FREEDUMB!One of the leaders of Open Maryland has COVID. Oh, and he refuses to work with the contact tracers.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1232336
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FREEDUMB!One of the leaders of Open Maryland has COVID. Oh, and he refuses to work with the contact tracers.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1232336
So, is the ethos here that working with contact tracers is the equivalent of being a snitch?FREEDUMB!
That’s your bias coming out. I could post a thousand pics of blm protestors protesting inches apart without masks. California and something like 25 plus states are seeing spikes. It’s not just the sunbelt. As for the graphs in this post do your own research. More than 30 euro countries are seeing spikes over the last two weeks according to the director for the WHO Europe. Think for yourself. Either social distancing matters or it doesn’t...and tens of thousands of blm protestors weren’t wearing masks and weren’t social distancing. A two second google images search evidences same.
So, is the ethos here that working with contact tracers is the equivalent of being a snitch?
We all live in a Clint Eastwood movie now . . . .
When Ingraham starts getting concerned about corporate "privacy" policies and use of customer information, I'll start paying attention. Until then, I consider Ingraham an American ingrate.It's more serious than that Sope... Laura started ranting about it back in May, and it's right up there with wearing masks on the right-wing "you're taking away our freedom" scale... And this tame compared to some of the other wingnut claims...
Link on Drudge says that a much higher percentage of ICU beds in Houston are being taken by younger people than was the case when the city had its first wave several weeks ago.
https://theweek.com/speedreads/9225...uston-hospital-system-are-reportedly-under-50so give us the link if you have one.
It’s on the in.gov website. I check it daily.zeke posted an article citing increased hospitalizations of youngers with "serious" issues, but then it said most were asymptomatic in the same article.
if significantly greater numbers of youngers do start having significant issues or are dying, that obviously would be huge news.
and percentages can be deceiving absent real numbers being attached as well.
that said, the reporting from day one regarding covis has been beyond bizarre to say the least as to age, and we literally never get any age based info other than on "confirmed cases" in youngers going up, which is likely because only recently have youngers been being tested at all...
it's as if all age based data has been deliberately withheld by the govt and all mainstream media since day one.
ever see an obituary that didn't include the age of death?
me either.
yet age or any other possible factor is never attached to any covid death, hospitalizations, or ICU, numbers.
NEVER!
the Btown paper reports 28 county covid deaths to date, (jumped up from 6 almost overnight with zero explanation), yet i've never seen any breakdown by age or any other contributing factor.
nor see it anywhere else.
and while "The Week" is a legit publication, where is everyone else including the MSM.
we should be seeing precise age and other factors data breakdowns attached to all reports of covid cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths, as age and other factors data are obviously a very important part of the story.
i will watch for Texas and other exploding states data, (if available at all), to see where this goes.
that said, we're 5 months in and closing in on 125,000 deaths in the US.
and i'm guessing youngers have always comprised a significant, if not the greatest percent of infected, due to youngers being more socially active.
if the virus is somehow only now significantly affecting youngers when it didn't up till now, that would be a huge story in of itself and would bring up the obvious question of "why"..
so give us the link if you have one.
Nice when you have data to confirm the obvious.Has someone linked this research into Fox News' role. https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...d88aa2-b7c3-11ea-a8da-693df3d7674a_story.html
It’s on the in.gov website. I check it daily.
We have become the foremost shithole country. Thanks Donald!The US being subject to travel bans is the ultimate irony. Payback is a bitch.
We have become the foremost shithole country. Thanks Donald!
And expense. Those idiots who are spreading COVID by refusing to use precautions are costing us all a lot of money even if they don't kill us.If nothing else, we've benefited from having a bit more time to learn on the job and develop treatment protocols than did those in Europe who got hit earlier. But that will be cold comfort if we can't knock the infection rate down. A shit load of infections is still going to result in a shit load of deaths.
And expense. Those idiots who are spreading COVID by refusing to use precautions are costing us all a lot of money even if they don't kill us.
We've all seen those reports of the huge hospital bills of $70-80-100,000 (or more) for week-long hospitalizations and respirator usage. Now, we're learning that the less serious treatments also cost a lot of money -- a round of remdesivir treatment will cost $3,120 for only five days.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/covid-19-drug-remdesivir-cost-3120-us-patients/story?id=71509977#:~:text=Remdesivir will cost $520 per dose for private,first antiviral medication to show effectiveness against COVID-19.
No matter whether paid by private insurance (thus raising our future premiums) or Medicare or Medicaid or some special government COVID stimulus, all of us are ultimately going to get stuck paying for these idiots' treatments.
And expense. Those idiots who are spreading COVID by refusing to use precautions are costing us all a lot of money even if they don't kill us.
We've all seen those reports of the huge hospital bills of $70-80-100,000 (or more) for week-long hospitalizations and respirator usage. Now, we're learning that the less serious treatments also cost a lot of money -- a round of remdesivir treatment will cost $3,120 for only five days.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/covid-19-drug-remdesivir-cost-3120-us-patients/story?id=71509977#:~:text=Remdesivir will cost $520 per dose for private,first antiviral medication to show effectiveness against COVID-19.
No matter whether paid by private insurance (thus raising our future premiums) or Medicare or Medicaid or some special government COVID stimulus, all of us are ultimately going to get stuck paying for these idiots' treatments.
Ya. Got me. It’s sad that I had no problem believing it.I don't know if this picture is real or if it is made up, but it's funny/sad.
Then it gets funnier/sadder when you do the math!
OK, looked for it on Facebook, and it's flagged as a fake. Pretty funny though. A female VPM!
LOL. I didn't even catch the math angle.Then it gets funnier/sadder when you do the math!
Hmmm. So, did Trump make another brilliant deal in which he overpaid by $1,000 %? Wow. What a businessman. Maybe the manufacturer gave him dirt on Hillary to skew the price.Fyi:
US buys up world stock of key Covid-19 drug remdesivir
No other country will be able to buy remdesivir, which can help recovery from Covid-19, for next three months at least
The US has bought up virtually all the stocks for the next three months of one of the two drugs proven to work against Covid-19, leaving none for the UK, Europe or most of the rest of the world.
Experts and campaigners are alarmed both by the US unilateral action on remdesivir and the wider implications, for instance in the event of a vaccine becoming available. The Trump administration has already shown that it is prepared to outbid and outmanoeuvre all other countries to secure the medical supplies it needs for the US.
“They’ve got access to most of the drug supply [of remdesivir], so there’s nothing for Europe,” said Dr Andrew Hill, senior visiting research fellow at Liverpool University.
Remdesivir, the first drug approved by licensing authorities in the US to treat Covid-19, is made by Gilead and has been shown to help people recover faster from the disease. The first 140,000 doses, supplied to drug trials around the world, have been used up. The Trump administration has now bought more than 500,000 doses, which is all of Gilead’s production for July and 90% of August and September.
“President Trump has struck an amazing deal to ensure Americans have access to the first authorised therapeutic for Covid-19,” said the US health and human services secretary, Alex Azar. “To the extent possible, we want to ensure that any American patient who needs remdesivir can get it. The Trump administration is doing everything in our power to learn more about life-saving therapeutics for Covid-19 and secure access to these options for the American people.”
The drug, which was invented for Ebola but failed to work, is under patent to Gilead, which means no other company in wealthy countries can make it. The cost is around $3,200 per treatment of six doses, according to the US government statement.
The deal was announced as it became clear that the pandemic in the US is spiralling out of control. Anthony Fauci, the country’s leading public health expert and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told the Senate the US was sliding backwards.
“We are going in the wrong direction,” said Fauci. Last week the US saw a new daily record of 40,000 new coronavirus cases in one day. “I would not be surprised if we go up to 100,000 a day if this does not turn around,” he said. He could not provide an estimated death toll, but said: “It is going to be very disturbing, I guarantee you that.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...k-of-key-covid-19-drug?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
I posted the following on a different thread:
FYI from a chat with a few healthcare folks I know here, they arent entirely impressed with remdesivir's result. One said that its not convincing enough to justify America's action -- and feels its a knee jerk response to polls and rising cases there.
Not exactly unprecedented though. Invasive ventilators which normally cost $10k were being bought at $50-60k for the same machine at its peak by the various states.
It has to be mandated. I just read on FB posts from two friends. Both educated. One at Duke. Adamantly against masks. it's mind-numbing. my county just mandated it today. hopefully all or most follow. i'm convinced it's the only way....Unlike Trump, Gov. Holcomb has done a good job on messaging.
Right. And what about the schools? So far, in Indiana, they are just recommending it on buses, to my knowledge.It has to be mandated. I just read on FB posts from two friends. Both educated. One at Duke. Adamantly against masks. it's mind-numbing. my county just mandated it today. hopefully all or most follow. i'm convinced it's the only way....
Hmmm. So, did Trump make another brilliant deal in which he overpaid by $1,000 %? Wow. What a businessman. Maybe the manufacturer gave him dirt on Hillary to skew the price.
So we're up by 111,400 in 2020 over the average of the prior 3 years? Sounds about right . . . covid has increased the total number of deaths in the US - as of June 13 - by almost as much as the total deaths by covid - so far. With 115,200 deaths as of June 13, maybe 4,000 people would have died anyway even without covid . . .https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/mortality.html
CDC all deaths all causes through June 13th (by total death certs)/since March 30:
2017 1,334,407
2018 1,361,620
2019 1,347,134
2020 1,459,117
Good for Abbott . . . a Republican with some spine, finally.Better late than never.
So we're up by 111,400 in 2020 over the average of the prior 3 years? Sounds about right . . . covid has increased the total number of deaths in the US - as of June 13 - by almost as much as the total deaths by covid - so far. With 115,200 deaths as of June 13, maybe 4,000 people would have died anyway even without covid . . .
. . . can you identify which 4,000 those would be, JDB? Or said differently, can you identify which covid deaths wouldn't have happened but for covid?