Not news, but let's review.
Drone view led to the strike. From the air, it looked like explosives being put into the car. Tragically, it was water containers. A terrible but understandable mistake.
But remember the "secondary explosions" explanation that was trotted out in explanation for the civilian deaths? That strike would have been monitored as well, so it was obviously an immediate and outright lie. Who came up with that lie? Has he or she been relieved of duty? Where stands the investigation?