So did hunters turnover. Lead to a three.Cost IU the lead and the game.
Yep, sure did.Yup. Archie should have never left Green in the game as long as he did. Cost IU the game.
That wasn't Hunter's fault. Smith was supposed to come back to the ball, but he slipped and fell.So did hunters turnover. Lead to a three.
Bad Green last 3 minutes = Playoff KershawGreen is such a hot-cold player. At times really good, but then the bad. Not sure if the good is worth the bad.
Every poster in this thread to this point (except frikken, and me ) is a dipsh!t.Bad Green last 3 minutes = Playoff Kershaw
lol .. are you really that dumb?Our guards are horrible... worst defenders in the league, that's why we give up so many wide open threes because the guards can't stop anyone from driving the lane... horrible, everyone.
Did you not watch the watch the end of the game?To put this loss on Green is nonsense and frankly I’m sick of your bullshit rhetoric. IU loses this game going away if it weren’t for Green’s play today. Green fueled the comeback by hitting big shots and feeding the post. He was the only guard making his FT’s. He took a bad shot on IU’s second to last possession, but that isn’t why IU lost.
You’re quickly establishing yourself as one of the worst posters on this board and considering the amount of clowns that post on here, that’s tough to do.
Cost IU the lead and the game.
Hunter made 1 mistake, Green forced up 2 bricks at end of the game.Yup need more Anderson because I once saw him score on a 5'8" forward from Plymouth.
Green didn't lose this game, not in the least.
Hunter's turnover was the flip in momentum. Was nice to see Hunter play confidently but that was an absolute duck that he threw across court....dumb.
Did you not watch the watch the end of the game?
Hunter made 1 mistake, Green forced up 2 bricks at end of the game.
2 is greater than 1.
Green had no business forcing a low % 3pt brick when IU was dominating in the paint.
Green is a Senior.
Hunter is a redshirt Freshman.
Green should know better, but likely never will, I'm afraid.
I actually think Durhams quick three was the turning point. Led to break a fast break in the other direction, Layup plus a foul. Should’ve held the ball work some offense, run 25 seconds off the clock. He went for the dagger with the shot, but instead everything snowballed in the opposite direction at that pointInterjecting myself here, but did you?
Why no mention of the brink front end of the 1-1 for Phinisee?
Why no mention of the quick 3 point jack by Durham 5 seconds into the shot clock up 7 that led to a run out and subsequent And 1?
Why no mention of a missed FT by Hunter to make it a 3 score game and then his TO a minute later up 5?
Why no mention of TJD’s missed layup to win the game?
It’s painfully obvious that you have a driven agenda and can no longer view Green objectively. You’re turning into the IUScott of this board. That’s never good.
I actually think Durhams quick three was the turning point. Led to break a fast break in the other direction, Layup plus a foul. Should’ve held the ball work some offense, run 25 seconds off the clock. He went for the dagger with the shot, but instead everything snowballed in the opposite direction at that point
Hunter made 1 mistake, Green forced up 2 bricks at end of the game.
2 is greater than 1.
Green had no business forcing a low % 3pt brick when IU was dominating in the paint.
Green is a Senior.
Hunter is a redshirt Freshman.
Green should know better, but likely never will, I'm afraid.
I was going to answer but was basically beaten to it by the other replies.
The real questions you should be asking is either why was Hunter even in the game at the end instead of Brunk or why didn't we go with three guards in the last minute?
However, Durham took a horrible shot that clanked and turned into quick points.
Rob missed another front of a one on one that he needs to start making (remember last year at Iowa when he yet again missed game winning free throws which ended up costing us an NCAA seed?)
Hunter threw an absolute duck across court. My worry is he tends to be really lazy on his passes in general but that was a back breaker.
Green had 16 pts, 5 reb, 3 assists and 0 turnovers in 23 minutes.
He keeps playing like that and we'll win a lot of games.
Cowan beat him on straight line drives multiple times in the 2nd half that led to them being in the bonus.What isn’t even being mentioned is his defense. Green drew Cowan primarily in the 2H and there’s a reason why MD went 9-13 from 3 to start the game and a reason why they were 10-27 up until Wiggins hit that 3 and it’s because Green did a pretty good job stopping dribble penetration. IU loses that game going away without Green’s contributions today. UFO is as clueless as they come.
Cowan beat him on straight line drives multiple times in the 2nd half that led to them being in the bonus.
horrible shot selection at the end....why the quick 3's when we didn't need it! that game was in the bag!Did you not watch the watch the end of the game?
Everyone is going to focus on the end of the game but when we had a chance to put them away we fouled to many times.MD at one point was 1-14 from the 3pt line in the 2H. I never said he did a lock down job on on Cowan, but a pretty good job. Cowan missed two front ends at the line.
I totally agree. As much as People are complaining about Green, I remembered that play and thought it was Durham not Green, but I couldn't find the game play summary to confirm it. The problem with that shot was that it was taken early in the shot clock, when we didn't have floor balance and led to a run out and score by Maryland.I actually think Durhams quick three was the turning point. Led to break a fast break in the other direction, Layup plus a foul. Should’ve held the ball work some offense, run 25 seconds off the clock. He went for the dagger with the shot, but instead everything snowballed in the opposite direction at that point
He has done this for 4 years, missing forced low % shots in the middle of the shot clock resulting in losing games at the end.Green’s 3 pt brick resulted in an empty possession for Maryland the next trip down that ended up with Green grabbing a defensive rebound and making an extremely contested layup by Smith to push the score to 76-70. Yes the jumper Green took on IU’s second to last possession wasn’t ideal, but there was less than 10 seconds left on the shot clock.
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Exactly!horrible shot selection at the end....why the quick 3's when we didn't need it! that game was in the bag!
He has done this for 4 years, missing forced low % shots in the middle of the shot clock resulting in losing games at the end.
I agree on the lazy passes but it's not just Hunter. We throw WAY too many lazy passes to the wings to start the offense.I was going to answer but was basically beaten to it by the other replies.
The real questions you should be asking is either why was Hunter even in the game at the end instead of Brunk or why didn't we go with three guards in the last minute?
However, Durham took a horrible shot that clanked and turned into quick points.
Rob missed another front of a one on one that he needs to start making (remember last year at Iowa when he yet again missed game winning free throws which ended up costing us an NCAA seed?)
Hunter threw an absolute duck across court. My worry is he tends to be really lazy on his passes in general but that was a back breaker.
Green had 16 pts, 5 reb, 3 assists and 0 turnovers in 23 minutes.
He keeps playing like that and we'll win a lot of games.
I don't argue that Green played better today, but at the end of the game he made 1 contested layup, but took 2 low % 3's,especially the 2nd shot that was just very poor decision making when the game was on the line. Some guys play better during the bulk of the game but make very poor decisions when it is winning time. After 4 years this is a pattern. A good game that ended in defeat due to poor decision making and low execution when it was winning time. Collectively just too many mistakes and bad decisions at the end of the game, and a missed shot in the lane by IU's best player.I was going to answer but was basically beaten to it by the other replies.
The real questions you should be asking is either why was Hunter even in the game at the end instead of Brunk or why didn't we go with three guards in the last minute?
However, Durham took a horrible shot that clanked and turned into quick points.
Rob missed another front of a one on one that he needs to start making (remember last year at Iowa when he yet again missed game winning free throws which ended up costing us an NCAA seed?)
Hunter threw an absolute duck across court. My worry is he tends to be really lazy on his passes in general but that was a back breaker.
Green had 16 pts, 5 reb, 3 assists and 0 turnovers in 23 minutes.
He keeps playing like that and we'll win a lot of games.
I don't argue that Green played better today, but at the end of the game he made 1 contested layup, but took 2 low % 3's,especially the 2nd shot that was just very poor decision making when the game is on the line. Some guys play better during the bulk of the game but make very poor decisions when it is winning time. After 4 years this is a pattern. A good game that ended in defeat due to poor decision making and low execution when it was winning time.
I don't argue that Green played better today, but at the end of the game he made 1 contested layup, but took 2 low % 3's,especially the 2nd shot that was just very poor decision making when the game was on the line. Some guys play better during the bulk of the game but make very poor decisions when it is winning time. After 4 years this is a pattern. A good game that ended in defeat due to poor decision making and low execution when it was winning time. Collectively just too many mistakes and bad decisions at the end of the game, and a missed shot in the lane by IU's best player.
I was too hard on Green, many contributed to losing the lead late.Green didn't cost IU this game. Multiple players failed to execute the last minute or two. If any one of those did something different IU it might have won the game.
It was a tough loss but it certainly isn't in one player's head and I'd say less on Green than some others as already pointed out in this thread.
Agreed. He does much good and then....Cost IU the lead and the game.
So did durhams three 5 seconds into the shot clock.Cost IU the lead and the game.
So did durhams three 5 seconds into the shot clock.
CorrectSo did durhams three 5 seconds into the shot clock.