ADVERTISEMENT

If you are Scott Dolson…

Yes, but there a lot of problems other than shooting in terms of motivation, discipline, composure/attitude, and fundamentals. Shooting better would get us no further than average.
Agree, didn't really mean just that. I'm saying a "coach in waiting" could be tasked with improving shooting, and other fundamentals as well. We'd probably have 4-5 more wins with just some moderate improvement in those areas.
 
The issue is - do we want this? Calipari 2.0. At least they win some big games.

A losing program with NBA stars? Woohoo!!
When Calipari was competing for NCs, he was getting 3 of the top 8/9 each year. When he got to the point where he was only getting fewer than that he has not been competitive for the NC.
 
Dolson is in a tough spot.

Everything I think he needs to be doing, right now, should involve discussions with the President and the BOT. Buckner's presence on the BOT potentially throws a huge wrench in that.

What's needed is for Dolson to call a meeting with the President, Buckner, and himself. And I lay out a vision for what IU basketball can, and should be. And assuming its already talked with Woody about all this, multiple times...something needs laid out, bullet point by bullet point, how Woody aligns with the vision for the program. And assuming that for most of the bullet points he doesn't fit, it should conclude with the formal request to fire him at seasons end.

Practically, he has to get Buckner on board with this. And the risk to Dolson is that if Buckner isn't on board with this, and he makes a move like this, it could end up costing Dolson his own job. But if Dolson believes its the right thing to do, then he has to have the fortitude to do it now.

The Buckner dynamic, and him being done next year, leads me to believe Dolson will kick the can down the road another year. Its what most AD's in his position would do. And I'm not naïve enough to say I wouldn't do the same thing, for personal job preservation.

Dolson has shown the willingness to move on coaches before contracts are up. He's shown the chops to get the required funding to get that done. Dolson made the move on Archie, with going hard after Stevens as one of his first moves. Woody wasn't his top choice, evidently...so I doubt Dolson himself views him all that favorably at this point...obviously could be wrong on that, its just a guess. But an educated one, I think, with how the hire went, and then how the Matta/Fife experiment went... Woody's buyout isn't a problem, in the big scheme of things. But his relationship with Buckner is a problem...if Buckner still believes in him and wants him to remain the coach.

So if I'm Dolson, and I'm being honest and realistic, I spend the next 4-5 months actively pushing Woody to change his program, change his staff, etc... With hopes that he will, and that it translates to a better season next year. We don't need to win a national title any time soon, we just need to start playing good basketball again.

If I'm my best version of Dolson, the one with huge balls and tons of fortitude...I have the meetings right now with Buckner and the President, and I push hard to make a coaching change after this season.
How can you have a meeting with the President and Buckner without Woodson being present? Not going to happen and only bad things would ensure if it did.
 
Dolson is in a tough spot.

Everything I think he needs to be doing, right now, should involve discussions with the President and the BOT. Buckner's presence on the BOT potentially throws a huge wrench in that.

What's needed is for Dolson to call a meeting with the President, Buckner, and himself. And I lay out a vision for what IU basketball can, and should be. And assuming its already talked with Woody about all this, multiple times...something needs laid out, bullet point by bullet point, how Woody aligns with the vision for the program. And assuming that for most of the bullet points he doesn't fit, it should conclude with the formal request to fire him at seasons end.

Practically, he has to get Buckner on board with this. And the risk to Dolson is that if Buckner isn't on board with this, and he makes a move like this, it could end up costing Dolson his own job. But if Dolson believes its the right thing to do, then he has to have the fortitude to do it now.

The Buckner dynamic, and him being done next year, leads me to believe Dolson will kick the can down the road another year. Its what most AD's in his position would do. And I'm not naïve enough to say I wouldn't do the same thing, for personal job preservation.

Dolson has shown the willingness to move on coaches before contracts are up. He's shown the chops to get the required funding to get that done. Dolson made the move on Archie, with going hard after Stevens as one of his first moves. Woody wasn't his top choice, evidently...so I doubt Dolson himself views him all that favorably at this point...obviously could be wrong on that, its just a guess. But an educated one, I think, with how the hire went, and then how the Matta/Fife experiment went... Woody's buyout isn't a problem, in the big scheme of things. But his relationship with Buckner is a problem...if Buckner still believes in him and wants him to remain the coach.

So if I'm Dolson, and I'm being honest and realistic, I spend the next 4-5 months actively pushing Woody to change his program, change his staff, etc... With hopes that he will, and that it translates to a better season next year. We don't need to win a national title any time soon, we just need to start playing good basketball again.

If I'm my best version of Dolson, the one with huge balls and tons of fortitude...I have the meetings right now with Buckner and the President, and I push hard to make a coaching change after this season.
What makes you think Dolson and especially quinn think anything in wrong with the program right now? They probably think it is great we made the tourney the last two years and this is simply a down year due to injuries. Honestly I bet that is how they think.
 
When Calipari was competing for NCs, he was getting 3 of the top 8/9 each year. When he got to the point where he was only getting fewer than that he has not been competitive for the NC.
What’s your point?

As you said, it’s not sustainable. And, with all that talent he got one championship 12 years ago. Again, woohoo! And no thanks!
 
What’s your point?

As you said, it’s not sustainable. And, with all that talent he got one championship 12 years ago. Again, woohoo! And no thanks!
I don't think anyone expects a Calipari to be in Bloomington. The point is....on balance, UK has been successful...rarely misses the big dance...and has a Natty that today's players can actually see in their lifetime. Not to mention...they are in every high profile preseason tournament...on marquis TV games...etc. If IU were where they are right now, program-wise....I would take it over the status quo. IU needs its own high powered coach. We haven't had that guy since RMK... a quarter of a century ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBT Assoc
What makes you think Dolson and especially quinn think anything in wrong with the program right now? They probably think it is great we made the tourney the last two years and this is simply a down year due to injuries. Honestly I bet that is how they think.
I think a lot of people think that. Injuries, and new young players not contributing yet, and misplaced belief that the seniors were leaders. This board does not represent the average IU BB fan.
 
What’s your point?

As you said, it’s not sustainable. And, with all that talent he got one championship 12 years ago. Again, woohoo! And no thanks!
My point is that getting 1 5* a year didn't work for Calipari, and he's a far better coach than Woodson. If you're going all in with recruiting one-and-dones there need to be many and they need to be dominant players......the four we've gotten are all nice players with talent but none are dominant players and none seem to be completely in sync with their less talented teammates.

So we're neither getting dominant 5* like Calipari nor 1/2 5*s like Duke had with Coach K that fit in with the rest of the team.
 
My point is that getting 1 5* a year didn't work for Calipari, and he's a far better coach than Woodson. If you're going all in with recruiting one-and-dones there need to be many and they need to be dominant players......the four we've gotten are all nice players with talent but none are dominant players and none seem to be completely in sync with their less talented teammates.

So we're neither getting dominant 5* like Calipari nor 1/2 5*s like Duke had with Coach K that fit in with the rest of the team.

Looking at those great UK teams......

----2011-12....38-2..Won the NC...3 of the starting 5 were Anthony Davis (#1 NBA pick), Marcus Teague (#29 NBA), and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist (#2)
---2009-10....35-3....John Wall (#1), DeMarcus Cousins (#5) and Eric Bledsoe (#18)...and they didn't win the NC
---2014-15......38-1....Karl-Anthony Towns (#1), Devin Booker (#13), Trey Lyles (#12), and Tyler Ulis (#34) in top 6 players...lost FF game to Wisconsin.

Bottom li8ne....if you're going to make it all about the NBA...which I think Woody has....you better have about 3 real studs.

Ware is a nice player. JHS was a nice player. Neither was anything like Davis, Wall, Cousins, Kidd-Gilchrist or Towns.
 
How can you have a meeting with the President and Buckner without Woodson being present? Not going to happen and only bad things would ensure if it did.
Woodson reports to Dolson. Dolson is free to meet with Pam (who he reports to) and Quinn (Pam reports to BoT). This is typical -- a leadership team discussing an [underperforming] employee. Tom Allen wasn't in the room when they decided to move on from him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victorbmyboy
How can you have a meeting with the President and Buckner without Woodson being present? Not going to happen and only bad things would ensure if it did.
My post indicates that Dolson and Woody would have already had multiple meetings about Dolson's concerns.

The meeting I'm referring to would be because Dolson doesn't see that Woody is on the same page, and is meeting with the proper decision makers to push for a change.

Obviously Dolson needs to have laid out clear expectations, and had multiple follow up meetings to guage results versus expectations...before getting to this step of wanting to make a change.

If he hasn't thought to do that yet...its probably time he initiates those meetings with Woody.
 
Woodson reports to Dolson. Dolson is free to meet with Pam (who he reports to) and Quinn (Pam reports to BoT). This is typical -- a leadership team discussing an [underperforming] employee. Tom Allen wasn't in the room when they decided to move on from him.
And if they don’t then that means it’s dysfunctional.
 
I think a lot of people think that. Injuries, and new young players not contributing yet, and misplaced belief that the seniors were leaders. This board does not represent the average IU BB fan.
Not the fans I know they all think woodson stinks. But that does not matter all that matters is what quinn thinks. Most folks I know do not give a pass because of a misplaced belief they call that a failure of the coach.
 
Whey you look a the guys woodson takes advice form it all makes total sense. None of these guys were winners as coaches.

Wittman .400 winning percentage in the NBA
Quinn .159 winning percentage
Armond Hill .338 winning percentage
Isiah .280 winning percentage in college

On March 10, 2003, two days after Columbia finished with a 2–25 record (0–14 in Ivy League play), the worst season in the school's 103-year basketball history, Hill was fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GThomas
Dolson is in a tough spot.

Everything I think he needs to be doing, right now, should involve discussions with the President and the BOT. Buckner's presence on the BOT potentially throws a huge wrench in that.

What's needed is for Dolson to call a meeting with the President, Buckner, and himself. And I lay out a vision for what IU basketball can, and should be. And assuming its already talked with Woody about all this, multiple times...something needs laid out, bullet point by bullet point, how Woody aligns with the vision for the program. And assuming that for most of the bullet points he doesn't fit, it should conclude with the formal request to fire him at seasons end.

Practically, he has to get Buckner on board with this. And the risk to Dolson is that if Buckner isn't on board with this, and he makes a move like this, it could end up costing Dolson his own job. But if Dolson believes its the right thing to do, then he has to have the fortitude to do it now.

The Buckner dynamic, and him being done next year, leads me to believe Dolson will kick the can down the road another year. Its what most AD's in his position would do. And I'm not naïve enough to say I wouldn't do the same thing, for personal job preservation.

Dolson has shown the willingness to move on coaches before contracts are up. He's shown the chops to get the required funding to get that done. Dolson made the move on Archie, with going hard after Stevens as one of his first moves. Woody wasn't his top choice, evidently...so I doubt Dolson himself views him all that favorably at this point...obviously could be wrong on that, its just a guess. But an educated one, I think, with how the hire went, and then how the Matta/Fife experiment went... Woody's buyout isn't a problem, in the big scheme of things. But his relationship with Buckner is a problem...if Buckner still believes in him and wants him to remain the coach.

So if I'm Dolson, and I'm being honest and realistic, I spend the next 4-5 months actively pushing Woody to change his program, change his staff, etc... With hopes that he will, and that it translates to a better season next year. We don't need to win a national title any time soon, we just need to start playing good basketball again.

If I'm my best version of Dolson, the one with huge balls and tons of fortitude...I have the meetings right now with Buckner and the President, and I push hard to make a coaching change after this season.
The president needs to make the decision without any input from Dolson or Buckner. If it's their call, Woody will be at IU until he looks like the Cryptkeeper.

tales from the crypt 90s GIF by absurdnoise
 
You replace him this year if you're an AD that knows his ass from his elbow.
If I am Scott Dolson and I don't talk Woodson into stepping away from IU, I fire myself for as [dolson] for incompetence. IU with WOODY AT THE HELM NEXT YEAR IS GONNA LOSE MILLIONS IN DONATIONS and have thousands of empty seats.
 
The president needs to make the decision without any input from Dolson or Buckner. If it's their call, Woody will be at IU until he looks like the Cryptkeeper.

tales from the crypt 90s GIF by absurdnoise
Ha, if Pam had enough and demanded results and a coaching change that would be awesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GThomas
Scott will do what Whitten tells him to do, since he reports to her. I believe Whitten was the driver for the FB coaching change, not Dolson and not the Trustees. McRobbie left the AD alone, as long as he didn't have to deal with any scandals he didn't care about athletics. If McRobbie were still President, we'd still have Tom Allen as the coach. Whitten came here from Georgia, and understands what a good football program can mean to a university.

I remain doubtful that Dolson is "taking orders" as such from Buckner. Woodson was a fallback when Stevens declined. Maybe when it was clear that Stevens wasn't coming, Buckner put in a word for Woodson and Dolson didn't have any better options ready.
If it’s true that Woody really wanted the job when Glass hired Miller, I’d assume QB was advocating for Woodson back then too. And when the Miller experiment failed perhaps Buckner dialed up his support for MW to an even higher level.
 
Woodson reports to Dolson. Dolson is free to meet with Pam (who he reports to) and Quinn (Pam reports to BoT). This is typical -- a leadership team discussing an [underperforming] employee. Tom Allen wasn't in the room when they decided to move on from him.
I'm not seeing a physical meeting between SD, Pam & Buckner behind Woodson's back.

I agree with the poster above that Pam W. ought to be the one to push this. She wasn't involved in the original decision and it is less emotionally charged for her.

If she doesn't have the "balls" to initiate the discussion, Dull Son should make the call to her. Buckner shouldn't be brought into until the two are in agreement.
 
Scott will do what Whitten tells him to do, since he reports to her. I believe Whitten was the driver for the FB coaching change, not Dolson and not the Trustees. McRobbie left the AD alone, as long as he didn't have to deal with any scandals he didn't care about athletics. If McRobbie were still President, we'd still have Tom Allen as the coach. Whitten came here from Georgia, and understands what a good football program can mean to a university.

I remain doubtful that Dolson is "taking orders" as such from Buckner. Woodson was a fallback when Stevens declined. Maybe when it was clear that Stevens wasn't coming, Buckner put in a word for Woodson and Dolson didn't have any better options ready.

What evidence do you have that Whitten was the driver?
I would acutally think it was more SD with Whitten's blessing since he moved on Archie when not many thought he would.
 
I’d be surprised if Dolson wanted Woody. We know he wanted Brad, a college coach with a great track record. He hired Cignetti, a long-time college coach with a good track record who brought his staff/connections to try and replicate his process at IU.

Woody is the opposite of what Dolson seems to like in Brad and Cig: an NBA-only guy with no college experience or staff or connections. It’s odd to totally change up your criteria. Seems more likely Quinn, who is powerful on the BoT, pushed for Woody. Dolson wimped out and said okay, he added Matta to try and feel better about the risk of no college experience with Woody.

I have no idea with Pam. She doesn’t say much about sports beyond that she likes them. She doesn’t mention sports in her multi-year strategic plans. That said, if she is driving this, that’s awesome!
 
I'm not seeing a physical meeting between SD, Pam & Buckner behind Woodson's back.

I agree with the poster above that Pam W. ought to be the one to push this. She wasn't involved in the original decision and it is less emotionally charged for her.

If she doesn't have the "balls" to initiate the discussion, Dull Son should make the call to her. Buckner shouldn't be brought into until the two are in agreement.
At the end of the day, Woodson is just another university employee. His superiors will meet and talk about him all the time without him being there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUbball_lifer
I think a lot of people think that. Injuries, and new young players not contributing yet, and misplaced belief that the seniors were leaders. This board does not represent the average IU BB fan.
I doubt what the “average” fan thinks has much effect anyway, but imo it would be naive to assume that donors’ input doesn’t have a substantial effect (especially the ones bankrolling NIL). I expect there is already a good deal of dissatisfaction within that group, and they don’t need a message board to express it.
 
I’d be surprised if Dolson wanted Woody. We know he wanted Brad, a college coach with a great track record. He hired Cignetti, a long-time college coach with a good track record who brought his staff/connections to try and replicate his process at IU.

Woody is the opposite of what Dolson seems to like in Brad and Cig: an NBA-only guy with no college experience or staff or connections. It’s odd to totally change up your criteria. Seems more likely Quinn, who is powerful on the BoT, pushed for Woody. Dolson wimped out and said okay, he added Matta to try and feel better about the risk of no college experience with Woody.

I have no idea with Pam. She doesn’t say much about sports beyond that she likes them. She doesn’t mention sports in her multi-year strategic plans. That said, if she is driving this, that’s awesome!

That seems like a pretty likely scenario.

That coaching search went on for awhile. Dull Son probably panicked when BSs turned him down. Woodson was his lifeboat. But he had enough sense to know the experience of most NBA lifers when they transition to college.....not good. Woodson probably acted like he was genuinely open to the arrangement with Matta and Fife....then he decided A. Hill was the only one that would really have his ear. Rosemond and Hunter would do the recruiting for him so he didn't have to work too hard at it. And his NBA background would give him enough credibility to sign a few studs.....With his NBA background he was more interested in managing players so they knew their roles than truly developing them.
 
At the end of the day, Woodson is just another university employee. His superiors will meet and talk about him all the time without him being there.

No they won't. This would be a process. Either Dull Son or Pam must decide he has to go. Then they would talk to the other and put a bug in the other's ear. Dull Son: "Pam, I'm calling to talk about the men's basketball program. I want to know your thoughts....I'm afraid it hasn't worked out like we thought it would...." If Pam is of any stature she'd initiate the conversation because she wasn't involved in the hire. They'd agree "let's see how things play out". After about a month and a couple of calls back and forth they'd be in agreement and one of them would contact Buckner.

Buckner's not going to stand against both of them if they want him gone. He's not an idiot. He knows it hasn't worked.
 
No they won't. This would be a process. Either Dull Son or Pam must decide he has to go. Then they would talk to the other and put a bug in the other's ear. Dull Son: "Pam, I'm calling to talk about the men's basketball program. I want to know your thoughts....I'm afraid it hasn't worked out like we thought it would...." If Pam is of any stature she'd initiate the conversation because she wasn't involved in the hire. They'd agree "let's see how things play out". After about a month and a couple of calls back and forth they'd be in agreement and one of them would contact Buckner.
If Buckner has any veto power, or if there's any understanding or agreement that the BOT (Buckner) is to be involved in any coaching hiring/firing decisions...then your laid out process could potentially be a huge waste of time, as Buckner would end up having ultimate veto power.

I have no idea what the decision making flow is at IU on these things. It sure seems like Buckner was heavily involved in the Woody hire. Doesn't matter...taking the step of firing someone like Woody, should include the BOT's input and approval.

So here's what the process "should" be.

1. Dolson, I would hope, has laid out some basic framework for his expectations for the program. That should have happened when Woody was hired.

2. After years 1 and 2, they would have sat down and reviewed the seasons, discussed the program, and where its headed.

3. At this point, during THIS season, Dolson ideally would have had at least a couple meetings reviewing the program. Style of play, flagrant fouls, current metrics...all fair game to be discussed as concerns Dolson has. Also dialogue on how Woody plans to fix the current issues, as we only have 1 player signed for next year's class.

4. Assuming Dolson is at a point where he's ready to move on from Woodson...then... he needs to put a meeting together with President and BOT (Buckner), laying out his desire to fire Woodson. He needs to also have a plan and vision for the hire as well at that time.

5. If the Prez and BOTs agree, then that's what happens.

6. If either/both disagree...then Dolson has to pivot, establish the vision for what he believes IU basketball is to be, and then reestablishes those expectations with Woody. Knowing Buckner likely has already talked with Woody about Dolson's meeting and desire to fire him. Buckner could either play the role of "snake in the woodpile" and commiserate with Woody. Or he could work to convince Woody that he needs to be open to changing his style and plans, and adopt what Dolson is wanting him to do. "I put my neck out there to get you hired...you owe me the effort to change and keep your job." Either way, its all out there, and the clock is officially ticking for Woody.

The only thing that gives me pause on all this...Dolson thought enough of Woody in this past offseason, to give him that raise. That opens up the possibility that he was excited and on board with where Woody was taking the program before his season started. And thus probably pushes Dolson's clock back on coming to any sort of conclusion that termination is necessary. So at this point, he'd probably just be opening up conversations with concerns in them. Hard to jump all the way from initial concerns in say...January...to an all out firing in March.

Lots of factors leading to the likelihood that Woody is back next year. I just hope there have been some hard conversations if so, and that Woody takes them seriously and works to change. If we only lose a few guys, and bring in McNeely, and a couple good guards...and Woody is open to using those guys differently. We could turn the ship back in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bucket Getter
The $1M raise is the one thing that doesn't quite fit the Quinn pushed Woody narrative. In August Dolson thought things were great when there was a lot of uncertainty as to how things would break. Scares me.

It takes a lot to get booted in Yr 3, we'll see if being ranked #100 and being embarrassed all season is enough. Whatever IU does, we'll probably mess it up lol.
 
Agree, didn't really mean just that. I'm saying a "coach in waiting" could be tasked with improving shooting, and other fundamentals as well. We'd probably have 4-5 more wins with just some moderate improvement in those areas.
It's hard for me to believe there are any better shooters anywhere better than Calbert, Jordy, Wittman, and even Woody himself. I have no idea about the 3 real assistants or the other dude.
 
If Buckner has any veto power, or if there's any understanding or agreement that the BOT (Buckner) is to be involved in any coaching hiring/firing decisions...then your laid out process could potentially be a huge waste of time, as Buckner would end up having ultimate veto power.

I have no idea what the decision making flow is at IU on these things. It sure seems like Buckner was heavily involved in the Woody hire. Doesn't matter...taking the step of firing someone like Woody, should include the BOT's input and approval.

So here's what the process "should" be.

1. Dolson, I would hope, has laid out some basic framework for his expectations for the program. That should have happened when Woody was hired.

2. After years 1 and 2, they would have sat down and reviewed the seasons, discussed the program, and where its headed.

3. At this point, during THIS season, Dolson ideally would have had at least a couple meetings reviewing the program. Style of play, flagrant fouls, current metrics...all fair game to be discussed as concerns Dolson has. Also dialogue on how Woody plans to fix the current issues, as we only have 1 player signed for next year's class.

4. Assuming Dolson is at a point where he's ready to move on from Woodson...then... he needs to put a meeting together with President and BOT (Buckner), laying out his desire to fire Woodson. He needs to also have a plan and vision for the hire as well at that time.

5. If the Prez and BOTs agree, then that's what happens.

6. If either/both disagree...then Dolson has to pivot, establish the vision for what he believes IU basketball is to be, and then reestablishes those expectations with Woody. Knowing Buckner likely has already talked with Woody about Dolson's meeting and desire to fire him. Buckner could either play the role of "snake in the woodpile" and commiserate with Woody. Or he could work to convince Woody that he needs to be open to changing his style and plans, and adopt what Dolson is wanting him to do. "I put my neck out there to get you hired...you owe me the effort to change and keep your job." Either way, its all out there, and the clock is officially ticking for Woody.

The only thing that gives me pause on all this...Dolson thought enough of Woody in this past offseason, to give him that raise. That opens up the possibility that he was excited and on board with where Woody was taking the program before his season started. And thus probably pushes Dolson's clock back on coming to any sort of conclusion that termination is necessary. So at this point, he'd probably just be opening up conversations with concerns in them. Hard to jump all the way from initial concerns in say...January...to an all out firing in March.

Lots of factors leading to the likelihood that Woody is back next year. I just hope there have been some hard conversations if so, and that Woody takes them seriously and works to change. If we only lose a few guys, and bring in McNeely, and a couple good guards...and Woody is open to using those guys differently. We could turn the ship back in the right direction.
Well reasoned as usual. Thank you. But I have serious reservations about Woody's ability to change. When forced to agree to "change his style", I just don't think that's realistic. The guy is 65 and has been doing things his way for a looooong time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indymoon
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT