Fan Duel has released IU’s 2024 projected win total at 5.5.
I’m taking the over.
I’m taking the over.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s gonna piss 3C off!Fan Duel has IU’s 2024 projected win total at 5.5.
I’m taking the over.
Bulletin board material.That’s gonna piss 3C off!
I disagree. The ‘24 schedule is generally favorable on paper. Not saying Allen would’ve gone over, but I think Vegas would’ve given a similar line.If IU kept Allen, that number would've been 3.5.
So we've improved by 2 wins even before spring practice.
It'll be 6.5 by August.
No way... Vegas line balances the wagers. Nobody would've bet Indiana if Allen was coming back. Especially as our roster probably would be weaker. Would've needed an O/U of 4 to 4.5 to get many Hoosier fan bets.I disagree. The ‘24 schedule is generally favorable on paper. Not saying Allen would’ve gone over, but I think Vegas would’ve given a similar line.
I don’t think Vegas got on Google and said Cigs is a winner and were blown away by his JMU guys coming over. I think they looked at the schedule.No way... Vegas line balances the wagers. Nobody would've bet Indiana if Allen was coming back. Especially as our roster probably would be weaker. Would've needed an O/U of 4 to 4.5 to get many Hoosier fan bets.
Vegas bettors got on google, for sure. It's about cash.I don’t think Vegas got on Google and said Cigs is a winner and were blown away by his JMU guys coming over. I think they looked at the schedule.
ironicWith a very capable veteran quarterback, an offensive system that currently has the number one prospect in the country gushing, and Cignetti's proven w/l record, I expect at least a bowl game in year one.
Cignetti doesn't care what the past results were; past results shouldn't be indicative of future results anyway.
Oh come on, don't rain on my parade! Lolironic
Paraphrase: IU’s past results aren’t indicative of future performance because Cignetti’s past results ARE indicative of future performance.
What's more relevant to the success of the team...a proven coach and new players, or the uniforms and the stadium? There's nothing ironic about that at all. We get it, CTA would've had whatever success CCC has this year. Whoa is me. Hand-wringing.ironic
Paraphrase: IU’s past results aren’t indicative of future performance because Cignetti’s past results ARE indicative of future performance.
I'm with you. I believe betting on 5-5.5-6 W's is shorting IUFB. Piss poor offensive and defensive leadership + Allen's COO generalship were doomed before Fall Camp. Competent, experienced QB with the same from WR's and DC who can keep the Jimmys and Joes in the proper position because they make the right reads gives us positive results we've not seen from both the O and D for some time. I get a very strong impression a Coach Cignetti run team executes gameplan plays with pretty high % of efficiency. We'll see. But it'll be better under current staff than the yearly rejiggered staffs of Allen.I've been beating the bowl-game-or-bust drum since Cigs was hired and I genuinely believe that with the schedule this year that is what the fans should expect. Especially with the bravado the team has been pumping out.
Our schedule is very favorable especially when penciled in L's have lost their coaching staff. The difference last year was a collapse in the final three games after fumbling a leads. We've turned the team over to a more competent staff that was able to retain the top Hoosiers in the portal.
The statement was 100% ironic. But I was just messing with him.What's more relevant to the success of the team...a proven coach and new players, or the uniforms and the stadium? There's nothing ironic about that at all. We get it, CTA would've had whatever success CCC has this year. Woe is me. Hand-wringing.
And if 'IFs and BUTs' were beer and nuts, this would be one heck of a party.. If the ‘23 team had won 3 of the 5 games that came down to the literal last minute then CTA would still be here and the Vegas O/U would likely be the same as it is now. I’m not sure why this is so controversial.
And I don’t know why you find it so amazing that Vegas could see that the team wasn’t actually all that bad last year (disregarding coaching quality) and would be poised to do better with a more favorable schedule. EDIT: AND with better coaching.I don't know why you find it so amazing that Vegas thinks we improved with a coaching staff change and large roster turnover.
That is, what I've been saying.And I don’t know why you find it so amazing that Vegas could see that the team wasn’t actually all that bad last year (disregarding coaching quality) and would be poised to do better with a more favorable schedule. EDIT: AND with better coaching.
Rourke could find himself in the NFL discussion if he has a good year. He has the size and arm.That QB was a big get.
Last year's team greatly underachieved...I think the performance against PSU showed that there was winning talent on the roster.And I don’t know why you find it so amazing that Vegas could see that the team wasn’t actually all that bad last year (disregarding coaching quality) and would be poised to do better with a more favorable schedule. EDIT: AND with better coaching.
I don't see where our schedule's that favorable.I've been beating the bowl-game-or-bust drum since Cigs was hired and I genuinely believe that with the schedule this year that is what the fans should expect. Especially with the bravado the team has been pumping out.
Our schedule is very favorable especially when penciled in L's have lost their coaching staff. The difference last year was a collapse in the final three games after fumbling a leads. We've turned the team over to a more competent staff that was able to retain the top Hoosiers in the portal.
3 gimmees in FIU, W. Illinois, & CharlotteI don't see where our schedule's that favorable.
My son made a rare trip to the casino and won at the slot machines. He was playing with house money so before he left, he placed a $6 bet that IU would win the national title. He is probably the reason for the half game. BTW, he will win $6,000 when we win the title.Fan Duel has released IU’s 2024 projected win total at 5.5.
I’m taking the over.
He was supposed to be NFL bound after this past season but injuries derailed any chance at that. He's been the #1 prospect for the '24 and now '25 CFL draft so he's going to play football somewhere at the next level. Here's hoping he shows out as the starter and pushes himself to a day 2 draft spot in April next year.Rourke could find himself in the NFL discussion if he has a good year. He has the size and arm.
Glad to hear that. Makes my bet feel more secure.Not sure I’d touch iu at 5.5 if I’m being honest. To me, the two plays I like the most are Purdue and Rutgers over. Probably look at msu and um under and Oregon over as well.
FYI, this thread is on an IU board to discuss how many wins we might get next year.Not sure I’d touch iu at 5.5 if I’m being honest. To me, the two plays I like the most are Purdue and Rutgers over. Probably look at msu and um under and Oregon over as well.
Pretty obvious it’s a thread to discuss iu’s win total. Thanks for confirming that my post was on topic. As a bonus, I threw in a couple other plays I like in the big ten. You are welcome.FYI, this thread is on an IU board to discuss how many wins we might get next year.
PUke model fan. About as useless as nipples on a chicken.Pretty obvious it’s a thread to discuss iu’s win total. Thanks for confirming that my post was on topic. As a bonus, I threw in a couple other plays I like in the big ten. You are welcome.
What would the schedule tell them without an idea of how good each team will be?I don’t think Vegas got on Google and said Cigs is a winner and were blown away by his JMU guys coming over. I think they looked at the schedule.
You said you'd take the PU over. What is the o/u on wins for PU? 0.5? Otherwise, take the under. I think PU finishes last in the B1G in 2024.Pretty obvious it’s a thread to discuss iu’s win total. Thanks for confirming that my post was on topic. As a bonus, I threw in a couple other plays I like in the big ten. You are welcome.
This is a thread about iu over/under with no other gambling props allowed. Start another thread and I’ll gladly tell you and tell you why I believe the over is the play.You said you'd take the PU over. What is the o/u on wins for PU? 0.5? Otherwise, take the under. I think PU finishes last in the B1G in 2024.
You suck lol. Go to the Purdue board.This is a thread about iu over/under with no other gambling props allowed. Start another thread and I’ll gladly tell you and tell you why I believe the over is the play.