Yeah sure. đź‘Ť I
Biden has cancer.
- Thread starter dbmhoosier
- Start date
Yes and yes. Easy case is when he’s standing for election.
Both affect (or could affect) his performance. To rob voters of that knowledge is anti-democratic.
I'm old enough to remember when Hilary was close to death while running in 2016.
I agree completely. How can somebody be expected to make an informed vote otherwise?
Saw today where Biden camp has said that his last prostate screening was done in 2014. If that's true, it would certainly explain why they hadn't caught this earlier. And, apparently, it's not uncommon to stop doing some of this at a certain age.
My two questions about this are:
1) Why? What's the downside to doing a PSA test and, er, that other exam?
2) Even if that is common, wouldn't we think that a VPOTUS/POTUS would still be getting them, even if most septuagenarians aren't?
How different is that from politicians that break promises that they made during the campaign or in a more recent situation claim to know nothing of Project 2025 but then implement after elected?
Unfortunately bamboozling voters is too common.
She almost dropped dead at that 9/11 event. Then fell down a bunch of stairs in India. Certainly didn't look well at times. Maybe the adrenochrome was just running low.
Okay makes sense if he's running for reelection. What if he's not?
Good question…do we extend that knowledge to individuals/companies that are making hiring decisions?
Running period, whether for reelection or for election. Even in the 2020 primary if he had a public cancer diagnosis there would've been a good chance he doesn't win the nomination.
My understanding of Project 2025 is that it's a laundry list of agenda items that have been on conservative planning tables for years. One of them I know of is expanding school choice -- which is something I've advocated for decades.
Does my advocacy of school choice, and the fact that it also appears in Project 2025, make me a covert advocate for Project 2025 writ large?
Or must I actively disavow each and every line item they have in order to be exonerated from Project 2025 advocacy?
Yet the people that penned Project 2025 were not just random conservatives but in Trump's inner circle and authors are now staffing his administration. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...-now-staffing-trump-administration-rcna195107
Claiming ignorance of project 2025 was a flat out lie in my opinion.
No, your advocacy for school choice just makes you wrong
Last edited:
Yet the people that penned Project 2025 were not just random conservatives but in Trump's inner circle and authors are now staffing his administration. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tr...-now-staffing-trump-administration-rcna195107
Claiming ignorance of project 2025 was a flat out lie in my opinion.
No, your advocacy for school choice just makes you wrong
Given how aloof Donald Trump generally is to the finer details of policy, I don’t find it all that hard to believe that he would be unfamiliar with it. He’s at the opposite end of the spectrum of somebody like Adlai Stevenson.
That doesn’t necessarily mean others around him were unfamiliar with it.
Craze, Indiana has been one of the state's leading the way for school choice.
What grade would you give Indiana in improving its education up to now?
No, they absolutely do. And the checkups pay attention to recommended care protocols. For a person over 70, this includes checking carefully for prostate health symptoms but NOT doing a PSA test. Why? Because PSA levels for men over 70 do not correlate with cancer, as determined by MANY studies and accepted as fact by the American Cancer Society.
Is this STILL hard to understand, after explaining it 10 times?
Are you saying that declines in cognitive function indicate cancer, or are you diverting the conversation away from the topic here?
He was becoming a mental vegetable. We know that now, and certainly to some extent (maybe a huge extent) it was pooh-poohed or covered up.
But the assertion that it's 100% clear that he covered up a cancer diagnosis is not supported by any facts I have seen.
Cavanaugh was accused of rape too. Like Trump no time , dates, locations corroboration on any. No prosecutions. However there was zero interest in investigating the Tara Reid even though reports and specifics were filed at the time of the incident unlike Carroll twenty or thirty years later.
no prosecutions may have something to do with Trump being president and not able to be charged. Might also have to do with statute of limitations or the women not wanting to be harassed/threatened by MAGA supporters.
Trump is on video bragging of sexual assault and wandering around dressing rooms uninvited. While that isn't rape, it does point to someone being a predator. 20 women is a lot of people you claim are lying just so you can think trump is innocent.
If trump didn't enjoy immunity as president during his 1st term, then how safe do you think he would have been during the "me too" movement? He may have shared a cell with Cosby.
Last edited:
That’s the sort of question I’d have to defer to the parents who have participated.
No, that's just when the me too movement happened and a lot of women came out about being raped. I don't know when the over 20 women claimed they were raped
Here's an article going through a lot of the accusations of sexual assault - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...nald-trump-women-who-accuse-sexual-misconduct
Last edited:
This is the same party that wheeled out Jimmy Carter corpse to say he was voting for Harris.. ha
Just wait for the Dr. Drew does not know what he is talking about posts to start. You know it is coming.
That's very kind of you, but I don't think of myself as a prophet.
Doesn't surprise me. I remember the show he did with Adam Corolla and that had to have been 25 or so years ago.
I saw him on a show a few weeks ago and he was saying he has practiced medicine for over 40 years so I figured he was like 65 but he does not really look it.
He does not say what people here are saying, though, that it's 100% certain there was a cover-up going on for years.
He seems to be fully correct in describing the typical situation.
But there are outliers and they aren't exactly rare.
1 in 7 patients with prostate cancer (14%) have metastatic disease at the time of first diagnosis*. They have likely had it for a long time, were asymptomatic, and had either normal PSA levels or a PSA test wasn't done because they were low risk and over 70. Many other oncologists on TV have said this.
* citation: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557495/
Dr. Drew is always showing up in ads for me on Youtube about how to lose weight. Dude looks shredded.
i really do feel like we grew up in a good time with the 80s and the 90s. much better than now. and i think there are certain times post ww2 that would have even been better. love line was entertaining. adam carolla was incredibly funny back then
Eating cheetos telling me I can get six pack abs
This is probably your most stupid post ever! And that says a lot.
You “know” what you can’t possibly know given publicly available information.
Latest posts
-
Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure.- Latest: The Original Happy Goat
-
-
-
-
