I went to Drudge once several years back. Even though I wanted to believe what was posted, I just couldn't. I guess it is no different than the rest of the media today.
Why the hell would he use that same stupid format? Now we have two websites that look like they're from 1997.
That is such a blatant copy of Drudge's format that I doubt it will last long. IANAL, but surely there's some kind of protection against that sort of thing.
I actually like the Drudge format. Straight up headlines without all the glitz. Clean and simple.
It doesn't matter what your sources are if you allow someone else to choose which stories you read. Sites like Drudge and this new one you're hawking are for lazy people who don't want to challenge themselves.
Fascinating grammar choices in that post.
Oh my. Did it hurt your feelings that someone described his feelings about the disgusting person some of you elected? Need to find a safe place?
You said early in this thread that you didn't like some of the stories Drudge linked to. You implied he was too gay-friendly. It's very clear from this thread that you're just looking for an echo chamber that feeds back to you what you already believe.
Says the person who abandoned the candidate whose policy and political stance she supported for a candidate that was the same sex...not because of policy.
Is there any other way to treat them? Oh yea, point and laugh...
You can call Hillary a lot of things, but crazy isn't one of them. It probably would have helped her if she was, because it looks like a lot of people were invested in crazy this time.
