No compaison in the two players. Brunk is an upgrade for IU. Fitzner was a 6'10" finesse perimeter shooter who lost his shooting touch at IU and was not a banger in the paint. 6'11" Brunk is the opposite, an effective, productive banger in the paint which is something IU needs. Brunk fills an immediate Roster Need = good fit.Hopefully this time it works Fitzner was a bad signing.
If it wasn't for all the balls that clanked and didn't go down he would have been a good pick up. LoL. He does seem like a good kid though. I wish him the best in life.Hopefully this time it works Fitzner was a bad signing.
I still wonder how Fitzner a 43% 3pt shooter suddenly lost his shooting touch after the Marquette game?If it wasn't for all the balls that clanked and didn't go down he would have been a good pick up. LoL. He does seem like a good kid though. I wish him the best in life.