i'd start with you after that crypto trickbag you put me in
Just hold your coins my friend. A loss isn’t realiZed unless you sell. My Matic isn’t near its ATH, but considering I bought so low, I’m not complaining.
I’m not as well read and intelligent as you academics. Ya’ll would eat me alive. I prefer playing dumb.
There are no more ideas, we’ve covered them all. There is no growth because we know it all. There is no conversation because we have like buttons, ignore buttons, and emojis.
Not as much as I'd like. Seems I'm not nearly as important or influential as I thought I was.
I believe in you and will support you in the election for trailer park czar.
Not Eppy's fault. The AOTF died when they had to subtract Andy and added the "A". Kinda like the Kennedy Award sealing that you're no longer news in culture.
Consciousness will increase your awareness. That might - or might not - be a good thing . . . at your age.
Heah go:
It's an eye opener for sure.Consciousness will increase your awareness. That might - or might not - be a good thing . . . at your age.
As a Dem it’s hard to argue against. Then again I’ve lost faith in pretty much the whole political system. I usually feel I’m voting for greater of less evils.
I tried to post some pics of toothpicks keeping eyes open, but it was more than I could muster.
So the question is whether it's the nature of the Democratic Party, or the nature of cities. Some would say that biblical literature was biased against cities, and rural biases against cities are in direct lineage from that. Hence rural vs. urban in politics today, which mirrors the rural/evangelical vs. urban/cosmopolitan divide that we see in society.
I always use that voting strategy. I've voted for both parties (in the same election) and for the most part I could listen to the arguments for the opposing candidate and agree with the argument if not the conclusion. trump is the first candidate that I can think of where no matter the question/problem posed there is no logical argument where he would be the answer/solution.
I am not trying to be argumentative. I am just asking a question. If you take Trump’s personality out of the equation, there are no policies he put forth that you thought had merit?
www.politico.com
During his initial campaign he:
So you are opposed to sentencing reform and other criminal justice reforms he supported and signed into law. I wouldn’t have known that before today.
I don't think you are alone with that feeling. We continue to elect and re-elect the same nonperforming, self promoting people that are not in it for the country, they are in it for themselves. This is NOT a party specific comment and I swear that! As said adnauseam, we deserve the leadership we elect.
Not all of them. The number of policy initiatives that I'd call "stupid" exceed the number of policy initiatives I'm OK with. Here's a breakdown, based on a cursory read of the list you attached:
