Which news source do you trust to report facts accurately, without a need to check them?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which news source do you trust to report facts accurately, without a need to check them?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
FNC, WSJ, and NY Post. The National Enquirer has more credibility than the rest of the media.
I gave this a Like for comedic value.FNC, WSJ, and NY Post. The National Enquirer has more credibility than the rest of the media.
I like the thread you started but I don’t think it’s an answer that can be given. Wallace at Fox News is worth watching. He could be the best of them. I think Brian Williams probably is. I like what Rachel Maddow has to offer. I watch Cuomo on the regular. I like tapper. I like Anderson Cooper. I could honestly go on and on.Which news source do you trust to report facts accurately, without a need to check them?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
I was wondering what you were doing.I gave this a Like for comedic value.
I appreciate that, but imo, reputable news sources should do more than capture zeitgeist. They should gather facts and information about a host of topics each and every day and build an information base such that if you read those sources regularly (even if each story doesn't seem zeitgeisty in the moment), you'll be better informed and have a more thorough understanding of national and world affairs.Serious reply:
If you want to get a good feel for the current zeitgeist, keep the Drudge Report loaded in your browser. Matt is doing a much better job of curating the news than he once did.
Fair. My point, poorly communicated, was that Drudge does a good job of linking to good sources (not the crazy shit he used to link) who are reporting on the news of the day.I appreciate that, but imo, reputable news sources should do more than capture zeitgeist. They should gather facts and information about a host of topics each and every day and build an information base such that if you read those sources regularly (even if each story doesn't seem zeitgeisty in the moment), you'll be better informed and have a more thorough understanding of national and world affairs.
Edit: inadvertently had a fwiw instead of an imo originally. Fixed it.
I peruse Google News on my phone. Based on the headlines, I don't know who is the most slanted, CNN or Fox. I rarely open up a story from either.Google. If I really want to know the truth about a story I will scan multiple sources. I can't say there is any single source I trust for everything.
I gave this a Like for comedic value.
I appreciate the honesty. It tells you how loony tunes the poster is. He’s fed propaganda and laps it up.
FNC, WSJ, and NY Post. The National Enquirer has more credibility than the rest of the media.
NPR. PBS News.
And a few political podcasts that are definitely slanted but facts are facts.
Edit: If cables news, like for breaking news coverage, I prefer MSNBC, but don’t care for some of the extra commentary sometimes. I don’t think they lie like FNC but, as the kids say, it can be too extra.
Facts are what is made of them to make us believe what the news wants us to believe.
You a fan of Jordan Peterson?
Which news source do you trust to report facts accurately, without a need to check them?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
Never heard of him. I don't do social media or you tube.
Which news source do you trust to report facts accurately, without a need to check them?
The one you read, listen to or watch first and trust most?
I try to read and view as many different sources, with different slants that time allows and then if the topic is important to me I go on to research it myself...
I can tell you who I don't trust, I don't trust anyone who's wedded to watching or reading a single source and would never consider viewing others just because they might present a different viewpoint... Right or Left...
I just looked him up. I don't know him but I did see a video sent to me recently of him dismantling a feminist news host. I know nothing about him, but he destroyed her argument.
I like listening to his thoughts. I don’t agree with a lot of them.You a fan of Jordan Peterson?
Interesting. I’m not a huge fan, but I would give that a shot.Also the Chris Hayes podcast "Why is this Happening?"
It’s what made him famous.I just looked him up. I don't know him but I did see a video sent to me recently of him dismantling a feminist news host. I know nothing about him, but he destroyed her argument.
I like listening to his thoughts. I don’t agree with a lot of them.
Nailed it. This describes me.None of them when it comes to "Trust"... That's why I try to run back and forth to most of them...
They all have editors, producers, writers and owners with their own particular slant on life... That shouldn't preclude them from a reasonable apolitical presentation of a news event but these days it usually does..., and in a big way...
I try to read and view as many different sources, with different slants that time allows and then if the topic is important to me I go on to research it myself...
I can tell you who I don't trust, I don't trust anyone who's wedded to watching or reading a single source and would never consider viewing others just because they might present a different viewpoint... Right or Left...
And yet, miraculously you always seem to come out consistently with one particular slant.
I think some people would call it confirmation bias but in your case, I like to think it's just social conditioning.
I’m tryingSome follow his word like his word is the final word and that can be annoying, which can lead them to rejecting basic science. Just like alcohol, take it in moderation.
I have opinions of him but I’ll keep it to myself. I’ll just say many take what he has to say out of context or too far.
It’s what made him famous.
And yet, miraculously you always seem to come out consistently with one particular slant.
I think some people would call it confirmation bias but in your case, I like to think it's just social conditioning.