IU finished #10 behind Arizona St,Boise State and even Tennessee,so freaking ridiculous.
Final AP Poll
- Thread starter CC Mac
- Start date
Let’s see what the other final rankings show. IU should definitely be ahead of Boise State.
Yes and not a word from them about how Tennessee embarrassed themselves with that pitiful showing at Ohio State,especially after they did all that mouthing off prior to the game.
Last edited:
BT had 4 of the first 10, but only 5 of the first 25. Top heavy league right now with Nebraska, USC, Washington, UCLA, Iowa & Wisconsin all having meh years.
You are talking about ESECPN correct, owned by Disney where fantasies do come true.
I thought voter bias would have snuck Michigan into the top 25
We had no balls against ND, made us look worse. Cig said it himself recently, that we played too conservatively.
Of COURSE we'd kick those other team asses! (Thinking Tennessee, Boise, ASU.) We know that. But 10th is OK!
Indiana Hoosiers finished 10th in the polls and made the initial 12 team CFP!
First year with a new regime. Whoot!
Of COURSE we'd kick those other team asses! (Thinking Tennessee, Boise, ASU.) We know that. But 10th is OK!
Indiana Hoosiers finished 10th in the polls and made the initial 12 team CFP!
First year with a new regime. Whoot!
And in the world according to Cig we tied for 3rd. Because 'on the field' only the number 1 and number 2 teams in the country beat us, and may have needed their home field advantage to do it.
He's got a point. 10th is just some opinion...
,
He's got a point. 10th is just some opinion...
,
To be fair, we only dropped one spot in the AP poll. TN dropped 2. Boise State was already ahead of us in the AP poll. We were just ahead of them in the CFP rankings.
As for the other teams you mentioned, Nebraska finished as a 7-win team. Iowa finished as an 8-win team. USC was a 7-win team. Had IU been the usual IU, Nebraska would've been a 8-win team and Michigan would've been a 9-win team. Washington 7-win. UCLA and MSU would've been 6-win bowl teams. Suddenly our schedule would've been considered really tough by the pundits. ha But instead, IU wins and that must mean everyone sux! Oh the pundits....
still top ten....not bad for IUFB
or most any program for that matter
though at the end of the day polls don't mean sh!t, just something for people to argue about
the future is bright
or most any program for that matter
though at the end of the day polls don't mean sh!t, just something for people to argue about
the future is bright
Heck of a trick by Arizona State to lose and improve three positions.
Well, they did take Texas into overtime. I guess that was worth something to the voters.
If someone had told me we'd be ranked at the top 10 at the end of the year....still top ten....not bad for IUFB
or most any program for that matter
though at the end of the day polls don't mean sh!t, just something for people to argue about
the future is bright
All the blah blah blah is just that. Just noise for us and these boards. Doesn't matter. Year 1 of a new regime, top 10 finish... like you said... Not bad.
My take:
1) tOSU
2) ND
3) Oregon (undefeated, B1G champs)
4) Penn St (closer games against 1&2 than us)
5) IU
6) After IU, who cares?!
1) tOSU
2) ND
3) Oregon (undefeated, B1G champs)
4) Penn St (closer games against 1&2 than us)
5) IU
6) After IU, who cares?!
