Aw.........In those rules, regs etc posted were documented instances of violations of statutes, rules, protocols etc. I didn't figure you would respond to the facts but rather some short insult which you accomplished true to form.
Unsupported take on it......Do you live in a cave? I gave you numerous documented and supported examples including from the State Dept, Defense Dept, CIA, IG, security analyst, and many other sources. All of which I might add are part of this current administration.
My take on it includes someone is guilty of assorted crimes and someone should be indicted.
I took the time to point out the statutes, rules, exec orders etc involving and applicable to the documented examples. You mocked this fact. In general when you resort to attacking the messenger as opposed to the facts you have lost the debate.
It's a shame that perhaps you apparently think all these rules and regs on security are needless BS. It's pretty apparent Hillary felt the rules and regs total BS as well or at a minimum has shown a tendency pointing towards incompetence and negligence.
Whether she is indicted or not there were many well documented violations showing her complete disregard for security protocols.
Dispute this with facts not insults sir...go ahead.
Lack of prosecution in similar cases you say. Ask former CIA Director John Deutch who took some classified material home with him to work on his unsecured personal laptops that were connected to his home commercial internet. President Clinton pardoned him.
There are many cases of prosecution for violations of security protocols by the way. Although Petraus was a slightly different set of circumstances they went after him using the
very statutes and regs discussed in this thread and his charges also
included the fact that he had signed numerous documents that he knew and understood the rules and penalties. The actual court documents are online for your review if you doubt it.
On January 22nd, 2009, the day after assuming the office of Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton signed a “Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement” — or Standard Form 312. She signed and agreed to abide by these specific stipulations and punishments
1. Intending to be legally bound, I hereby accept the obligations contained in this Agreement in consideration of my being granted access to classified information. As used in this Agreement, classified information is marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications, that is classified under the standards of Executive Order 12958, or under any other Executive order or statute that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of information in the interest of national security; and unclassified information that meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination as provided in Sections 1.1. 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4(e) of Executive Order 12958, or under any other Executive order or statute that requires protection for such information in the interest of national security. I understand and accept that by being granted access to classified information, special confidence and trust shall be placed in me by the United States Government.
2. I hereby acknowledge that I have received a security indoctrination concerning the nature and protection of classified information, including the procedures to be followed in ascertaining whether other persons to whom I contemplate disclosing this information have been approved for access to it, and that I understand these procedures.
3. I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of classified information by me could cause damage or irreparable injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. I hereby agree that I will never divulge classified information to anyone unless: (a) I have officially verified that the recipient has been properly authorized by the United States Government to receive it; or (b) I have been given prior written notice of authorization from the United States Government Department or Agency (hereinafter Department or Agency) responsible for the classification of information or last granting me a security clearance that such disclosure is permitted. I understand that if I am uncertain about the classification status of information, I am required to confirm from an authorized official that the information is unclassified before I may disclose it, except to a person as provided in (a) or (b), above. I further understand that I am obligated to comply with laws and regulations that prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
4. I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in the termination of any security clearances I hold; removal from any position of special confidence and trust requiring such clearances; or termination of my employment or other relationships with the Departments or Agencies that granted my security clearance or clearances. In addition, I have been advised that any unauthorized disclosure of classified information by me may constitute a violation, or violations, of United States criminal laws, including the provisions of Sections 641, 793, 794, 798, *952 and 1924, Title 18, United States Code, *the provisions of Section 783(b), Title 50, United States Code, and the provisions of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. I recognize that nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violation.
Larry Mrozinski, who served almost four years as a senior military adviser and security manager in the State Department comments:
“Anybody else would have already lost their security clearance and be subjected to an espionage investigation,” Mrozinski added. “But apparently a different standard exists for Mrs. Clinton.”
Truth be told sir FACTS get in your way and as demonstrated here you ignore them with YOUR head in the sand.
Your correct about dealing with reality in this specific issue. The reality that people in high places, with connections, and protected by the admin responsible for enforcement of these many rules can escape prosecution sucks big time.
I am totally open and promise to be receptive to your thoughts showing, documenting, and proving that all of the classified materials found so far do not exist and Hillary wasn't involved. I have spent considerable time with providing facts and not fiction as opposed to paragraph long rants and one sentence long insults. You can't really defend her as you previous posted regarding the fact she might not have done anything wrong on purpose without making her look incompetent so you avoid the FACTS. Go through my several post and dispute each point with some kind of documentation, links, anything.
Wheres the BEEF?
