Actually it isn’t. Two different fields of litigation.
So, one is regulation by litigation while the other is regulation by litigation? That totally clears it up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually it isn’t. Two different fields of litigation.
So, one is regulation by litigation while the other is regulation by litigation? That totally clears it up.
Nuance isn’t your strength.
One is regulation through deliberate bureaucratic actions encouraging special interests to accomplish ends by court order instead of rule-making.
The other is altering commercial behavior by connecting risk to profit.
Nuance isn’t your strength.
One is regulation through deliberate bureaucratic actions encouraging special interests to accomplish ends by court order instead of rule-making.
The other is altering commercial behavior by connecting risk to profit.
He's like Key and Peele Obama Anger Translator only Trump's Brain Translator.You are truly the Trump Whisperer -- Trump Rastafarian. Trumpstafarian
You can see moves/nuances that nobody else can see including Trump himself.
This is Trump's brain but somehow you can make sense of it:
I salute you my friend.
He's like Key and Peele Obama Anger Translator only Trump's Brain Translator.
I don't believe the paragraph below, but it is a fun Machiavellian theory.
Gun sales have been way down and gun manufacturers are hurting economically. Part of the reason was a big surge in production expecting an increase in "Hillary is coming to get your guns" sales events across the country. Not only did the increase not happen, last year saw a decrease in FBI background checks of 8%, indicating fewer gun sales. So if you want a conspiracy theory, Trump saying those things is done to boost sales and help gun manufacturers survive.
Nuance isn’t your strength.
I swear, @CO. Hoosier must have some word of the day calendar, because he constantly obsesses over some specific word for months at a time. Nothingburger, nuance, etc.Communication isn't yours.
You are truly the Trump Whisperer -- Trump Rastafarian. Trumpstafarian
You can see moves/nuances that nobody else can see including Trump himself.
This is Trump's brain but somehow you can make sense of it:
I salute you my friend.
In other words, he hasn't accomplished anything that 12+ other Republican candidates would have accomplished. And he should be lauded because he's managed to quietly pass this agenda, under everyone's nose, by: ignoring historic norms, attacking American institutions that rely on people's confidence, destroying everyone's career that comes in contact with his administration, violating our Constitution, and most likely colluding with our biggest adversary of the past 100 years.Regulatory reform on some Important fronts. Ridding ourselves of regulation by litigation and ridding ourselves of regulatory minutiae. This has resulted in the booming energy sector booming bigly and infrastructure construction and department of interior being freed from some of the constant and incessant litigation.
Immigration enforcement.
Energy exports.
Military funding
Change of ROE in ME and getting White House out of day to day military affairs which helped eliminate ISIS geographical base.
Bringing some common sense to health insurance for the young and healthy.
And tax reform—not a minor item by any means.
I swear, @CO. Hoosier must have some word of the day calendar, because he constantly obsesses over some specific word for months at a time. Nothingburger, nuance, etc.
Repeating “nuance” 500 times doesn’t make you sound any more intelligent.
Not recognizing the important distinctions and nuances in various arguments causes you to post nothingburgers.
I swear, @CO. Hoosier must have some word of the day calendar, because he constantly obsesses over some specific word for months at a time. Nothingburger, nuance, etc.
Repeating “nuance” 500 times doesn’t make you sound any more intelligent.
In other words, he hasn't accomplished anything that 12+ other Republican candidates would have accomplished. And he should be lauded because he's managed to quietly pass this agenda, under everyone's nose, by: ignoring historic norms, attacking American institutions that rely on people's confidence, destroying everyone's career that comes in contact with his administration, violating our Constitution, and most likely colluding with our biggest adversary of the past 100 years.
Just brilliant.
Not recognizing the important distinctions and nuances in various arguments causes you to
post nothingburgers.
That would be funny if it actually was an example of nuance.
I will concede, low energy prices are not good for Russia's economy, but once again, which Republican candidate wasn't in the Energy sector's pocket/corner?That’s a fair point. Trump indeed has ignored historic norms. He doesn’t seem to take a lot of counsel and he is more decisive. I don’t see that he has violated the constitution in a structural fashion as other POTUS’s had. That collusion stuff is a red herring. Trump’s energy policies are driving the “biggest adversary’s” economy into the toilet.
CoH: Trump is to you, what Putin is to Trump.
Nope. My comments about Trump are infinitely more nuanced than Trump’s comments about Putin.
So the California shooter at the veteran's facility had licenses and was a firearms trainer. He also had been treated for PTSD at the facility. This is where the debate becomes very difficult.
On one hand, if we had taken his guns because he was in treatment, this incident may have been averted. On the other hand, he (And others) may well not seek treatment if they feel there guns will be taken. Whatever the answer is, it is not as simple as "stop people with mental health issues from buying guns". All strict enforcement of that will do is stop people from seeking treatment.
The fact that a highly trained gun owner slipped a cog and killed people proves only that we need to flood the zone with even more highly trained people with even more and even bigger guns.This also shows that a “good guy” with a gun can become a “bad guy” with a guy. He was a law abiding gun owner with a high level of training, and still...
The fact that a highly trained gun owner slipped a cog and killed people proves only that we need to flood the zone with even more highly trained people with even more and even bigger guns.
Of course. If we'd reduce gun violence by having more people go armed in more places, then surely the biggest safety gains will occur in just the sort of places we've been trying to keep guns out of. Bars, for example. We should definitely encourage more people to take their guns with them when they go to bars.And put them in schools.
I was thinking NFL games. What could possibly go wrong with 60,000 testosterone laden heavily armed drunk fans.Of course. If we'd reduce gun violence by having more people go armed in more places, then surely the biggest safety gains will occur in just the sort of places we've been trying to keep guns out of. Bars, for example. We should definitely encourage more people to take their guns with them when they go to bars.
Good point. You definitely want to have the good armed drunks there to combat the bad armed drunks.I was thinking NFL games. What could possibly go wrong with 60,000 testosterone laden heavily armed drunk fans.
Of course. If we'd reduce gun violence by having more people go armed in more places, then surely the biggest safety gains will occur in just the sort of places we've been trying to keep guns out of. Bars, for example. We should definitely encourage more people to take their guns with them when they go to bars.
The most fun part is watching our President troll leftist mental midgets into twitching, drooling fits of frustration and denial.Not recognizing the important distinctions and nuances in various arguments causes you to
post nothingburgers.
Well, look what crawled out from under its rock. Shouldn't you be off having "civil discourse" someplace?The most fun part is watching our President troll leftist mental midgets into twitching, drooling fits of frustration and denial.
Pure comedy.
I don’t remember the presidency being about trolling anyone. I prefer to have functioning adults running things who seem to make calculated, thoughtful decisions, regardless of whether or not I agree with them. I prefer not having a 71-year-old man acting like a child.The most fun part is watching our President troll leftist mental midgets into twitching, drooling fits of frustration and denial.
Pure comedy.
I was led to believe by many on here that veteran status means you are wholly qualified to pack heat in a school.So the California shooter at the veteran's facility had licenses and was a firearms trainer. He also had been treated for PTSD at the facility. This is where the debate becomes very difficult.
On one hand, if we had taken his guns because he was in treatment, this incident may have been averted. On the other hand, he (And others) may well not seek treatment if they feel there guns will be taken. Whatever the answer is, it is not as simple as "stop people with mental health issues from buying guns". All strict enforcement of that will do is stop people from seeking treatment.
I don't recall anyone saying that here.I was led to believe by many on here that veteran status means you are wholly qualified to pack heat in a school.
#Naivete
Well there was that discussion. A lot of people who should know better, saying that theyve got extensive small arms training, and therefore that qualifies them to walk around schools. When I attempted to throw some sanity on that conversation, I was quickly piled on. But, it’s all good. It’s almost spring time. And I’ve made enough on sports gambling this year to buy my smoker finally.I don't recall anyone saying that here.
Nobody said that in my recollection. Don’t recall anyone piling on either. I recall a discussion about relative proficiency with weapons.Well there was that discussion. A lot of people who should know better, saying that theyve got extensive small arms training, and therefore that qualifies them to walk around schools. When I attempted to throw some sanity on that conversation, I was quickly piled on. But, it’s all good. It’s almost spring time. And I’ve made enough on sports gambling this year to buy my smoker finally.
I think I’m starting entry level. Likely the Weber SM. Any reason not to try this before investing heavily later if I like it?Nobody said that in my recollection. Don’t recall anyone piling on either. I recall a discussion about relative proficiency with weapons.
Enjoy the smoker. I’m due for a new one myself. What brand you getting?
I think I’m starting entry level. Likely the Weber SM. Any reason not to try this before investing heavily later if I like it?
Nope. I started with a pretty cheap Weber smoker. Worked great.I think I’m starting entry level. Likely the Weber SM. Any reason not to try this before investing heavily later if I like it?