ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t like Trump but I like his policies”

82hoosier

Hall of Famer
Sep 7, 2001
10,046
8,850
113
How is that rationale looking now? I don’t know which is worse in Washington politics right now: Greed or ineptness. This is what happens when both parties back presidential candidates with dementia.
 
Last edited:
How is that rational looking now? I don’t know what is worse in Washington right now: Greed or ineptness. This is what happens when both parties back presidential candidates with dementia.



The parties are broken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NPT
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone. Who knows what destruction will be left

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due…. We need a leader…. We need a hero
 
Last edited:
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone.

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due….

chuck norris approved GIF
 
  • Love
Reactions: JamieDimonsBalls
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone. Who knows what destruction will be left

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due…. We need a leader
We've got one:

Rafa J. Conde


 
  • Haha
Reactions: JamieDimonsBalls
We've got one:

Rafa J. Conde


🐐
 
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone. Who knows what destruction will be left

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due…. We need a leader…. We need a hero
We need Shapiro with Fetterman as VP.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone. Who knows what destruction will be left

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due…. We need a leader…. We need a hero
Most likely will never happen. Third parties lack almost everything needed to win an election. You would have to get the nomination of one of the parties to do it. RFK had decent blue collar appeal and he could not even top 10%.
 
We've got one:

Rafa J. Conde


"Rafa J Conde is a multifaceted force to be reckoned with, boasting an impressive portfolio of achievements. At his core, he is a devoted father, husband, and man of God, with a strong background as an ex-DEA/Narcotics/SWAT officer, entrepreneur, best-selling author, and highly sought-after consultant and public speaker. As the founder and CEO of Man of War, Rafa is a leading industry expert in leadership, creating fanatical culture, the warrior archetype, building elite brotherhoods, and designing physically and psychologically demanding events."
 
  • Love
Reactions: BradStevens
No chance. Sadly. Left is leaning into progressives. AOC is the party
I don't think AOC will ever run for president and if she did, I don't think she'd come close to getting out of the primaries. It's frustrating that more sensible Democrats haven't stepped up - people we've all talked about here before are more than capable of winning in '28 - but unfortunately to date no one is stepping up and AOC and Bernie are filling a void. Them getting big crowds at rallies makes for nice Trump opposition optics, but that's not sustainable.

I'm just spitballing here, but maybe that void is strategic. '28 is still a long way away, relatively speaking and a lot still could change. Maybe party leadership wants to see how the midterms go before rolling out the 'grown-up' presidential hopefuls.
 
I don't think AOC will ever run for president and if she did, I don't think she'd come close to getting out of the primaries. It's frustrating that more sensible Democrats haven't stepped up - people we've all talked about here before are more than capable of winning in '28 - but unfortunately to date no one is stepping up and AOC and Bernie are filling a void. Them getting big crowds at rallies makes for nice Trump opposition optics, but that's not sustainable.

I'm just spitballing here, but maybe that void is strategic. '28 is still a long way away, relatively speaking and a lot still could change. Maybe party leadership wants to see how the midterms go before rolling out the 'grown-up' presidential hopefuls.
i don't think so. i think the party is progressive and if it's not aoc it's a walz/harris or some other progressive. the young people are pushing out the old. There’s a reason Biden went crazy woke and the replacements were Harris walz. That is the party

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DANC and jet812
I don't think she's eligible. But a great cabinet selection. If you do not pick her, you are gay.

Once again, that lady is the poster girl for the “Hot/Crazy Matrix”.

I know some people here didn’t think she was all that hot. I beg to differ.

But, man, does she ruin it all when she starts talking, or emoting…or whipping out flammenwerfers.
 
What's the take on Cory Booker? Seems more pragmatic than most. He gets criticised by the progressive wing as not being progressive enough and by the right as being an Obama liberal. Enough in the middle ground to be a contender?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
What's the take on Cory Booker? Seems more pragmatic than most. He gets criticised by the progressive wing as not being progressive enough and by the right as being an Obama liberal. Enough in the middle ground to be a contender?

He’s tried it once. And it wasn’t very successful.

Seems obvious that both parties would want to nominate candidates who will be competitive in the battleground states.

That’s why I thought the Dems would’ve been money ahead to cut bait with Harris and pave the way for either Shapiro or Whitmer to get the nomination.
 
You can continue saying that but it doesn't make it true.

And just because you don't like it, doesn't make it false.


From the article...

A CNN poll carried out from March 6 to 9 showed that Ocasio-Cortez was the top politician among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents when asked which "one person best reflects the core values" of the party.

The New York progressive was named by 10 percent of respondents. That was narrowly ahead of former Vice President Kamala Harris, who was named by 9 percent. Sanders came in third, with 8 percent. The survey included 1,206 U.S. adults with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.3 percent.

AOC, Kamala and Bernie best reflect the Dem's core values...that is a turdrific trifecta of progressivism right there.
 
What's the take on Cory Booker? Seems more pragmatic than most. He gets criticised by the progressive wing as not being progressive enough and by the right as being an Obama liberal. Enough in the middle ground to be a contender?
I could get behind him. There seems to be some distance between him and the more far-left part of the party. I kind of thought his marathon senate speech might be a first step toward testing the Democratic primary waters, but wasn't sure. He definitely seems like someone on both sides of the aisle can and do take seriously.

Bluntly, I think Republicans would get some traction attacking him as a black, single, east coast liberal. He'd have to have someone like Gretchen Whitmer or Andy Beshear as his VP. Or maybe one of those two could have the rolls reversed.
 
That reflects name recognition, nothing more.
And as I mentioned above, I think some of the more moderate or 'serious' candidates aren't emerging yet. Guys like Andy Beshear and Josh Shapiro are showing up on podcasts and other types of shows, but they're not planting any presidential candidate flags just yet.

If things are still going the way they are now for the Republicans, I have to think post midterms is when we see things start to happen for more moderate Democrats.
 
For every person who makes a thoughtful, well reasoned and researched voting decision at least one (probably more) drop a straight ticket ballot or vote for a person for superficial reasons.
I think that's true, but it's hard to say who will be in the Democratic primaries, let alone win them. 120 or so days into Obama's second term no one would have thought the '16 Republican primaries would have gone they way they did.

My hunch is that timing is everything here. Let's see what happens around or after the midterms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowlmania
Democratic brand is “toxic.” Doubling down on AOC and woke betas

Trump will mercifully be gone. Who knows what destruction will be left

We need a hero to emerge to save us from these two parties

I believe it needs to come from outside the parties to break the grip. Last hero this country produced imo was kimbo slice

We’re due…. We need a leader…. We need a hero
I'm holding out for a hero 'til the end of the night
He's gotta be strong, and he's gotta be fast
And he's gotta be fresh from the fight.
 
except it is true. unequivocally true. substitute aoc for walz, harris, stay at home pete, newsom, it's all the same. biden went woke. who was biden's replacement. the two wokest candidates out there in walz and harris. the left is a party of progressives now. and they hate you #dieboomers

Dennis Kucinich was always out front and one of the first people to announce a run for the presidency. He was fairly popular with stops on MSNBC shows and Bill Maher. Once things shook out, he very rarely had a legitimate chance at being the Democratic nominee. AOC is getting bigger crowds than Kucinich could have ever dreamed about, but I think their fate in terms of presidential politics is mostly the same.

She'll be a voice in the Democratic party - and that's not insignificant - but she's not a leader of the party. I'm honestly not even sure she actually wants to be. I think she'd be happy playing the role she is now for the next couple of decades.

And Harris was never the consensus pick and isn't really a leader in Democratic politics. She was the Mike Davis of Democratic Presidential hopefuls. When it was clear Biden wouldn't be able to run, Democrats shrugged, looked around and said, welp, she's here...might as go with her.
 
He's as pragmatic and "middle ground" as you were a conservative

46mtLob.png
The variable here is how much of a f*#k up Trump is the rest of this term. If things keep going the way they are now or things get worse, Cory Booker would present as pretty damned pragmatic. Especially with the right VP.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
The variable here is how much of a f*#k up Trump is the rest of this term. If things keep going the way they are now or things get worse, Cory Booker would present as pretty damned pragmatic. Especially with the right VP.

You are just comparing him against the most impragmatic President in history. Maybe people would see it that way after four years of this drama.

But, liberals don't seem to get the message. You lost because of who you ran, not because Trump was better this time than in 2020. Booker is clearly a far-left liberal (in the same part of the graph as Liz Warren). If you think that is what is going to win, I don't know how to help you.

Just run a moderate, sensible candidate. Of course, I could say the same about the GOP. Both parties have let down this country and deserve to be broken up.
 
And Harris was never the consensus pick and isn't really a leader in Democratic politics. She was the Mike Davis of Democratic Presidential hopefuls. When it was clear Biden wouldn't be able to run, Democrats shrugged, looked around and said, welp, she's here...might as go with her.

Yeah, Harris was a fait accompli once Biden gave it up.

Pragmatic left center Democrats rejected Bernie in 2016 and Bernie/Warren/Harris et. al in 2020. Biden screwed the pooch when he embraced the progressive left identity politics in the name of party unity.
 
Dennis Kucinich was always out front and one of the first people to announce a run for the presidency. He was fairly popular with stops on MSNBC shows and Bill Maher. Once things shook out, he very rarely had a legitimate chance at being the Democratic nominee. AOC is getting bigger crowds than Kucinich could have ever dreamed about, but I think their fate in terms of presidential politics is mostly the same.

She'll be a voice in the Democratic party - and that's not insignificant - but she's not a leader of the party. I'm honestly not even sure she actually wants to be. I think she'd be happy playing the role she is now for the next couple of decades.

And Harris was never the consensus pick and isn't really a leader in Democratic politics. She was the Mike Davis of Democratic Presidential hopefuls. When it was clear Biden wouldn't be able to run, Democrats shrugged, looked around and said, welp, she's here...might as go with her.
When I mean leader I mean her politics. Far left progressive. Substitute her for Harris. Pete. Walz. Newsom. Doesn’t matter. This isn’t 2016. Progressives are the party
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT