Biden/Mask/SMH

[Bulk VanderHuge]

He brought out the very worst in a lot of very corrupt individuals.

Yes, he did.

 

[anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa]

He didn't expose anything. If you couldn't see that fox is conservative, you're blind or CNN is hard left, you're blind. That's not exposing, that's pointing out something that was out in the open for the dumb people in the back.

Trump is now saying that CNN should turn conservative because Fox won't push 2000 mules. He's literally turned on every news station that doesn't push his agenda. If they don't do what he wants, he turns and they become the "fake news".

He's running out of networks. He'll have Newsmax (am i spelling it correctly) and OANN on the right that I believe he still thinks is on his side. If he's elected, it'll get really interesting because neither i believe are on major streaming services to my knowledge.

Hard disagree. Before Trump, CNN and the NYT and WaPo at least veiled their electioneering. They’re frauds.

Yes, everyone knew about Fox and MSNBC. But CNN and the Gray Lady are dead. Completely partisan and shameless about it.

 

[iuwclurker]

1) merit should always be the benchmark. Not status of how one identifies. We have laws to protect from discrimination.
2) when you set this as your objective you are limiting the pool of talent
3) it's pretty clear how out inept this administration has been - and its basis for hiring, its stated basis, has been clear
4) it does no favors to any of these people. If they aren't qualified it will show and impact future hiring. And if they prove qualified there will still be a stigma/asterisk. Better to hire a black female tranny and say nothing about it.

At this point only the most blindly partisan would believe this is a competent administration

In short, yes.