Chill..
this team has a chance to be pretty damn good.
truth.
this team has a chance to be pretty damn good.
truth.
A positive post? The Negative Nancy’s will surely smirk at such a thing. I mean who wants a 9-1 record.....Chill..
this team has a chance to be pretty damn good.
truth.
The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0A positive post? The Negative Nancy’s will surely smirk at such a thing. I mean who wants a 9-1 record.....
The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
I don't care about your quads, we should have won that game!First, the real record is 9-1. The committee will look at the entire body of work come selection Sunday.
Second, I guess Maryland should also be 2-0, but guess what, winning in the BIG on the road is hard. End of the day, losing in Wisconsin is a quad 1 loss.
I'll give them 2-1. FSU and UConn are both legit wins. The other wins were fluff filler to pad the record.The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
I wouldn't bank on that, it will still require quality wins regardless of 50-50If they go ,500 the rest of the season their going dancing...
I wouldn't bank on that, it will still require quality wins regardless of 50-50
I don't care about your quads, we should have won that game!
12-1 (1-1) going into January. Already having wins against UCONN, FSU (ARK and ND to come), you can possibly even throw in LA Tech as an ok win. .500 in B1G play, don't care how you cut it would put us at 21 wins....we get in 100 out of 100 times
We’d likely be in, but I’d be disappointed with a .500 conference record.
I have always thought 10-10 in conference but that should be good enough to get in.Not saying I'll be happy with it, but I'm a real realist. I know there are flaws. The B1G is stacked, I think we go 11-9 in conference and finish at 22 wins. That probably puts us as 5th or 6th in conference.
B1G wins are Quality wins!I wouldn't bank on that, it will still require quality wins regardless of 50-50
Duke and UK shouldn't have a loss either. Should both coaches be dismissed? Parity is everywhere in 2019. One game means nothing in the grand schem .The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
12-1 (1-1) going into January. Already having wins against UCONN, FSU (ARK and ND to come), you can possibly even throw in LA Tech as an ok win. .500 in B1G play, don't care how you cut it would put us at 21 wins....we get in 100 out of 100 times
I had IU predicted at 11-9 before the season, but with that terrible loss at Wisconsin, I think they now need to gain an early road win in conference to prevent from falling a bit, and it makes the Nebraska game at home a MUST win,
If that is the criteria, I’d argue 3-1The real record is 1-1 against any real competition, and should be 2-0
You are an expert on blowing...UCONN blows will not even be on the NIT bubble
Another newbie troll. What was your previous name?UCONN blows will not even be on the NIT bubble
I don't know about that, I know the bar has been lowered and favors the blue bloods, but I also remember a Carolina team scraping in at like 20 wins with an OK schedule several years ago and there was a major bitch fest about it. 22-24 wins, yeah we're safe there, but we also need quality wins to not draw some tough as mid-major in the 1st round and get embarrassed. This team ain't doing anything, but could use that experience and confidence boost of a couple tourney wins12-1 (1-1) going into January. Already having wins against UCONN, FSU (ARK and ND to come), you can possibly even throw in LA Tech as an ok win. .500 in B1G play, don't care how you cut it would put us at 21 wins....we get in 100 out of 100 times