I noticed he isn't listed on the roster page on iuhoosiers.com but I don't recall news of him leaving. maybe they are only listing those here for spring ball.
Last edited:
I noticed he isn't listed on the roster page on iuhoosiers.com but I don't recall news of him leaving. maybe they are only listing those here for spring ball.
That's the one thing that gives me some pause with CCC. I really think he's going to do well here and if he wins say 7-9 games this year or next...I could see a hungry SEC school pulling up the Brinks truck to his house. I know we can probably match the pay...but will our relative lack of other resources cost us? We'll see, but a good problem to have nonetheless.I hope CCC kills it and decides there are no more mountains to climb, cuz if he wins here the suitor list will be long. He has an ego that may not allow him to be content. He’s 62 going on 63, plenty of time for new challenges if he so chooses.
I'd love for Indiana FB to be in that position. My gut tells me he will be successful & will stay.I hope CCC kills it and decides there are no more mountains to climb, cuz if he wins here the suitor list will be long. He has an ego that may not allow him to be content. He’s 62 going on 63, plenty of time for new challenges if he so chooses.
There would be no more meaningful HC accomplishment than to take a school with the all time worst record to the top of the conference. If he does that, the money from IU/alumni will come. For now, I like our odds.I hope CCC kills it and decides there are no more mountains to climb, cuz if he wins here the suitor list will be long. He has an ego that may not allow him to be content. He’s 62 going on 63, plenty of time for new challenges if he so chooses.
I get what ur saying, and I hope ur right. Some of these guys have egos that won’t let them be content; there is always another hill to climb, and IU is not the pinnacle of college football coaching. Just the opposite actually.There would be no more meaningful HC accomplishment than to take a school with the all time worst record to the top of the conference. If he does that, the money from IU/alumni will come. For now, I like our odds.
Cignetti has a VERY short window to leverage success at Indiana to a bigger job. Common sense tells me he's got roughly a two year window at most to parlay a couple of winning seasons at Indiana into greener pastures.
Indiana is in a situation with the conference mergers and landscape in general that if Cignetti has success and is approached, they'll absolutely have to match most big offers....If they don't, it could lead to their ultimate downfall of getting booted from the conference.
i don't think athletic departments care how much they spend.Cigs buyout after year 2 is 17 million.
A team is really gonna to want a then 64 year old coach to pay that kind of coin, no matter the level that he's winning at.
I think he's here until either a) he retires or b) gets fired.
i don't think athletic departments care how much they spend.
The people hiring and firing coaches are graded by performance.. not by how much money they burn through doing it.
You may be right but it won't be the buyout stopping other teams.
Notice I tied in his age to the buyout.
I get that and agreed age is a factor. I'm just saying the buyout number was immaterial.
It's really not though when someone could get a (potentially) similar coach at a younger age that might not have as big of a buyout.
If the coach was similar and younger, then wouldn't they go after that coach regardless of buyout?
You're making the case for why a 17 million dollar buyout would be a reason to stay away from a 64 year old coach.
No, I said they would go with the younger coach if they felt both were similar. That is based completely on age and not buyout.
So you think a power 5 school that is going to be in the market for giving Cigs a pay raise (i don't see cigs leaving for a pay cut) would care about the buyout if Cigs was their top choice?
I am saying that among the P5 schools that could afford to take Cigs at his salary won't care at all about his buyout.
I'm saying in this scenario where Cigs is performing well, age is the only thing that matters to any school that can afford to take him from us. BUYOUT DOESN'T MATTER.I'm saying its highly unlikely a school is going to pay his buyout when he's already of older age when there are gonna be younger, cheaper options when it's all said and done.
I'll ask you this, is school more likely to go after him if he has a 5 million buyout or a 17 million buyout at his age?
I think that’s right. Looking at our TV $ increase we could pay Cig $10M if we wanted. But the infrastructure/history of other schools can obviously level up the NIL and player talent potential beyond what we could do.That's the one thing that gives me some pause with CCC. I really think he's going to do well here and if he wins say 7-9 games this year or next...I could see a hungry SEC school pulling up the Brinks truck to his house. I know we can probably match the pay...but will our relative lack of other resources cost us? We'll see, but a good problem to have nonetheless.
Buyout after year 2 for the school is $14 million ($17 million is on or after Nov 30th 2025, realistically both Indiana and another school would wait until after this date since it's one day after the season would end). However, that's for Indiana buying out Cignetti. Coach Cig's buyout, and what the hiring school would pay, is only $4 million for a buyout occurring between Dec 1st 2025 and Nov 30th 2026.Cigs buyout after year 2 is 17 million.
A team is really gonna to want a then 64 year old coach to pay that kind of coin, no matter the level that he's winning at.
I think he's here until either a) he retires or b) gets fired.
Where have I heard that before about the quarterback room and the running back room?This QB room will be pretty sweet for a couple years. May shakeup then once there's one man standing .
Not counting out any of the guys on the roster, but bringing in an experienced guy, plus a couple frosh who really look like they can play. Nice. I like both Cherry and Mendoza's high school film.
Not sure where you heard it before. Elaborate?Where have I heard that before about the quarterback room and the running back room?
We have a coaches on offense that know what they are doing and the OL is going to be good with Bostad coaching now. Also we have coaches that don't say the OL has to lose weight but instead they work hard in lifting.Where have I heard that before about the quarterback room and the running back room?
our offense should be good. the defense is the big ?We have a coaches on offense that know what they are doing and the OL is going to be good with Bostad coaching now. Also we have coaches that don't say the OL has to lose weight but instead they work hard in lifting.
You have just shown you are negative no matter who the coaches are.
Agree with your post, but we're not getting kicked out of the conference.Cignetti has a VERY short window to leverage success at Indiana to a bigger job. Common sense tells me he's got roughly a two year window at most to parlay a couple of winning seasons at Indiana into greener pastures.
Indiana is in a situation with the conference mergers and landscape in general that if Cignetti has success and is approached, they'll absolutely have to match most big offers....If they don't, it could lead to their ultimate downfall of getting booted from the conference.
Yeah, unless we get some studs in the portal, our Defense has the potential to be awful next year. Unless our Defensive coaches are geniuses.our offense should be good. the defense is the big ?
I don't doubt they will put a better defense on the field than we have seen in a few years as B1G teams figured out coach Allen's defense. It will be nice to see the front playing a different way.Yeah, unless we get some studs in the portal, our Defense has the potential to be awful next year. Unless our Defensive coaches are geniuses.
Which makes PSU’s hire all the more interesting… what defense is Allen expect red to install this spring?I don't doubt they will put a better defense on the field than we have seen in a few years as B1G teams figured out coach Allen's defense. It will be nice to see the front playing a different way.
I hope you're rightI don't doubt they will put a better defense on the field than we have seen in a few years as B1G teams figured out coach Allen's defense. It will be nice to see the front playing a different way.
I don't think it has anything to do with figuring it out and everything to do with personnel and coaching/recruiting.Which makes PSU’s hire all the more interesting… what defense is Allen expect red to install this spring?
Penn State press suggests it will be his patented scheme as there will be a ‘Bull’.I don't think it has anything to do with figuring it out and everything to do with personnel and coaching/recruiting.
We had some studs on the Dline in Allen's first few years here. I think our recruiting dropped off in that area and our Defense wasn't the same after Wommack left.
Am I dreaming, or did JMU also run a 4-2-5, with 'Stinger' instead of whatever that hybrid LB/DB we used (can't remember the name of it)?Penn State press suggests it will be his patented scheme as there will be a ‘Bull’.
They ran an attacking gap defense up front in the 4-2-5 so I expect a defense more like Womack ran.Am I dreaming, or did JMU also run a 4-2-5, with 'Stinger' instead of whatever that hybrid LB/DB we used (can't remember the name of it)?
So I just googled it. Preseason 2021 article talked about Indiana having perhaps the deepest quarterback room in program history. Very easy to find similar articles about the running back room.Not sure where you heard it before. Elaborate?
The one thing our QB room has this year that it's lacked in the past is a proven veteran at the position. The other 3 are unknowns, except for Tayven, but the kid from Ohio U is legit.You live with what you got. Right now what IUFB has is a QB roster that appears more positive than the last 2 seasons. Agreed come late Summer it could have less luster. But right now it looks optimistic with a staff better skilled to develop it.
Yes, I thought the past two years we needed to attack gaps more than we had.They ran an attacking gap defense up front in the 4-2-5 so I expect a defense more like Womack ran.
The left DE was called Bull and played a stand up style edge. The next guy to his left (#0, Noah Pierre) was called Husky. Huskies are a combo “in the box (walked up) strong safety/LB“ … and slot corner.Am I dreaming, or did JMU also run a 4-2-5, with 'Stinger' instead of whatever that hybrid LB/DB we used (can't remember the name of it)?