ADVERTISEMENT

Today in history: End of the Roman Empire, 1806

TheOriginalHappyGoat

Moderator
Moderator
Oct 4, 2010
70,118
46,005
113
Margaritaville
I'm always fascinated in the ways that historical events continue to reverberate for centuries. On the coastal islands of the mid-Atlantic United States, there are people who still speak a version of English very similar to what the original colonists spoke. In the English Channel, there is an island that is owned by the Queen, but not officially part of the United Kingdom, which only technically gave up feudalism in 2008. Things like that.

Anyway, while the Roman Republic was already a world power, Augustus essentially founded the Empire after his defeat of Mark Anthony at Actium in 31 BCE, and his subsequent consolidation of power over his remaining decades. Constantine moved the center of power from Rome to Byzantium, where the Roman Empire survived in its Eastern incarnation until the middle of the 15th century.

However, the Western Empire had collapsed in the 5th century, and the Eastern Empire had lost its ability to exert its influence there. So, in the 8th century, Pope Stephen II turned away from the East and toward the Franks for protection, a decision that culminated in the revival of the Western imperium in 800, when Charlemagne was declared Emperor.

The new Western Empire came to be called the Holy Roman Empire, and evolved into an essentially German state - or rather, a federation of states under a single, but not autocratic, Emperor. It withstood threats from within and without, but could not stand against Napoleon. On this day, in 1806, Francis II abdicated, ending the Holy Roman Empire, the last polity to claim authority descended from ancient Rome, just a month shy of 1,836 years after Augustus started it all.

When Napoleon was finally defeated, Francis, who was already Emperor, not only of Rome, but of Austria, had no desire to revive the Empire again (or, if he did, could not do so in the face of newfound Prussian power), and the rest of the European powers settled on the formation of the German Confederation as its replacement, a decision that eventually led to Prussian wars with Austria and France, the unification of Germany, and two world wars.

Anyway, in most ways that matter, the Holy Roman Empire that ended in 1806 was not the Roman Empire of Augustus. But it did represent the end of over 18 centuries of rulers claiming the same authority, dating back to the center of the ancient Western world. Eighteen centuries is a really, really long time. I find the way those tentacles of history can survive and move and motivate and influence the progression of history for so long to be fascinating almost beyond comprehension.
 
I'm always fascinated in the ways that historical events continue to reverberate for centuries. On the coastal islands of the mid-Atlantic United States, there are people who still speak a version of English very similar to what the original colonists spoke. In the English Channel, there is an island that is owned by the Queen, but not officially part of the United Kingdom, which only technically gave up feudalism in 2008. Things like that.

Anyway, while the Roman Republic was already a world power, Augustus essentially founded the Empire after his defeat of Mark Anthony at Actium in 31 BCE, and his subsequent consolidation of power over his remaining decades. Constantine moved the center of power from Rome to Byzantium, where the Roman Empire survived in its Eastern incarnation until the middle of the 15th century.

However, the Western Empire had collapsed in the 5th century, and the Eastern Empire had lost its ability to exert its influence there. So, in the 8th century, Pope Stephen II turned away from the East and toward the Franks for protection, a decision that culminated in the revival of the Western imperium in 800, when Charlemagne was declared Emperor.

The new Western Empire came to be called the Holy Roman Empire, and evolved into an essentially German state - or rather, a federation of states under a single, but not autocratic, Emperor. It withstood threats from within and without, but could not stand against Napoleon. On this day, in 1806, Francis II abdicated, ending the Holy Roman Empire, the last polity to claim authority descended from ancient Rome, just a month shy of 1,836 years after Augustus started it all.

When Napoleon was finally defeated, Francis, who was already Emperor, not only of Rome, but of Austria, had no desire to revive the Empire again (or, if he did, could not do so in the face of newfound Prussian power), and the rest of the European powers settled on the formation of the German Confederation as its replacement, a decision that eventually led to Prussian wars with Austria and France, the unification of Germany, and two world wars.

Anyway, in most ways that matter, the Holy Roman Empire that ended in 1806 was not the Roman Empire of Augustus. But it did represent the end of over 18 centuries of rulers claiming the same authority, dating back to the center of the ancient Western world. Eighteen centuries is a really, really long time. I find the way those tentacles of history can survive and move and motivate and influence the progression of history for so long to be fascinating almost beyond comprehension.
How would would you compare and contrast that Roman Empire/Byzantine/HRE legacy impact with an earlier still Roman Republic (U.S. “Westworld preferred cornerstone”?) and Roman Kingdom that adds what, another 1000 years?
 
How would would you compare and contrast that Roman Empire/Byzantine/HRE legacy impact with an earlier still Roman Republic (U.S. “Westworld preferred cornerstone”?) and Roman Kingdom that adds what, another 1000 years?
At the time, the early Empire was very much a continuation of the Republic, at least on paper. For hundreds of years, during what is now called the "Principate," the Emperors held legal authority by having the Senate bestow upon them various Republican offices. Power was only consolidated in one man through a complicated legal Republican fiction.

But in reality, it was consolidated in one man, and the legal fiction was only politically necessary red tape. There was a break at Augustus, a change in how power was ordered and used in the Roman world, and that change was never undone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AckAck
I'm always fascinated in the ways that historical events continue to reverberate for centuries. On the coastal islands of the mid-Atlantic United States, there are people who still speak a version of English very similar to what the original colonists spoke. In the English Channel, there is an island that is owned by the Queen, but not officially part of the United Kingdom, which only technically gave up feudalism in 2008. Things like that.

Anyway, while the Roman Republic was already a world power, Augustus essentially founded the Empire after his defeat of Mark Anthony at Actium in 31 BCE, and his subsequent consolidation of power over his remaining decades. Constantine moved the center of power from Rome to Byzantium, where the Roman Empire survived in its Eastern incarnation until the middle of the 15th century.

However, the Western Empire had collapsed in the 5th century, and the Eastern Empire had lost its ability to exert its influence there. So, in the 8th century, Pope Stephen II turned away from the East and toward the Franks for protection, a decision that culminated in the revival of the Western imperium in 800, when Charlemagne was declared Emperor.

The new Western Empire came to be called the Holy Roman Empire, and evolved into an essentially German state - or rather, a federation of states under a single, but not autocratic, Emperor. It withstood threats from within and without, but could not stand against Napoleon. On this day, in 1806, Francis II abdicated, ending the Holy Roman Empire, the last polity to claim authority descended from ancient Rome, just a month shy of 1,836 years after Augustus started it all.

When Napoleon was finally defeated, Francis, who was already Emperor, not only of Rome, but of Austria, had no desire to revive the Empire again (or, if he did, could not do so in the face of newfound Prussian power), and the rest of the European powers settled on the formation of the German Confederation as its replacement, a decision that eventually led to Prussian wars with Austria and France, the unification of Germany, and two world wars.

Anyway, in most ways that matter, the Holy Roman Empire that ended in 1806 was not the Roman Empire of Augustus. But it did represent the end of over 18 centuries of rulers claiming the same authority, dating back to the center of the ancient Western world. Eighteen centuries is a really, really long time. I find the way those tentacles of history can survive and move and motivate and influence the progression of history for so long to be fascinating almost beyond comprehension.
I need to read more on the Roman Empire. I've always heard/read that if fell from within. Do you agree with that? If it did, what happened? Do you have any book recommendations?
 
I need to read more on the Roman Empire. I've always heard/read that if fell from within. Do you agree with that? If it did, what happened? Do you have any book recommendations?
It's awfully complicated, and I'm not qualified to speak on it with any authority. But, it was certainly a combination of internal and external threats. Even though scholars don't consider it definitive, I suppose you should start by buying a lot of coffee, taking a week of PTO at work, and reading Edward Gibbon.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT