Covid restrictions are on the way back
- Thread starter Ty Webb iu
- Start date
He's usually "pants on fire" wrong, though soemtimes he is merely "mostly wrong"
Fact-checks | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
www.politifact.com
Ohhhh I think things will get plenty crazy the closer the election gets. They got completely whacked during the last one. Tucker is not stupid and knows who is running the show. For him to just come out and say it is a kick right in the groin.
Another paid source you used. DENIED BeeeyaaaayatchhhHe's usually "pants on fire" wrong, though soemtimes he is merely "mostly wrong"
Fact-checks | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
No way that kind of talk gets him more followers, right?
C'mon man...it's what entertainers do.
Goat did it...He wont admit it though. He prolly got mad cause I called it a money laundering government operation. Trump gone, start a war and keep the elites richer while our tax dollars go from us to Ukraine (cut), the Mic (cut), politicians (cut). Meanwhile the people of Maui get ph***ed.
When we had you and cray and DANC and ftw and mattndallas all rowing together. Working off some TRUTH pose dropped, imploring us to hold the line, it was a thing of beauty wasn’t it?! Ah. Things change. Sucks.
No he attacks them now without fear. Tucker already has a huge following. Now that he has left Fox he has no guidelines so he rolls. Wish more journalists would do that.
That thread is restricted to serious discussion.
Lie all of the time, instead of just most of the time? Run with even more outlandish lies?
It was a thing of beauty, wasn't it? Sadly, when fighting the opponent was the equivalent to pouring salt on slugs......... Even that gets boring eventually. Tracking the left on this board (most of them, not all) is like tracking a legless woman on a beach. Leaves a moist snail trail.
I'm pretty sure FTW can pull that off. @stollcpa ! ! !! ! ! ! When that was created, Goat in all of his glory just hand picked people that were not allow to participate. That is what IM is for. Creating a topic and then picking your preferred participants is called an echo chamber, BUT it is the DNC way.
well brace yourself to lose your shit bc trump will never be president again. he won't even be on the ballot of many states. he will be constitutionally disqualified. you can refer back to this post when it happens. but it will
Interesting, Although I am not married to Trump. What exactly will make him constitutionally disqualified? Has there been an "Hawaiian" birth cert uncovered?
States are already trying to take him off the ballot. IDK about constitutionally.
Sec 3 of the 14th. States who want him off will have grounds in support of same
There wll only be a 14th Amendment issue if Trump is convicted of the Jan 6 charges before the election, and he will find every way possible to delay a trial. This is a guy who would have dressed in drag and put on lipstick to get on the lifeboats of the Titanic.
Politifact publishes the names of anyone giving them >$1,000 in their annual report.
They are paid by normal people who appreciate unbiased fact-checking with sources disclosed.
You would do well to check some of your crap-filled posts now and then with snopes or with politifact.
Who Pays For PolitiFact? | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
www.politifact.com
Do you think that there is any possibility, that Donny and his representation/ election guidance team, have considered this potential possibility? Maybe briefly threw it out in a meeting?
Calculate the gains made by people who took NO risk, vrs those who made calculated risk.
I want a Scott/ Tulsi team. But your "other" team BS against Trump is wet tampon level crap. With all due respect coach.
Just shut up shooter. The dumba$$es you praise are behind all that crap! Screw them. Whatever fact check says the opposite is usually true.Politifact publishes the names of anyone giving them >$1,000 in their annual report.
They are paid by normal people who appreciate unbiased fact-checking with sources disclosed.
You would do well to check some of your crap-filled posts now and then with snopes or with politifact.
Who Pays For PolitiFact? | PolitiFact
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
I don’t know what other team means. I’m just saying if states want trump left out they have grounds
Nope. A conviction would help, but it's not necessary at all. This is a Constitutional/political question, not a criminal/legal one.
Do you think, for example, that it's true that "far more kids in the USA die of drowning in bathtubs than from gunshot wounds?" That's a Tucker gem. Or that "the USA ended slavery around the world"??
I mean. c'mon.
THINK
I mean. c'mon.
THINK
But there has to be a basis to determine if the person did or did not provide aid and comfort to an enemy or engage in insurrection. A judge or jury ruling does that. I'm nor sure that anything short of that really does, unfortunately.
Last edited:
Other team means that you are anti trump, all the time, every time. It's the pub side of TDS. There's a good chance that I won't support him in the primary, but in the general, I don't see anyone that is better for the country once we get to the general.
And my point was, even if state's have grounds and statute, don't you think the Trump team has considered it in their calculations?
no i don't think the trump team considers anything, or they are morons, or both. if they considered things he wouldn't be indicted 4x
Coach, I am sorry that you can't see the stratagy for the indictments (Forrest for the trees).
This is a total "we will not transfer/lose power at any cost" left, very well organized, war footing. Donnie hasn't done shit different that anyone DC, except he said he would expose them. It you can't see this I am very sorry.
no. the belief of election officials is enough.
now it would give rise to a legal war, but ....
It would no doubt be litigated. But that comes after a state election official (like the MI Secretary of State) determines that 14.3 makes him ineligible and prevents him from being placed on the ballot.
