Outkick has 1.3M subscribers and Dan got a total of about 22K views in a month with those two interviews. He got more listeners on a bad day on his local sports radio show. Not to mention he used to do ESPN nationally televised games and appear on SC.
I did not know any of this.
You might want to get out yourself and take a look at Dakich’s social media responses. If Outkick had 85M views, it isn’t helping him any. For example, go look at his X activity. He seems to spend lots of time posting political content. And it appears to be extremely rare that he ever gets more than 100 responses, and usually less than 50 on the posts I see. That is lame, given that is his job.
Reason # 6,798 for not getting back onto Twatter
I’m just glad he finally shaved his head. Watching him try to part a few hairs on TV, then they showed the back side of his head. I hurt for the guy. So insecure.
Most of us can’t look at his Twitter feed, I’d be willing to bet. Because sack up guy is the softest guy in the world and has blocked everyone that disagrees with him.
I was going to say only an idiot or someone looking to generate controversy would say such a thing in the last 20 years. You weren't looking to generate controversy, were you?
I didn't bring up Dan's post. Yeah, I think he was stirring things up, but he was making a point that I was somewhat echoing. If he brings up the race of his wife he is a racist. But if people bring up the race of a minority then they aren't.
No, I said he was trying to stir up controversy and you were just being dumb. Yep, life's not fair. I'm sorry you're looked at as ignorant, and possibly racist, for feeling the need to inquire about "the right" to point out your wife is white. Small trade off for the benefits you and I have enjoyed as white men. I'm sure since that's important to you, you wish you'd been born black so you could talk about your race more in public without being labeled ignorant or racist, right?
We see DD for who and what he is. Van and others think he’s “standing up” for his beliefs. All he did was use them and the people who disagree. I generally ignore those types. Make fun of them on occasion. Intentional and desperate. Jason Aldean did the same with his crappy video. People took the spoonful. They sell and I don’t buy.
You realize you're talking to the same idiot who several months back said it was okay to hit a woman if she was the aggressor. From a man who preaches the bible, I couldn't believe he had such an easy time forgetting the "turn the other cheek" portion. I guess any "good woman" should know better.
I have. I became a grandpa in this century. My grandson who is in 2nd grade had his first basketball practice yesterday. He is at practice tonight and their first game is on Sunday.
How is any of that really racist? Do you really think Dan was hailing the race of his wife? No, he was making a very good point. White people in our culture can be diminished. You can bring up their race and blame all the ills of society on them without any repercussion. People who were never slave owners get blamed for slavery while those who were never slaves who think they are still influenced by the practice are coddled. Yeah, you know come to think of it you are right. We, because we are white have had tons of privilege. I don't buy that by the way. Name me one law on the books today that is tailor made to make white people have an upper hand?
It’s just hard to believe people not only think this way, but are proud to put it in words for all the world to see. Sigh.
Lol how is he using some random dude on a message board?
He uses guys like him for ratings. For views. Sheep are sheep. DD creates controversy for attention. It’s comical. DD doesn’t care and if he can get views for it he does it.
Oh, if you've been watching, and I suspect you have, it's not that hard to believe!
tried and true script in talk radio and shock journalist. Sound's like Dans just gone from trying to piss off IU faithful for ratings to a larger group. Same recipe, just slightly different ingredients!
Say subtle things that get people to notice or just be blatant. It’s the same crap. People eat it up and are “outraged”. People will believe anything. He knew what he was doing. Eat it up sheeplings.
Good grief. It’s the same. It’s all the same!!!!!! They create the outrage. You just listen to a certain brand of it. I choose neither. They are using you if you follow. It’s so blatantly obvious too.
Radio, TV. You choose . Fox, daytime, mainstream. They speak to their audience to create outrage, controversy, conflict against the other side. It’s crazy how easy people fall for it. I work with people constantly outraged.
Please, I'm not having this discussion with you, but laws have mostly been scrubbed, but how they're enforced... and how less legal things like perceptions and practices in hiring, lending, school boundaries, etc... It doesn't take much research or observation to see what goes on and has gone on.
