...to read the Indy Star article regarding PU's domination of iu basketball, longest since 1913.
Freaking pathetic.
Freaking pathetic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I guess, get used to it or stop caring. We need to give Archie a 5 year extension ala Crean just so Lander makes to campus, disappoints, goes pro, and we can make sure Archie I set for life while we miss the tourney for another 5 years … I mean, as if that should be the bar, it's ridiculous. People say that IU's cachet is old, no kids know it, well we still pay coaches like we expect people to remember. If that's really the case and nobody can turn this around then give Fife a chance, bring MD or Sampson back. What is the point of trying to put out optics that your trying to compete if you aren't trying and don't care?...to read the Indy Star article regarding PU's domination of iu basketball, longest since 1913.
Freaking pathetic.
You didn't even make it 24 hours...I guess, get used to it or stop caring. We need to give Archie a 5 year extension ala Crean just so Lander makes to campus, disappoints, goes pro, and we can make sure Archie I set for life while we miss the tourney for another 5 years … I mean, as if that should be the bar, it's ridiculous. People say that IU's cachet is old, no kids know it, well we still pay coaches like we expect people to remember. If that's really the case and nobody can turn this around then give Fife a chance, bring MD or Sampson back. What is the point of trying to put out optics that your trying to compete if you aren't trying and don't care?
I guess, get used to it or stop caring. We need to give Archie a 5 year extension ala Crean just so Lander makes to campus, disappoints, goes pro, and we can make sure Archie I set for life while we miss the tourney for another 5 years … I mean, as if that should be the bar, it's ridiculous. People say that IU's cachet is old, no kids know it, well we still pay coaches like we expect people to remember. If that's really the case and nobody can turn this around then give Fife a chance, bring MD or Sampson back. What is the point of trying to put out optics that your trying to compete if you aren't trying and don't care?
Tired of falling to the ground?Is that for sale on Facebook marketplace? Looks to be in good condition. How much you asking for it? I don’t want to take it away from you if you are still using it.
Good to know that you heard about Lander committing. Remember when you commented that IU couldn’t get a commitment from Lander after he already committed. That would have been funny if you weren’t serious. Now you expect us to think your opinion has any merit? LaughableI guess, get used to it or stop caring. We need to give Archie a 5 year extension ala Crean just so Lander makes to campus, disappoints, goes pro, and we can make sure Archie I set for life while we miss the tourney for another 5 years … I mean, as if that should be the bar, it's ridiculous. People say that IU's cachet is old, no kids know it, well we still pay coaches like we expect people to remember. If that's really the case and nobody can turn this around then give Fife a chance, bring MD or Sampson back. What is the point of trying to put out optics that your trying to compete if you aren't trying and don't care?
Success is the best way to stick it to Purdue and that comes through tournament runs. We're on par to make the tournament in year 3. IMO you need benchmarks with any employer/employee relationship, and despite what many think Miller is still an employee. At this point he's on track to get us to the tournament. Many supporters of Miller want to get into the minutiae of what they see game in and game out as justification for support. Frankly I don't give a sh*t. Results are all that matter, not minutiae of incremental improvement nor the details of game by game stuff. Outcomes in a reasonable amount of time, that's what matters - everyone has excuses, deal with it....to read the Indy Star article regarding PU's domination of iu basketball, longest since 1913.
Freaking pathetic.
Several of the perpetually negative declared IU recruiting “dead.” Obviously it isn’t dead. There are quite a few rumors out there from people that have proven credible about other recruiting predictions that Kaufman is next. Recruiting is far from dead,Good to know that you heard about Lander committing. Remember when you commented that IU couldn’t get a commitment from Lander after he already committed. That would have been funny if you weren’t serious. Now you expect us to think your opinion has any merit? Laughable
This the the Archie Miller era. The darkest stain ever for our program. The lowest of lows. And some people can’t even see where we’re at.
That’s so ridiculously dumb that it should be quoted twice,This the the Archie Miller era. The darkest stain ever for our program. The lowest of lows. And some people can’t even see where we’re at.
Just because you don’t like reality doesn’t make it any less true. If we finish with the same conference record they should get in over us. They swept us. A couple extra early cupcake wins doesn’t change that.The column was just another trashing of IU by Doyle who loves to rub our noses in it. His preference for Purdue and all things black and gold has no bounds when he suggest that a 17-16 Purdue team should be NCAA selected over a 20-12 IU team if they both finish with those records. I suggest he look up the series records since 1940.
Just because you don’t like reality doesn’t make it any less true. If we finish with the same conference record they should get in over us. They swept us. A couple extra early cupcake wins doesn’t change that.
But they’re the better team. Do you really not get that?They swept us but we beat better teams and they lost to worse teams. Do you really not get that?
Before I forget, my condolences on Lander. That and making the tourney must have you feeling pretty yucky
But they’re the better team. Do you really not get that?
This the the Archie Miller era. The darkest stain ever for YOUR program. The lowest of lows. And some people can’t even see where YOU ARE at.
But they’re the better team. Do you really not get that?
The one they show on the scoreboard tends to be highly reliable.By what metric?
Seasons don’t work with the teams that win games being considered better than the teams they beat? Do tell. Math in Ferguson must be hard.they were def better for two particular games. But that’s not how seasons work. Lol. But feel free to spend your empty days lobbying the NCAA to change their tourney criteria.
again, what jacked up causes you fellas take on.
The one they show on the scoreboard tends to be highly reliable.
Seasons don’t work with the teams that win games being considered better than the teams they beat? Do tell. Math in Ferguson must be hard.
Do you really consider IU to be better than Purdue? Are you really taking that position?Ok, they beat us twice. Sooo, last year we were better than MSU?
We were the better team?
We beat them twice.
And I didn't even realize that we should have made the tourney because of that! Who knew.
No wonder you’re not able to talk hoops. You’re even dumber than we all thought. Ferguson must’ve done a number on you.they really do. Holy f, you are an ate up dude.
Do you really consider IU to be better than Purdue? Are you really taking that position?
So I'm assuming that's a yes on us being better than MSU last year and that we should have been in the NCAAT over them since you don't seem to have an answer for the question.No wonder you’re not able to talk hoops. You’re even dumber than we all thought. Ferguson must’ve done a number on you.
MSU showed last year those wins were an anomaly and that they were the better team. No one other than you would deny that. IU hasn’t demonstrated anything like that. Not one thing. Funny that you think IU is better than Purdue even though they’ve soundly beaten us twice. Anything to perpetuate the myth of improvement, huh?You stated that since they beat us twice that they were the better team.
Ok, by that metric we were better than MSU last year. Your metric not mine.
I answered it . . . are you also suggesting IU is better than Purdue? Please tell us why that’s so. Lol.So I'm assuming that's a yes on us being better than MSU last year and that we should have been in the NCAAT over them since you don't seem to have an answer for the question.
What does that mean? purdue hasn't had coaching changes and major disruptions. Considering the teams IU has had, it isn't much of a surprise....to read the Indy Star article regarding PU's domination of iu basketball, longest since 1913.
Freaking pathetic.
This is year 3 of Miller. So you're saying there's never been a worse 3 year stretch in IU history? Tom Crean says hi.This the the Archie Miller era. The darkest stain ever for our program. The lowest of lows. And some people can’t even see where we’re at.
So the answer is "because you say so". Got it. Sound reasoning. Carry on.MSU showed last year those wins were an anomaly and that they were the better team. No one other than you would deny that. IU hasn’t demonstrated anything like that. Not one thing. Funny that you think IU is better than Purdue even though they’ve soundly beaten us twice. Anything to perpetuate the myth of improvement, huh?
MSU showed last year those wins were an anomaly and that they were the better team. No one other than you would deny that. IU hasn’t demonstrated anything like that. Not one thing. Funny that you think IU is better than Purdue even though they’ve soundly beaten us twice. Anything to perpetuate the myth of improvement, huh?
Go look at the overall results last year and concluding that MSU was better isn’t difficult. Saying Purdue is better than IU this year isn’t difficult, either. Well, unless you’re not a hoops guy, which you’re not. (Here comes the part where you tell us what an expert you are)So the answer is "because you say so". Got it. Sound reasoning. Carry on.
I didn’t imply that Purdue beat IU twice. They actually did, as the scoreboard made quite clear. They’re obviously better. Take out IU’s 7 wins over Cupcake State and the schedule issue becomes even clearer.I am not denying or perpetuating ANYTHING.
You said that PU was the better team. I asked by what metric and you stated the scoreboard, implying that they had beaten us twice.
By that metric, IU was a better team than MSU last year.
YOUR metric, not mine.
You did NOT talk about PU's OOC wins or their strength of schedule Vs. IU or anything else.
Go look at the overall results last year and concluding that MSU was better isn’t difficult. Saying IU is better than Purdue this year isn’t difficult, either.
Cougar and Bino think IU is better than Purdue. A classic demonstration of lowered expectations.Exactly.
Cougar and Bino think IU is better than Purdue. A classic demonstration of lowered expectations.
Go look at the overall results last year and concluding that MSU was better isn’t difficult. Saying IU is better than Purdue this year isn’t difficult, either.
Didn’t phrase that well and I corrected it. Purdue is obviously the better team. Bino and Coug are the ones who believe otherwise.Looks like you feel the same way...