasers
https://www.inverse.com/article/50988-california-wildfire-conspiracies-are-nonsense
https://www.iflscience.com/environm...-being-spread-about-the-california-wildfires/
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46304972

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/9/11
http://www.debunking911.com/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/05/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked

This took 5 minutes. A person could spend the next 10 years reviewing these two topics and find 99% of the true evidence and real experts debunks these conspiracies, but people such as yourself will willfully ignore them in favor of believing the fractional minority opinion because you want to believe it. Instead of looking @ all the evidence objectively and coming to an educated conclusion, you come to a conclusion and seek out evidence to support it, eschewing anything that contradicts it.
I just want to know the truth. I must have missed the debunking statement you are alluding to. All i saw was the evidence supporting a conspiracy. It will take a long time to watch all of your links.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT